October 31, 2004

Saw a line from Ann Annplebaum's column about Saddam Hussein & the aftermath of the war:

Increasingly, everything that is wrong in Iraq, from the malfunctioning infrastructure to the ethnic tensions, is blamed on the U.S. occupation. A wider debate about how Iraq got to where it is -- how Hussein mismanaged the country, murdered whole villages and stole the nation's money -- might help persuade Iraqis to invest in the present.

One gets the sense that Iraqis needed - but had not wanted or asked for - help. They appear not to be ready to take responsibility for their own part in the situation, and until you take responsibility...(you know the rest).

Still, this was juxtaposed by an email from KTC, who was hesitant to make a phone call to someone who she thought might need - though not want - her help: "...But my favorite priest of all time had the most accurate view, I think. When he escorted a group of 4th grade girls and their moms to a nursing home one Christmas, he didn't hesitate to ask the nurse to wake Catholic patients up. "If YOU were cooped up in here 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, and a bunch of school kids came in wanting to sing YOU Christmas carols, would you want them to skip you? Heck, you can sleep anytime, but we don't show up anytime!"

Personally, I hope God doesn't wait for distress calls.
Our Pastor's Sermon

Msgr. Lane used the gospel reading of Zacchaeus to speak in a practical way. He said most of us can relate to Zacchaeus, being similarly small of spiritual stature. He said we should once in awhile try to see over the clutter, seek Christ, to look for what is higher amid the compulsiveness this hyper-political season breeds. "We risk becoming as small as our world is."

His homily is no-nonsense. He doesn't pretend we aren't spiritually small. Our pastor's expectations seem to be low, which makes improvement seem possible because we don't have a high hurdle to leap. (He once said words to the effect that it is the young people who will be the force of renewal in the church and I thought, "hey, hey, is he giving up on us middle-agers?" But at the same time I reluctantly recognized a truth in it.)

Beautiful reading from the book of Wisdom (Wisdom 11:22 - 12:2) today (a bennie of being Catholic since it's not in the KJV):
But you have mercy on all, because you can do all things; and you overlook the sins of men that they may repent. For you love all things that are and loathe nothing that you have made; for what you hated, you would not have fashioned. And how could a thing remain, unless you willed it; or be preserved, had it not been called forth by you?But you spare all things, because they are yours, O LORD and lover of souls, for your imperishable spirit is in all things! Therefore you rebuke offenders little by little, warn them, and remind them of the sins they are committing, that they may abandon their wickedness and believe in you, O LORD!
UPDATE: See Tom's comments on this reading.
Firesale of Weekend Ramblings

Work is tenuous at best. The office climate is mass paranoia, and I wonder how long the second word in “unchallenging job” will still be applicable to me. The bigwigs huddle, never a good sign, and there are wars and rumors of war. To me the matter is settled: do my fool job until God says otherwise. The only vague sense of unease I have is a curious absence of a vague sense of unease, which gives new reason for unease. But I have a sense of rest about it because 1) God knows my limits, and they are very limiting and 2) good soldiers wait for orders before plunging ahead and 3) all you have to do is ask!

Edge of Weekend

Oh sweet the weekend!
bred this Friday night
begun with Guinness and chimes
and jigs and rhymes
till the hour breaks Saturday’s cusp
and dew forms the bluegrass.

By Saturday’s winsomeness
there are volumes limitless
bound in life tuxes,
perfumed in white margins
and burnt-bled of writers wrists.

Oh then to read in the scent-heavy study
‘midst the glow of the lava
near where yard leaves gather
in their hue-full clumps
while a DVD plays
the unwatched episode of “Ballykissangel”.

Only in chill and damp
are books opened and stories told,
For on hot summer days your DNA dances
and the only thought between
heaven and earth is:
“Boswell needs to get a life!”
_

Had a dream where I went to Communion after asking the priest beforehand if I could have 50 Eucharists. He'd said yes, and so after everyone received I knelt at the Communion rail. I'd expected to receive them all at once in a stack which I could presumably consume quickly or take back to my seat...i.e. remain inconspicuous. Instead he gave me Eucharist after Eucharist treating each as separate and with identical reverence ("The Body of Christ".."Amen".."The Body of Christ".."Amen" ). I'm greatly agitated by the spectacle. Everyone is watching from the pews asking "who is this guy?" And I'm thinking how presumptuous and unrighteous I was to ask for 50 Eucharists and how the priest had handled it perfectly. Instead of telling me "no" he did what I'd asked, only in a way I hadn't expected. And so I couldn't be mad at him, only at myself.

October 30, 2004

Awfully Mature, This John Allen

This Word From Rome guy sounds like a real adult:
o Can we desist from patterns of speech and thought that are destructive of dialogue? For example, can we stop pretending there's an animal out there called "the bishops" that has only one way of thinking and acting? In the United States, the Catholic bishops run from Tom Gumbleton to Fabian Bruskewitz and every point of the compass in between. There's little sense in sweeping jeremiads about "the bishops."

Are we prepared, for example, to step outside our prejudices to sympathetically consider the other? I noted that I heard during the weekend negative references to the Catholic TV network EWTN, and descriptions of Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, the Vatican's top doctrinal official, as if he were Genghis Kahn. In Schreiter's session, he happened to mention that a new bishop in Austria comes from Opus Dei, and the gasps were audible, as if he had said the bishop was a member of the Nazi party or the Klu Klux Klan. Of course, this was a conversation among friends, and some of these comments were just blowing off steam. Still, what does this suggest about our capacity for dialogue? (The same question could be put to some conservative Catholics who scorn, for example, Voice of the Faithful, the staff of the U.S. bishops' conference, and any number of bishops they regard as "soft" on dissent).

o Are we sufficiently critical of the manifold ways in which secularity shapes our own imaginations, instincts and prejudices? To hear some people talk, I said, one might think "secularity" is a cultural force outside the church which we must seek out and engage. In reality, I argued, secularity was in this room -- it's the air in which we live and move and have our being. As one proof of the point, I said, I heard more references over the weekend to movies and TV shows than I did to Charles Borromeo or Luigi Sturzo.

o Isn't part of the reason that the "secular world" so often turns a deaf ear to us precisely because in so many ways we look, talk and act exactly like it? For example, haven't we reproduced inside the church, in exacting detail, the same polarization, the same ideological hatreds, and the same interest group strategies drawn from the secular world? Don't we see that pattern, to take one current instance, in Catholic debate over the Bush/Kerry election?
And much more...
Liberal
by Vincent O'Sullivan

Consider this:
A man who feels for the people.
A friend to the ill-favoured.
Never a word against the bar-
barians assuming Roman dress.

Reconcile this:
A believer in man's potential.
A voice raised against the games
where human flesh is sport.
A man whose eyes fill at music.

You might at least concede:
No man went hungry from my door.
No woman was molested.
No child was imposed on.
Humanitas inevitable as breath.

I who might have, have
never raped, pillaged, extorted;
abused office or position;
concealed; interfered with art;
stood between any man and the sunset.

And yet as you say,
I have killed a god. I have made
of impartiality, a farce.
I have dabbled in chaos. I,
Pilate. Who vote as you do.

--via Sancta Sanctis

October 29, 2004

Listenin' to Cajun music and I can still see the gator-smile of the bass player of Michael Cormier & the Can’t Hardly Playboys in my mind's eye. I hain’t seen a bigger grin this side of Paradise. When the Cardinals scored a run against the Astros the band tried to take credit for the audience cheers, thanking them profusely. Later runs were similarly received, the moral bein' you take what you can get, even if it's leftovers.

I have a renewed hunger to read. I'm in reading deficit and I go to bed hungry every night. I’m longing to lounge through Boswell’s “Life of Johnson”. And why not Borges’ little non-fiction pieces? Updike’s “Early Stories”? I ordered it. Ala carte. I opened the fresh biography of “Hamilton Joe” Nuxhall and the book was pungent in that jet-photography sort of way, just like National Geographics. When I was a kid, after looking for pictures of African native gals who’d forgotten their bras, I’d enjoy the amazing ink smell that Geographics are known for. Perhaps the binding was airplane glue; it was certainly addictive.

Reading about Nuxhall playing basketball on neighbor courts brought to mind my own misspent youth. While T.C. Boyle was reading Schopenhauer I was trying to be the first 5’10’’ Jerry West. The Los Angeles Laker star spent his West Virginian youth wearing out the nylon of the local basketball nets and I did likewise. I played till it was cold and dark and my fingers were numb. My sense of presumption was impressive; I wore out my neighbor’s net! They never minded, God bless them. I’m not sure I even asked nor appreciated it. There’s a metaphor in there somewhere.
Tis a Mystery

Irish writer Robert McLiam Wilson, who wrote the enjoyable "Eureka Street" (enjoyable when I was 32 at least) hasn't written anything in eight years. He's about my age, 40, still young by writer standards, so it just seems odd to me. A google search provides little insight into his situation.
It may come down to...

Four Votes in O-HI-O

From the Corner:
THE SEESAW [Jonah Goldberg]
Yesterday, I was highly confident Bush would win. Today I am only somewhat confident. My fear today is that Bush will lose Ohio. He can still win -- as Rich points out today -- if he loses Ohio. But let's face it, with Ohio out of W's W column, it's much harder.


Looking at the electoral map, it's still tighter than Hambone's budget. I think Bush will win FL and Iowa and maybe PA, but I'd be shocked if he wins WI, NJ or HI. Minnesota and Michigan are supposedly "barely Bush" states, but if they go for Bush then my name is Elmer Fudd.

Ohio is a complete unknown. Ham o' Bone seems to think that Bush is going to profit from a big evangelical vote but I find it hard to believe there were that many evangelicals who didn't vote for Bush in 2000 (remember that was also the "most important election of our lifetime" - reminds me of how during a baseball game one of us will say "play of the game!" a minimum of eight times). It seems to me Bush has to get many more votes than he did in '00 just to stay even, since Nader didn't make the ballot this time and new registrations in Democratic areas are "out the wazoo" - a technical term meaning lots. Meanwhile Peter Schramm on Backgrounders went from seeing Ohio as "Not a Swing State" on 10/27/04 to a full panic mode "Ahnold save us!" on 10/29/04. Which is kind of humorous if you think about it.

On a personal note, while I, like Charlotte Allen, am not experiencing the angst that some Catholic voters are concerning who to vote for, I do have angst in wondering if I've done enough for Bush in the form of volunteering to knock on doors, etc...So we all have guilt or uncertainty in one form or another. It is patently absurd to compare belief in a candidate to belief in God but they are alike in the sense that the greater the certainty given to you, the more that is expected of you. Bush's foil (Kerry) makes the certainty greater for me.
Jimmy Akin on whether Devout Non-Catholics Can Be As Devout As Devout Catholics   as well as how much wood could a woodchuck chuck if...
If one takes a subjective definition of "devout," by which it would mean "sincere" or "fervent in practice," then it would seem that non-Catholic Christians can be just as sincere and fervent in their practice of religion as Catholics. Catholics do not have an intrinsic subjective advantage in terms of sincerity or fervor. They do, however, have an extrinsic advantage--as you point out--in that they have means of grace available to them that can foster greater fervor. These include not only the sacraments but also sacramentals, Catholic art, etc.

Yet these extrinsic advantages can be overcome by other extrinsic factors. The pitiful preaching and catechesis that has existed in many Catholic churches for the last forty years is an extrinsic factor that mitigates against fervor, and the fervor of many Catholics has been depressed by this compared to the fervor of those in many Evangelical and Fundamentalist churches.

Historically the word "devout" may be taken in another, more objectivist sense--i.e., religious practice that makes an objective connection with God. This might be taken as something Paul has in mind when he says that "it is good to be zealous in a good thing always" (Gal. 4:18). If the term "devout" is taken in this sense (i.e., devotion that objectively makes a connection with God rather than simply being subjectively fervent without this connection necessarily being made) then the Catholic has more of an advantage.
Eve Tushnet on the election:
Bush would have to do something fairly spectacular to get me to vote for Kerry. I'm not going to pretend that I was ever a "swing voter" in that sense. And, as I said, I can't vote in this election anyway. But I know a lot of Catholics, and a lot of conservatives, are considering voting third-party or sitting this one out. And I hope they won't. I don't think Bush's foreign-policy failures are worth a Kerry presidency. I know this is unlikely to persuade; so I will just go back to what I have been doing, which is praying, writing fiction, volunteering, and trying to bring some kind of order and hope to my life and the lives of the people I can touch.
 Extreme
   Soul
      Makeover
 - check your local listings!

      Transcript from last week's show:
Dah-ling, you've let yourself go! Those are the seven deadly sins, not virtues, for heaven sakes. Thank God he starts where we are and not where we should be.



Fortunately we have a team of specialists here to assist: soulatologists, prayer stylists, alms artists, soul beauticians, confessors, spiritual personal trainers, and most importantly the Soul Surgeon, who never leaves a scar. He's always available and no appointments are needed, so don't hesitate to talk with him.

First we'll introduce you to Mary, who without question has the most beautiful soul ever created. I promise she won't blanch at your split ends. We had a gal come in the other day with really crappy nails and Mary didn't blink an eye. Remarkable because Mary's nails look like Heaven! She'll have you say the Rosary which will soften the skin of your soul. You'll feel like buttah!

During your stay there will be a Confessional purgative, where you will experience the healing balm of forgiveness and unmerited mercy. Depending on your needs, we'll set up sessions with our staff of saints who have undergone similar extreme makeovers. Augustine and Magdalen are favorites for those with problems with wrinkles, eye bags, acne and scars. But first a herbal bath in the Psalms. And don't worry. As an old curmudgeon once told me, "Pray, hope and don't worry!"
Twas the Night of the Election

Twas the night of the election and all through the land
Not a creature was stirring, not even Rove's hand
All the chads were hung by the voters with care
In the hope that a result would soon be there.

Then, what to my wondering eyes should appear,
but lawyers and gadflys in a shiny new Lear.
A maniacal flyer with a voice like a roar,
I knew in a moment it must be Michael Moore.

And more rapid than eagles his minions all came
As he shouted “On Carville” and each operative's name.
And so up to Ohio the minions soon flew
With a sleigh full of lawsuits and false charges, too.
Down the chimney he came with a leap and a bound;
He wore a strange ballcap, and his belly was round.

He spoke a few words then went straight to his work,
He filled the stockings with lies and turned with a jerk.
Then giving the finger and pinching his nose,
He gave us a nod up the chimney he rose.
And I heard him exclaim as he flew out of sight,
“Merry elections to all and to all a long night!”

October 28, 2004

Via Email...

It looks like Kerry needs Ohio far more than Bush does, which is some measure of comfort here in the Buckeye state:
The 2004 General election in Ohio has the very real potential of being the most chaotic in the state’s history, a condition likely to be echoed in the other five ‘battleground states.’ It appears that Ohio could very well be the most contested election among the 50 states this year, with current Presidential polls a virtual draw, all within the margin of error. Within just the past week Ohio has been moved from a “leaning Bush” to a “toss-up” state.

Four years ago the Gore campaign withdrew much of its campaign resources about three weeks before the election, essentially conceding the state to Bush. In retrospect, political observers view this decision as probably costing Gore the election, since Bush won by only slightly more than 3%.

Of the 5 states listed in the “too close to call,” Ohio controls more than one-half (20) of the 37 total electoral votes in the balance in toss-up states. The environment is clearly ripe for a flood of “political” operatives entering Ohio from all over the country, who will do all they can to get out the vote on Election Day for their preferred candidate. Consequently the Presidential election results in Ohio are virtually impossible to predict. Second week of October national polling results show that Kerry must win Ohio to become President.
The title alone made me smile. Also, she rebuts an anti-blogger here.
"Why Not Us?"

Touching "Win it for..." thread (via Mark S.) posted before the Red Sox win. Hard not to get choked up. Fifty-four pages (at last count), a summa of prayers, a proverbial ocean of heartsick and longing for which the Germans have the perfect word: sehnsucht. From the first couple pages:
Win it for dad who will stop hating them if they win

Win it for mom who passed away 10-23-03.

She never really cared much about the Sox, outside of the fact that she knew I was always in a better mood when they won, until last post season. She watched all the games against Oakland, even game one that ended at 2:30 am.

She called me for play by play during game 6 vs NY because her home town lost power in the late innings.

One of the last things she said to me on 10-22-03, when I was visiting her at the hospital a few days after game 7 was it's too bad they couldn't have won.
*
Win it for the guy Roger Angell wrote about when summing up the 1975 World Series--the guy he imagined driving his car somewhere on a lonely road in New England while listening to Game 6, who, when Pudge hits the HR, stops his car, gets out, and jumps up and down for sheer joy: Everyman.

"We're the leaders of tomorrow."
"Yeah, but it's today."
- Firesign Theatre

[Reminds me of the gospel story where the sister of Lazurus looks to a future resurrection of the dead and Jesus says, "I am the Resurrection": "it is today!"]
*
Win it for Grandma and Grandpa Starrett. They taught my mother and I how to truly love baseball.

Win it for Grandma Anderson who told me just before she passed that she was pretty sure they would win one sometime soon.

Win it for Grandpa Anderson with the Hope that this may briefly pierce the shroud of Alheimzer's that surrounds this noble man.

Win it for Mom and Me we have agreed to only speak briefly after each game mostly to see if we are both still alive.

Win it for my daughter who is watching the games at UCSD. She reminds me of a loney freshmen at RPI in 1978. May she met some life long friends like I did so long ago.

Win it for us all
Updated

I posted more prose on my prose for Nigerian Scammers blog. Rated PG-13.
Ephesians 5 Rules

Is there anything more beautiful than Ephesians 5? I'm not talking about wives being submissive to their husbands but just beyond that, to the real wine:
...Christ loved the church and handed himself over for her to sanctify her, cleansing her by the bath of water with the word, that he might present to himself the church in splendor, without spot or wrinkle or any such thing, that she might be holy and without blemish. So (also) husbands should love their wives as their own bodies. He who loves his wife loves himself. For no one hates his own flesh but rather nourishes and cherishes it, even as Christ does the church, because we are members of his body.

"For this reason a man shall leave (his) father and (his) mother and be joined to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh."

This is a great mystery, but I speak in reference to Christ and the church.
The spectacular awe of this passage is Christ leaving his Father to be joined to his church and become one flesh with us, "cleansing us in the bath of water with the word" so that he might present us without blemish to the Father. That's an exquisite, inexpressibly wonderful image and a balm to the tough love expressed in yesterday's Gospel reading, Luke 13:22-30. Eligibility for salvation in the OT was blood - kin-blood of being of the tribe of Jacob. In the NT, it wasn't changed from the material to strictly spiritual but fulfilled utterly, by reception of the Blood of Christ, making us of the tribe of Jacob.

October 27, 2004

From a Review of "Early Stories"

...here:
Unlike writers like Emerson and Thoreau, who needed spectacular natural surroundings to bolster their artistic and theological visions, [John] Updike needs only ordinary things to do so. He sees truth, and indeed, evidence of God Himself, in the commonplace things around him. The narrator in one of his stories says, “A piece of turf torn from a meadow becomes a Gloria when drawn by Durer. Details. Details are the giant’s fingers.” The ordinary, to Updike, is extraordinary. The mundane is magical.
Caveman

An Ohio legislator retired last year and I'm not sure but I think he was nicknamed "Dr. No" (or was it "the Caveman"?) because he voted down every new spending idea not on the merits but on the principle that guvmint was big enough, thank you very much.

I thought it crude - he could at least read the proposal or bill. But we all must fill a role that is unique but not sufficient in itself, and so Mr. Caveman fulfilled the role of guardian of the public treasury knowing he was not sufficient and that proponents would do their thing. Meanwhile he remained admirably detached from what others thought of him. Despite his nays, from 1960 to 2000 Ohio went from one of the least taxed states to the top quartile, and an analysis by the Tax Foundation of each state’s “business tax friendliness” ranked Ohio 47th in the nation.

What is interesting is that the prescient Dr. No didn't get sucked in. He considered new taxes to be like kids who cajole their daddy to consider something "just this once" while knowing that just this once means just as often as their special pleading will work. Just this once is great in theory, but opens the door. With the abortion debate, was it all over when the Pill was legalized? Probably not, but once that hurdle was cleared it was much easier. Now we attempt to incrementally reverse the Culture of Death, beginning with the Conor bill and the partial-birth abortion ban. Slippery slopes work both ways.

October 26, 2004

John Updike ...

...nails it concerning the Iraq War:
"My view is that the sanctions weren't going anywhere except starving a lot of Iraqi babies, and that Saddam could play games with the U.N. forever, so something in me sympathized with George Bush's desire to remove him. He's paying for it, we're all paying for it--the soldiers who are getting killed are paying for it. It's very easy to say that this was a dreadful mistake, but I'm not sure that it was."
...And on Bible translations.
Why should not Alter’s version, its program so richly contemplated and persuasively outlined, become the definitive one, replacing not only the King James but the plethora of its revised, uninspired, and “accessible” versions on the shelf?

Several reasons why not, in the course of my reading through this massive tome (sold sturdily boxed, as if to support its weight), emerged. The sheer amount of accompanying commentary and philological footnotes is one of them. The fifty-four churchmen and scholars empowered at a conference at Hampton Court in January of 1604 to provide an authoritative English Bible had a clear charge: to supply English readers with a self-explanatory text. When they encountered a crux, they took their best guess and worked on; many of the guesses can be improved upon now, but no suggestion of an unclear and imperfect original was allowed to trouble the Word of God.

October 25, 2004

New Orleans

I was impressed by a couple things about New Orleaners, though I know one can hardly make judgments on such a micro trip. One was how friendly they were. And the other was the great facility they have in separating money from wallet while not technically pick-pocketing you. One woman gave us fine New Orleans ballcaps, seemingly gratis. Then she asked for a donation. I gave her one and she frowned and said the cap was $10. I handed back the cap. Later a panhandler with an image of a baby pinned to her shirt began polishing my tennis shoes. Now there’s a first. How can you not give a few bucks to someone who’s polishing your Sauconys while her ill baby looks up at you?

Some vacations have more of a cumulative effect about them, a piling up of brush strokes that form a larger impression rather than a heightened single memory. This first trip to the Big Easy was like that. Time was taut since we were taking one of our ‘speed travel’ trips, trying to see as much in 72 hours as possible.

First thing we did was walk down the infamous Bourbon St. in the French Quarter. It was tacky and trashy and I could already read my wife’s thoughts: “I came all the way from Ohio for this? Walking in ninety degree heat to see smut show signs?” The day was steamy hot, hotter here in late October than any Ohio August day this past summer. One fellow later told us it reached 99 degrees but he might have been just a “sayer” (my wife’s term for truth-embellisher). We came to a shop called “Jazz Funeral”, whose mission in life appeared to be to mock the traditional “remember you are dust and unto dust you shall return”. Everywhere there were skulls and skeletons, some placed in obscene positions. I recall a church in Rome where the monks had arranged their bones in artistic representations of Christian symbols like the crucifix and the sacred heart and “Jazz Funeral” seemed the flip side of that in arranging reminders of our mortality as “party, for tomorrow you may die” instead of a “pray, for tomorrow you may die”.

After a meal at Tu Jacque, a handsome old New Orleans bar full of atmosphere where the barkeep looked the part – like a method actor preparing for a role. Our group of four looked like cardboard cutouts of tourists; if there was a “Preppy Handbook” for tourists, we’d have a page.

After a few hours walking in the heat a tour bus looked very attractive. It saved our feet and we got an overview of the whole city, including a visit to Cemetery Number 3, the safest of the cemeteries, which I’d marked as a disadvantage. (A tour of a creepy cemetery combined with a lack of personal safety has a certain panache.) Our droll guide was in his late 20s and looked like he’d been doing this for awhile based on the occasional stifled yawn. He had the eccentric tic of humming a few notes when he was done pointing out something historic, as if to fill the vacuum.

He also gave the tour a Catholic-centric cast. “New Orleans was 110% Catholic and is now 80% Catholic,” he said as he pointed out some seemingly trivial sights such as local Catholic high schools and smaller Catholic churches, while ignoring non-Catholic institutions along the way. He pointed out Notre Dame seminary and said, “we’ve held our breath but so far it hasn’t been in the news” and in the silence he said, “do you get it?” and yes we nodded. No scandal news. Our stop at Cemetery number 3 was pleasingly Catholic. A large statue of Mother Teresa over a gravestone led Mark to jokingly say, “I didn’t know she was buried here!”. But this was merely a memorial, with a quote engraved in the stone: “If you pray, you will have faith. And if you have faith, you will love. And if you have love, you will serve. And if you serve, you will have peace.” All the sky tilted with the white-stoned angels and virgins in this above-ground cemetery, looking like beautiful immobile birds resting on pedestals. The tall monuments lent it the atmosphere of a town, a peaceful “City of the Dead”.

Drove by the author Anne Rice’s “Mardi Gras home” on the parade route. Beads dance in the trees long after Mardi Gras since the branches catch strands thrown from the 20-foot tall parade floats and there they remain, silently like a reveler’s Spanish moss, the only lasting trace of parties past. Our guide said that having access to a toilet is the key ingredient in a Mardi Gras home but Rice’s digs were far more than that. This beautiful white-pillared mansion was representative of the fine homes in the Garden District of the city. A surprising number of the homes were marred by large political signs. Imagine Tara in Gone With the Wind with a 5’by7’ Bush/Cheney or Kerry/Edwards sign affixed below a second floor window. Louisiana isn’t even a swing state, since the polls are decidedly in Bush’s favor, but maybe in New Orleans there are so many swing state travelers (like us) that they feel the need to assert their opinions.

The architecture is spectacular but I feel blasé. Wonder is more elusive as we age but it is only critical in the realm of religion, although I suspect there is a carryover from life in general. Can awe at the beauty of the pageantry of a Mardi Gras parade set the plate for a more religious awe? Father Joe Warrilow, the saint in Hendra’s “Father Joe” had an awe for the natural world that was almost inseparable from his awe of God. When we are young we may have a great respect for human authority, be it priest or president. This has eroded on a macro scale within the culture (JFK was a saint until the biographies came out in the late ‘60s) and I wonder if this erosion of respect for human authority has carried over to the Divine. We are not disembodied spirits, so an incarnational religion like Christianity can’t afford to lack models in the flesh.

We ate at Mike Anderson’s that night, a seafood restaurant, and I had the obligatory alligator appetizer. I’d forgotten how it tasted. Not that great. Rather chewy. (I’ll avoid the ‘tastes like chicken’ gibe, which is now older than Methuselah, which, come to think of it, is a pretty old cliche itself.) The “Big Easy” is in many ways our opposite: loose, spontaneous, heedlessly lustful. One gets the sense they don’t live in their head so much. At the restaurant I spotted a table that looked like four locals. Late 50s-something guy with a Southern ballcap with some strand (not hair) trailing from the back. 20-ish year old girl wearing lingerie and who looked like a hooker in the old timey brothel sense, rather than the Brittany Spears sense. Another woman in her 40s and a man in his 30s. Good mix of ages and there was warmth and listening and eye contact and toasts. A special occasion? Perhaps. Perhaps not? Travel is most interesting when we listen to what another culture is telling us.

Went to a hoppin’ Cajun music playing joint on Bourbon Street that night, which was okay except that audience participation was the rule, not the exception, and we were stiffer than a grove of knotty pines. The lead singer of the cleverly-named “Mitchell Cormier and the Can’t Hardly Playboys” eventually got around to personally inviting me to wear an aluminum washboard played with spoons but I declined and he said he would refuse to beg. Observers tend to like to observe rather than be observed. Or so I rationalized. Mark and Sandy were smart enough not to make eye contact and so weren’t asked.

Day 2

We boarded a streetcar not named “Desire” and headed down St. Charles Ave to the Garden District for a self-guided walking tour, a very enjoyable experience in the fine sun amid the majestic homes. The Garden District Book Shop, or Anne Rice bookstore as I came to refer to it, contained a heady bouquet of prose. I was sorely tempted to buy early and often. Rice’s “Pandora” looked interesting, as did David Lodge’s new “Author, Author” based on the life of Henry James. James lived a very full life, full of travel and friends and gustatory pleasures. Been everywhere, met everyone but never had sex. Died a virgin. Can we imagine a popular author now who hasn’t had sex? Oh yeah, I forgot - Andrew Greeley.(?)

We took a walking tour of St. Louis Cemetery No. 1 (safe if in groups) and along the way our guide took us to an 1880s brothel with pictures of some of the prostitutes on the wall. “They were well-fed” was my wife’s funny comment, as we looked at the very stout-legged women.

Voodoo is big down in New Orleans, and I, at least, got the impression our guide was a practitioner and a subtle proselytizer. At the tomb of the voodoo priestess Marie Laveau, she left three rum cigars and put her hand against the tomb while “making a wish three times”. Maybe forty-five seconds passed while she closed her eyes. “It was a big wish,” she said afterwards. She invited us to do likewise but I don’t know that any did.

The Catholic Church has refused cremation until a few decades ago and her explanation of this was not out of respect for the doctrine that we will receive resurrected bodies but because “they thought if the body was torched your souls goes to Hell”. This seemed to me to be a sort of Da Vinci Code spin to make the Church look silly but I could be wrong. A quick Google search: “The practice of burying the body dates to early years of Christianity. The Catholic Church forbid cremation because our bodies were seen as temple for the Holy Spirit and the belief in the resurrection of the body. Catholics believe that at the end of time, everyone that goes to Heaven will get their bodies back in perfect condition. Therefore, cremation was seen as a pagan activity and denied the doctrine of the Resurrection.”

But one can easily understand how appealing this Marie Laveau must be to modern women like our guide, who was a short gal with a pug nose, fair hair, blue eyes and was built like a fire plug who looked like she could probably benchpress my weight. Vodoo Marie commanded respect. Six foot tall when men averaged 4’10’’, she was of a mixed, multicultural background in a time when the usual prejudices prevailed. She was a devout Catholic who became interested in this “earthy” religion of voodoo (our guide gave parallels to Native American and new age religions). A romantic story was Ms. Laveau’s. A white naval captain renounced part of his freedom when he married her, since at that time intermarriage had legal implications.

We had lunch at a micro-brewery, in the shadow of the large gold vats where the bier was made, just behind the bar where “To Go” cups are offered. The Black Forest brew was sumptuous and rich, the best of the five we received as samples. One could get lost in that Schwarzvald. I had one to go, and we walked some more, briefly losing Mark who was on the nearly fruitless mission of finding a non-raunchy New Orleans T-shirt for his brother.

I walked into an antique shop that specialized in old religious art objects and I was struck by how they seemed to have some indefinably different quality over those of more recent vintage. They seem more somber, more realistic somehow. I couldn’t put my finger on it. I’d recently been to a religious gift shop at the Retreat center, and everything was light, airy, and Hallmark-y. I was never arrested in my tracks at that store as I was in this shop.
_

We eventually made our way back to Bourbon Street to see if we could find one of those policeman on horseback like you see on Cops at Mardi Gras. (We don’t get out much; had to get a picture of a cop on those tall horses.) We walked up and down the long street, our legs aching and dodging the drunks and weathering the wretched masses of vomit before deciding it was a lost cause. We turned left on Toulouise to go to our final evening destination: an Irish pub. My wife loves horses and was sorely disappointed, but the show must go on. I took one last look at the street jammed with people and in the distance saw the faint blue helmet of one of New Orleans’ finest, and we hustled after him like Vladimirs who had found Godot. Pictures were taken, peace restored, and we headed to the Irish pub off the beaten path.

The singer was named O’Flaherty and he came from the Aran Islands forty years ago and he reminded me again of how lucky I am to be an American, how I’m just one-hundred and sixty years removed from desperate poverty, the poverty of the Irish before and during the Great Hunger. He seemed a throw-back, a moist-eyed sensitive soul who thanked his doorman as if he were his best friend. Perhaps he is. He said his wife made up a website and you can tell he wasn’t the computer type. The internet is a somewhat cold and impersonal medium. He was a popular folksinger from the ‘60s and 70s and played at large venues then when folk was held in high esteem. He said he wasn’t a “pub guy”, wouldn’t play them anymore, because he was “too controversial” despite saying nothing that was controversial as far as I could tell. This pub was his pub and so it didn’t count; he could enforce the rules which appeared to be no smoking and no loud talking. I think he might’ve gotten used to the attentiveness of the crowd in the 70s and now has had to experience the painful withdrawal symptoms when something is taken away. He reminded me of John Denver in that sense.

Day 3

Took the drive out to Cajun country, towards Lafayette, ground zero of the French Acadians. I always notice and appreciate church signs and I wasn’t disappointed on this trip: “Praise God for 1100 in attendance at Drama” and “Over 10 Trillion Served” (the latter referring to Communion services at an Episcopalian church).

We were headed for Zam’s Swamp Tour, a brochure for which was providentially found in a taxi cab on the way to the car rental. We arrived just after noon and I was elected to ask what time the 1:30 tour began. (The brochure had said so, but idiot tourist questions are my stock-in-trade, and I did not disappoint. The coup d’ grace is when your fellow tourists say that you asked idiot tourist questions.)

Instead of waiting till 1:30 we visited the more yuppified swamp tour across the street (is ‘yuppified swamp tour’ an oxymoron?). They advertised a web site, which no self-respecting Cajun swamp tour would. There was nothing Deliverance-y about this set up, no siree. It was a clean, well-lit place with a modern home, red truck in the driveway, cut grass, graveled driveway with nary a gravel out of place and run by a mother and a son.

By contrast, Zam’s was populated with old live oaks and three good ol’ boys who looked like French Acadian fur trappers swapping stories with thick-lipped accents. They had little animals in small cages; a black dog lay silent in his 2’ by 2’ cell. Rabbits hung suspended in cages from the tree branches. It lent an atmosphere of menace, or at least authenticity, to the extent bunnies in cages can add authenticity to anything.

The weather was sweetly hot. Summer was out on furlough and we’d timed our own furlough perfectly. On a beautiful sun-drenched day we lived in the body here in slow-moving water amid the gators and herons and egrets and eagles. It was soporific, the hum of the engine and sun on the face. We received a private tour and our guide provided lots of information about regulations on alligator hunting and the business side of living in South Louisiana.

We ate at a Cajun-style restaurant at which “rack of elk” was offered. Wouldn’t an elk’s horns be a bit hard to chew? Rimshot. One nice thing about writing is you can airbrush personal embarrassments by ascribing them to other people. For example, Mark never could figure out why many like shrimp cocktail. It was unpleasant, biting a hard tasteless shell. Steph mentions how you’re supposed to remove the legs and shell first! Ahhh…it tasted better to Mark, but still not quite worth the effort, even assuaged by a couple Shiner Bocks.

Afterwards we made our way to a Zydeco joint. Benches lined the dance floor and it reminded me of an old roller rink. The music blasted, Randol’s Salle de Danse was the legend over the dance floor. The motion of the squeeze box was hypnotizing; this one was a beautiful tinsel green the color of Christmas wrapping. How nice to be outside the stifling world of politics! Vacations like this that involve exploring another geography gives me a thirst for a good history book. History is non-utilitarian since I’m not a policy-maker and thus not doomed to repeat macro historical events. The danger in writing about trips is that it can becomes experience for writing’s sake instead of experience for experience’s sake. It’s hard to shut off the prose-making part of the brain, which is buried in the reptilian part which also controls breathing and reflexes. (rimshot.) The problem with talking vs listening and writing vs reading is that in the first instance you put others to sleep while in the last you fall asleep. At least I do, when reading good prose like Percy’s. My theory is that if you’re not well-rested, you’re not listening.

So what’s it like in a city where they memorize a strange area code and in a geographically distant place so foreign they call their counties "parishes"? A Lafayette dance hall might have had certain associations in my mind previous but now I was in one and now know what I’d previously only conjured. My lasting impression of the hall is how the sheer amount of good will and happiness there could've powered a small city. This seems a place where the children dance joyfully, the men love their wives and the bands are all above average, to borrow from Keillor.

Sunday morning we went to the Cathedral of St. John the Evangelist. A fine sermon about God’s love, and about the tension between reverence towards God versus too much familiarity. The Church, he said, in her wisdom has us stand to receive Christ in Communion because God insists we receive him in mutuality. We are utterly unworthy to receive the Eucharist, but God’s love is of a piece that he wants us to meet him as friends.

October 20, 2004

Welcome To Ohio, to be known on 11/3 as "Litigation Central"

You're nobody till Jesse notices you.
Is this their year?

In a way it would be sad if they won it all. The Red Sox would become like any other team. Boston combines excellence and tragedy in a way Chicago never has - the Cubs are damned, the Red Sox are being purged into Pulchritude. Sox fans are the adults of the baseball world: they know tragedy but never lose heart. They are the Christians, the long-sufferers who know that at any given moment their patience will be rewarded. They live the Beatitudes, year after year, having faith that past results do not guarantee future performance.

Far from the harbor where the whaling ships sail you can smell the brine scent of mystery churning in the Atlantic, in the waves that rise and fall breathing out Fenway's fortunes. A series win would erode some of the mythology of the Nantucket team; their great whale slain, the fans would lose their hunger, their ardor, their maniacal devotion, their sweet humility and piety. In the City of Man winning corrupts and absolute winning corrupts absolutely.

Easy for the non-suffering to say. And could there be a better time, now, matched against the haughty, gouty, payroll-engorged Yankees? Meanwhile, the angst continues:
But now, Dear lord, I collapse, my ulcers raging.
I am your servant, Lord, but I am just about used up.
I ask your grace that I might be strong, O Lord, and able to survive tonight, Whatever thy will brings to the Idiots.
I ask that you steel my will, and allow me to withstand the ramblings Of McCarver.
Dear Lord, of all your trials, he may be the most cruel!

St. Spaceman, Proto-Idiot, ora pro nobis
- ? -

Palestinians say that the U.S. election is stalling the "peace process", but given that suicide bombings and retaliations are way down, am I off base to think that maybe the delay of the peace process a good thing?

October 19, 2004

Please Consider Donating ...

...to the Manny Ramirez batting helmet fund. The destitute hitter apparently can't afford a new one.
Different Tate

Inspired by a Steven Riddle post I was looking for Alan Tate's poems but came across this James Tate poem excerpted here:
Some people go their whole lives
without ever writing a single poem.
Extraordinary people who don't hesitate
to cut somebody's heart or skull open.
They go to baseball games with the greatest of ease.
and play a few rounds of golf as if it were nothing.
These same people stroll into a church
as if that were a natural part of life.
Investing money is second nature to them.
They contribute to political campaigns
that have absolutely no poetry in them
and promise none for the future.
They sit around the dinner table at night
and pretend as though nothing is missing.
Their children get caught shoplifting at the mall
and no one admits that it is poetry they are missing.
The family dog howls all night,
lonely and starving for more poetry in his life....

*

Radiant childhood sweetheart,
secret code of everlasting joy and sorrow,
fanciful pen strokes beneath the eyelids:
all day, all night meditation, knot of hope,
kernel of desire, pure ordinariness of life
seeking, through poetry, a benediction
or a bed to lie down on, to connect, reveal,
explore, to imbue meaning on the day's extravagant labor.
And yet it's cruel to expect too much.
It's a rare species of bird
that refuses to be categorized.
Its song is barely audible.
It is like a dragonfly in a dream--
here, then there, then here again,
low-flying amber-wing darting upward
then out of sight.
And the dream has a pain in its heart
the wonders of which are manifold,
or so the story is told.
Good Morning, Columbus

We have an occasional problem with clutter, which can take the form of food items. A box of donuts not immediately refrigerated is an example. Or a loaf of bread that fails to make the long journey from the kitchen counter to kitchen cabinent. Fortunately we have a pet who disposes of all biodegradable materials (and some not so biodegradable - he once ate razor blades, our stock story illustrating his omnivorousness).

We refer to him as the clutter tax collector and we had a major assessment today. He devoured a turkey breast of bones, meat and wings and cartilage. Where once there was a half-eaten bird there is now just the stark, empty, glistening surface of a plastic dome lid, the fruit of his impressive anti-entrophic efforts. I'd had a late night snack and left it in a "safe location", i.e. on top of my tall roll-top desk. But where there's a will there's a doggie. He'd scale mountains for less than fowl. So we have a 4:30 appointment with the vet because apparently splinters from bones can fatally pierce canine intestines. Sigh. I remember a simpler age when "give a dog a bone" wasn't a death wish.

So I ponder Obi's troubles and start the car and note the odd flashing light on the dashboard. I think it's safe to say unusual blinking on the dash is never good. The symbol appeared to be of an air bag and I immediately deduced it as an air bag light. The owner's manual said: "get it serviced immediately", (best said with a slight German accent). I found this odd, since how serious can the air bag be? I mean we're not talking the engine. But the curtness of the manual was bothersome. You'd think they'd simply say "this means your air bag deployment system is effed up". But it didn't. I began to wonder, in my pre-morning coffeeless state, if this light meant merely that my air bag would fail to deploy or if in ten miles the fuel tank would explode due to a regrettable computer glitch. I was given much time to reflect on this due to a tremendous, awe-inspiring traffic jam on interstate 70. But - whether temporary I cannot say - after Mass the light blinkered no more!
Provocative comments on why Jews vote against their own interests.
Cleansing the Palate

Ugh. Way too much soap boxing in that last post. My tendency toward preachiness is insatiable. Let's change the subject with this humorous Derbyshirian comment regarding Bill O'Reilly:
In war, you take what allies you can get. You're not going to get Edmund Burke hosting on prime-time TV. Heck, you're not going to get William F. Buckley, Jr. This is *TV*. It's junk. If there's a junk-conservative, a sometime-kinda-conservative, a not-quite-our-kind-of-conservative running a popular prime-time TV show, go down on your knees and give thanks. It's more than we can expect. It's more than we had for 50 years.
Et Tu ODC?

Sad. Ellen Goodman given a platform at a Catholic college. I saw a car yesterday with the window sticker "Ohio Dominican" and two bumper stickers: "9/11 Was a Faith-based Initiative" and "Kerry for a Stronger America". Oy vey.

Harvard and Yale began life as unashamedly sectarian institutions. The ceremonial shedding of "parochial" beliefs over time almost seems like part of the lifecycle of private schools founded on Christian principles. Intellectual pride is perhaps most difficult sin to avoid so it's no surprise that universities would chafe under the restrictions of church or biblical injunction. Some theologians have contempt for bishops because of their comparative lack of knowledge. But faith is the key and Jesus was clear in resisting rule by theologians when he selected a fishermen as the chief authoritarian.

Inviting Ellen Goodman is poring salt in the wounds of the children who have died in abortions. It saddens me because though funding alternative schools like Ave Maria and Christendom may be necessary, this risks furthering the split in the Catholic Church. We all should fervently resist - because God does - remnanthood.

Perhaps school presidents, like pastors, have to achieve a balancing act. Pope John Paul II expressed misgivings in his latest book, "Rise, Let Us Be On Our Way":
Another responsibility that certainly forms part of a pastor's role is admonition. I think that in this regard I did too little. There is always a problem in achieving a balance between authority and service. Maybe I should have been more assertive. I think this is partly a matter of my temperament. Yet it could also be related to the will of Christ, who asked his Apostles not to dominate but to serve.

Obviously a bishop has authority, but much depends on the way he exercises it. If a bishop stresses his authority too much, then the people think all he can do is issue commands. On the other hand, if he adopts an attitude of service, the faithful spontaneously listen to him and willingly submit to his authority. So a certain balance is needed. If a bishop says: "I'm in charge here" or "I'm only here to serve," then something is missing: He must serve by ruling and rule by serving. We have an eloquent model of this dual approach in Christ Himself: He served unceasingly, but in the spirit of serving God He was also able to expel the money changers from the temple when this was needed.
    Spanning the Globe to Bring You the Constant Variety of Posts

Being attacked by a shark (a crazy fear that never hits me in the ocean, only in swimming pools, even though I know the impossibility - something that goes back to my competitive swimming days), Kenny G, Canada - the three biggest fears of Erik of "Erik's Rants & Recipes"

Speaking of scruples, if it's established that we have to vote, do we also have to be dismayed that many potential Kerry voters won't be motivated enough to get to the polls? - Mama Owl aka Davey's mommy

Overall, I had a good time. I think they had a good time too but I won't know for sure until I read the evaluations. Ugh... nothing like getting ripped a new one for your volunteer work.- Elena of My Domestic Church

But I would not trust someone to tell me about sin through art, just because they happen to be a prodigious sinner. I think you need sin + grief to make something true and redemptive. You need to have a profound sense of falling short of your nature at the least, and ideally the certainty of having turned away from God ("Against You, You alone have I sinned. What is evil in Your sight, I have done." My sense is, Graham Greene lived in a continual state of grief. As did Dostoevsky. As did Emily Dickinson. As did Lord Byron. - Barbara of Church of the Masses

I think coming from a free-will-emphatic upbringing is good for maintaining faith (or at least belief) in the face of evil and suffering, but not so good for trusting that you yourself won't bring about (more) evil and suffering. - Mama Owl/Davey's mommy

One good thing about being a beginner is that you always know how to make progress. Whenever I get off track, I'm sure to find that I've wandered out of the cell of self-knowledge, leaving humility behind...It may be possible to fail as a disciple of Christ without failing at self-knowledge and humility, but I never have. - Tom of Disputations

A French emigrant Catholic writes at Godspy of war and abortion as two faces of evil. I applaud her conciliatory tone, but find I don't quite agree with the dichotomy she describes. My sense: Firemen and policemen responding to an emergency are acting selflessly, as are soldiers who defend their country, or fight for the freedom of others. Raising a child is an exercise in selflessness. Carrying and bearing a child is, too. Snuffing out the life of unborn child who is inconvenient is not. In other words, warfare can be pursued for a good cause. Can the same be said for abortion? Where the political parties in this country reflect the same side of the coin, in my view, is in the exaltation of personal gratification and gain over and against personal responsibility or the notion of sacrifice for the greater good. A fixation on "freedom of choice," on one hand, and on tax-cuts and the pocketbook, on the other, smacks of selfishness; so, too, for that matter, does sloth in the face of the world's dangers and challenges. - Mark of Irish Elk

Vile Bodies Evelyn Waugh--I'm sure it's no new discovery to note that one should be extremely cautious in the quantity of Waugh one consumes at any one time. Cynicism and bitterness tend to be contagious. - Steven Riddle of Flos Carmeli

In any case, the Culbreaths are moving to Orland. I want my kids to know the difference between goose eggs and chicken eggs. I want them to know how to prune trees and plant corn and shovel manure. We can do this in Orland, without cutting ties to our spiritual home and dearest friends in the big city. And I'll do my best to persuade anybody who will listen that Orland would be a fine destination for Catholic resettlement on a grand scale. - Jeff of ECR

One of the reasons I enjoyed the weekend: I thought little about politics. - Lileks

But blogging about politics is fun. It's also like salt: it seasons the ephemera, gardening, and web-surfing if not overused, but ruins the taste if huge amounts are used. - commenter on Bill of Summa Minutiae's blog

Why you need a horse if you've got wings I don't know, but it's a cool image. - Camassia, upon visiting an Orthodox church and seeing a large painting of the Archangel Michael on horseback

"Was it oveh when the Germans bombed Pearl Habah?" it rightly has been observed at Sons of Sam Horn. A poster at the Royal Rooters gives the prescription: Petey needs to play Oedipus tonight. - Mark of Irish Elk on the Red Sox being down in the ALCS

October 18, 2004

Conversion Story

Heard the remarkable conversion story of Roy Schoeman on EWTN's Bookmark, author of Salvation is from the Jews . After a Jewish upbringing he fell away from all faith, graduated from M.I.T. and eventually taught at Harvard. One day he felt this incredible sea of love for him. He referred to it as "falling into Heaven". He asked that God not tell him His name - Buddha it or a pagan Roman god or whatever - because he wanted to be anything other than a Christian and feared it would be Christ. That request was honored until he was ready to ask.

Later he had an experience of the Blessed Virgin Mary and he knew in a moment how exalted she was and he longed to say a prayer but knew none. He asked what was her favorite prayer that was said to her and she said she liked all of them. He pressed her: surely you like one better than others? And she said a prayer in Portugese. He memorized the phonetics of the first sentence or two and later researched it. It was "Immaculate Mary, conceived without sin, pray for us who have recourse to thee". Portugal is the site of Fatima and there the first prayer mothers teach their children is that one, hence one could understand the special appeal.

October 17, 2004

Frugal Prayers

Ham of Bone is an American original. Who else would proffer a post about Borges's musings over a Coleridgian vision joined to his own $2.99 (per roll) answer to prayer? From Kublai Khan to the Meijer's photo lab without missing a beat!
My Library
Robert Service

Like prim Professor of a College
I primed my shelves with books of knowledge;
And now I stand before them dumb,
Just like a child that sucks its thumb,
And stares forlorn and turns away,
With dolls or painted bricks to play.

They glour at me, my tomes of learning.
"You dolt!" they jibe; "you undiscerning
Moronic oaf, you make a fuss,
With highbrow swank selecting us;
Saying: "I'll read you all some day'—
And now you yawn and turn away.

"Unwanted wait we with our store
Of facts and philosophic lore;
The scholarship of all the ages
Snug packed within our uncut pages;
The mystery of all mankind
In part revealed—but you are blind.

"You have no time to read, you tell us;
Oh, do not think that we are jealous
Of all the trash that wins your favour,
The flimsy fiction that you savour:
We only beg that sometimes you
Will spare us just an hour or two.

"For all the minds that went to make us
Are dust if folk like you forsake us,
And they can only live again
By virtue of your kindling brain;
In magice print they packed their best:
Come—try their wisdom to digest. . . ."

Said I: "Alas! I am not able;
I lay my cards upon the table,
And with deep shame and blame avow
I am too old to read you now;
So I will lock you in glass cases
And shun your sad, reproachful faces."

* * * * * * * * *

My library is noble planned,
Yet in it desolate I stand;
And though my thousand books I prize,
Feeling a witling in their eyes,
I turn from them in weariness
To wallow in the Daily Press.

For, oh, I never, never will
The noble field of knowledge till:
I pattern words with artful tricks,
As children play with painted bricks,
And realize with futile woe,
Nothing I know—nor want to know.

My library has windowed nooks;
And so I turn from arid books
To vastitude of sea and sky,
And like a child content am I
With peak and plain and brook and tree,
Crying: "Behold! the books for me:
Nature, be thou my Library!"
Fine NY Times tribute to WFB:
"Miles Gone By" is an elegant book, one of Buckley's best, and the man the reader meets in these pages is the Platonic ideal of a dinner companion, a raconteur whose pomposity is calculated and whose self-deprecation charms...

Witty, deft in argument, willing to assert that the secular left had no monopoly on truth, he helped change the way the country thought of the right, beginning with his first book, "God and Man at Yale." Published in 1951, it is one of those books people talk about but today hardly ever read. Its essential argument was that the loftier realms of higher education were increasingly hostile to religion and to conservative viewpoints. "I believe that the duel between Christianity and atheism is the most important in the world," read a controversial passage in "God and Man." "I further believe that the struggle between individualism and collectivism is the same struggle reproduced on another level." (Interestingly, this precise formulation was not Buckley's but his mentor's, a Yale professor named Willmoore Kendall, who edited the manuscript. In part out of loyalty and in part because he was "tickled by the audacity of the sally," Buckley writes, he never disavowed it.)
       
From Our Church Bulletin:
A researcher asked twelve volunteers to assist her in studying how the general public would respond to a person with a physical deformity. Each one of the volunteers was placed in a separate room without mirrors. Next, a make-up artist was sent in to each room to paint a lifelike facial scar on the left cheek of each volunteer. When this was done, the researcher then came into each room and privately told each volunteer that she had to make some last minute adjustments to their scar. While pretending to make adjustments to the scar, the researcher actually wiped off the make-up. The volunteers, however, still believed that they had a scar on their left cheek. They were then sent out to various locations to observe how the public responded to their scar. Upon returning at the end of the day, each person reported that they were treated rudely and that people stared at the "scar".

The study provided a good lesson in self-image. If we dislike ourselves, we may convince ourselves that others dislike us as well and we will treat them accordingly. How many arguments and personality conflicts could be avoided if only we remembered that we are all made in the image and likeness of God.
Spontaneous Prose

Caught a bit of Douglas Brinkley on C-Span explaining the discipline that went into Jack Kerouac's On the Road. Said he'd studied Shakespeare, Proust, Dickens, Twain and was extremely well-read. The prose might've looked spontaneous but it wasn't. He didn't create it by "booze and osmosis".
Comedy Time

Since the national strike in Nigeria began, I've received far fewer scammer emails.
_

In a multi-cat household, can you tell which cat produced which hairballs just by the sole of your foot?
_

  ..borrowed from "I'm an Ordinary Man" from Lerner & Lowe's "My Fair Lady", who borrowed from George Bernard Shaw:

Pre-Conversion

I'm an ordinary man;
Who desires nothing more
Than just the ordinary chance
To live exactly as he likes
And do precisely what he wants.
An average man am I,
Of no eccentric whim;
Who likes to live his life
Free of strife,
Doing whatever he thinks is best for him.
Just an ordinary man.

But let the Divine in your life
And your serenity is through!
He'll redecorate your soul,
From the cellar to the mole;
Then go on to the enthralling
Fun of overhauling
You.
...

I'm a quiet living man
Who prefers to spend the evenings
In the silence of his room;
Who likes an atmosphere as restful
As an undiscovered tomb.
A pensive man am I
Of philosophic joys;
Who likes to meditate,
Contemplate,
Free from humanity's mad, inhuman noise.
Just a quiet living man.

But let the Godhead in your life
And your sabbatical is through!
In a line that never ends
Come an army of his friends;
Come to jabber and to chatter
And to tell Him what the matter is with you.

Post-Conversion:

I've grown accustomed to His face...
He really makes the day begin...

October 16, 2004

Goldbergian Column

Interesting Goldberg column......
John Kerry's...faith is clear on abortion. It's pretty darn murky on, say, affirmative action.

I say you shouldn't pick and choose, but I understand that sometimes you have to — but in completely the opposite way John Kerry picks and chooses. Kerry invokes God's guidance on the little stuff, the easy stuff, the boilerplate. He turns his back to God on the big issue, abortion (and, with a wink, gay marriage).

It seems to me this is exactly backwards. God doesn't have a position on the minimum wage or Superfund, so politicians shouldn't feel the need to consult Him about that stuff. It's only on the grave fundamental questions in politics that God should speak to one's conscience. Thomas More didn't put his life on the line about how Henry VIII handled crop rotation.
Week in Review

I still can’t get the scene of Michael J. Fox, ‘80s sitcom hero who held the Republican fort against hippie parents, out of my mind: He was sitting stage left of Therese Heinz Kerry at the debate. The dissonance rankled. Must be a bad dream.

Meanwhile the Red Sox dropped two games quicker than Madonna switches religions. I'm starting to worry about that famous "seventh-game Red Sox guarantee" since going 3-1 from here on out against the Yanks is a tall order. I sat down in my recliner, beer at the ready, and Game 1 was over before my Schlitz lost its head. Schilling looked like a Cincinnati Red’s fifth starter. This was disconcerting because this is the real World Series. A Yankees-Cardinals series might be mildly interesting but nothing compared to seeing if the Ruthian curse gets a contract extension. The cumulative suffering of Boston fans makes the games interesting in a Bonnie Tyler “see how much their ol’ heart can take” sort of way.

What else? Oh yeah the debate. Well I’m prejudiced. I’d always been ABK man – “anybody but Kerry” - even back in the early primaries. Embarrassment has ensued, since it’s easier on the gullet to hear Howard Dean espousing anti-life positions than a fellow Catholic. I watched the debate in the juvenile need to be privy to the “definining moment” should a defining moment come, i.e. should Bush say something like “there you go again”. Or should he make the faux paus that ends the deadlock. But no faux paus’s or defining moments came so I was left holding the bag. A movie without an end.

It bothers me that this election fleshed out political leanings quicker than a blue-tick hound. I mean who can remain agnostic against this backdrop? Necessarily we see Peter Nixon become the apostle to the Left and Elena the apostle to the Right. Is that the way it should be? No. Peter Nixon should be an apostle to us all, as should Elena. The fracture is much more painful amid our bishops. Bill O’Reilly joked the other day: “so it’s a sin to vote for Kerry in Denver but not in Pennsylvania?” and that's not so though it does have a bit of truth-scent to it.

Update/Disclaimer: This was written while basking in the afterglow of Guinness Stout. I was in an kumbaya mood, a "why can't we all get along" idyll. This was written purely for entertainment porpoises.

October 15, 2004

Fictional Friday

The diagnosis was the obscure condition known as “Clutter Mania III”, a form of madness precipitated by a house with too much litter. There were spent clothes, books, papers, pencil holders, objects d' Art such as an “I Got Smashed In Texas” mug, CDs, DVDs, cheap Haitian saucers, signed baseballs and souvenir statuaries. Magazines were an especial nemesis: they sprouted like kudzu over the room landscape without the decency of being pornographic.

It all started with the innocent purchase of a $29.95 plastic fountain with rocks that was supposed to micmic a waterfall. It arrived in the mail and he plugged it in but could hear the motor, soft but annoying. It sounded like water falling over an engine and made him anything but peaceful. It sat around for 2.5 years, out of respect for the twenty-nine and 95/100 he’d written the check out for. Finally the day came when he threw it away and he did so with gleeful panache! "Be ye gone Satan, and all ye works", he said, exorcising his need to be annoyed by its presence for the 880th day. But it set in motion all the symptoms of advanced CM III because he didn’t stop there. To the trash went his alarm clock, a Redskins sweatshirt, the desk, a printer, the kitchen sink...
Pete & Repeat

Finished Pete Rose's book and I'm struck by the parallels between him and Bill Clinton. Both lied with conviction and were given opportunities to confess and "cop a plea" along the way. Both forgave everyone except their prosecutor: Rose saves his bitterest words for John Dowd while Clinton bore the most contempt for Ken Starr. At the news conference banning Pete, Bart Giamatti said "no man, no matter how exalted, is above the game" and Ken Starr said "no President is above the law".

Clinton received an arguably reasonable punishment: impeachment without having to leave office. Rose was banned for life. It helped Clinton that he had far more apologists.
Thoughts

How can the way be narrow and yet He draw all things to Himself? I recently saw a physical manifestation of the answer:



*

I guess it isn't surprising that when Jesus gave Mary as mother to John and John as son to Mary it would reverberate to every Christian's benefit for eternity. What you see with Jesus isn't what you get - you get much more! In the flesh, it's seen as merely a custodial arrangement. In the spirit, it redounds beyond itself.

*

I love the first Luminous Mystery. Jesus, after accepting John's baptism of mere water, received the sensible presence of the Holy Spirit. The humility in accepting a "second-rate" baptism resulted in the unanticipated reward of the descent of the Holy Spirit and words of consolation from the Father. A powerful lesson.
Prohibit Not Ye Average Joe

I didn't even know there's still a Prohibition Party.

Reminds me of a story my friend Ham o' Bone told me. His dad was a minister way up in Maine. Years ago he ran for office basically as a prohibitionist and Bone dutifully knocked on doors and handed out flyers - while half-drunk! Bone never had any qualms about quaffing the fermented grape.

Speaking of politics, check out this site. Do you want to vote for an average joe instead of Bush or Kerry? Well here you go - literally.
Ohio means "Good Morning" in Japanese...

...but on 11/2 "Ohio" means saying good night to one of the two presidential candidates. We have a bandwagon tendency here that is irritating - we've voted for the presidential winner every election for the last forty years. I fear that if Bush is not ahead in the polls on election day a few voters might be tempted to pull the lever for Kerry out of that bandwagon "be with a winner" mentality. In a close election it only takes a few.

There are an amazing 700,000 new voters registered in Ohio and there are reports of college students changing their voter registration from their state of origin since we're a battleground state. And believe me, there are a LOT of colleges and universities in this state. Most new registrants tend to vote Democratic. Republicans are more anal-retentive and conscientious about voting, even when it means little. Which it doesn't this time around.

So...In '00, Bush got 2,351,209 Ohio votes to Gore's 2,186,190. If half of those new registrants vote (i.e. 350,000) and if 70% of them vote Kerry, then that's 245,000 Kerry votes and that, my friends, would give the state and nation and two soon-to-be-vacant Supreme Court chairs to Sen. John F. Kerry. I hope I did everything I could to avoid that, although I fear I haven't.

*

Bush's dire situation in Ohio reminds me of the Red Sox's. (Cue segue alert!) Came across this hilarious Soxian prayer which even a Reds fan can appreciate:
O Loving Father of all that is good on the diamond, hear our prayer!
The Holy Idiots of Landsdown Street are in grave danger,
Falling before the mercenary hordes of the Evil One.
Give them strength in this, their hour of need.

St. Cronin, Perpetual Manager, and St Yaz, Most Immaculate Captain, pray for us.

The lineup, O lord, being so full of Your Idiotic Servants -
Manny and Ortiz, Millah and Trot, Tek and Mueller,
Bellhorn and He Who Has Replaced the Whiney One-
Grant that they may hit many RBI singles and doubles and dingers, which are so pleasing to You.

St. Ted, Holy Kid of the Homer, and St. Pudge, The Ever-Clutch, pray for us.
Pelagian Peale?

I read Norman Vincent Peale's "Power of Positive Thinking" many years ago and think mostly positive thoughts about it. After all, repeating affirming bible verses daily is a good thing. But I wonder, in retrospect, if he was preaching the doctrine of Pelagius? The whole enterprise seemed to be using psychology to achieve closeness to God, a purely "natural" religion rather than a supernatural one. If every day you say a hundred times "I can do all things through Christ which strengthens me" are you saying it because you believe your saying it will accomplish anything or because it is Christ who is doing the strengthening?

I'm reading the Book of Judges now and Yahweh went to prodigious lengths to show that it was he giving the Israelites victory over Midian. Yahweh told Gideon to send 21,700 of his 22,000 man army home. Gideon would fight in tiny numbers to glorify God and leave no doubt of the power source:   The LORD said to Gideon, "You have too many soldiers with you for me to deliver Midian into their power, lest Israel vaunt itself against me and say, 'My own power brought me the victory.'
-
I recall our retreat master saying that Original Sin was not something Jews believe or believed. Original sin is a Christian doctrine, something that became obvious only in hindsight of the redemption of Christ because redemption implies that you need redeemed from something. I came across this about Dr. Laura while googling for Peale & Pelagius:
Orthodox Judaism, and consequently Dr. Laura, take a much more benign view of man and his sinfulness. Dr. Louis Goldberg details this:

“Orthodox Jews and Conservative Jews deny that man’s nature is basically evil and always inclined to do evil. ... In summary, none of the Jewish theological camps teach that man is born with a sinful nature which will ultimately condemn him.”...

While we may help our self-image by doing right, our right-doing will never effect righteousness before God. In making man autonomous, Dr. Laura is the perfect (or imperfect) blend of Pharisee and Pelagian...

October 14, 2004

Good Point from the Internet Monk
God's relationship with this fallen world allows terrible things to happen. Go back to Genesis 3 and remember what happened at the beginning. That is what we are living out. It is a miracle of God's grace that He didn't press the "delete" button and immediately "reformat" the entire creation from the first, tragic rebellion against Him. Instead, God is redeeming creation through Jesus, and as the cross reveals, it is not by removing Himself and His purposes from human sin and pain, or by preventing those realities.

I often ask my students to imagine four families. One chooses to not have children. The second has children, but takes the infants to a surgeon and has brain surgery performed. This surgery prevents the children from ever rising to the point of being able to make wrong or evil choices. The third family raises their children in isolation from any danger or temptation. The children stay at home, and never participate in sports or have friends. The last family has children, and allows them to grow up with skinned knees, choices, risks, mistakes and consequences. At one point, one of their children is badly injured in a bike accident.

Which is these four families has the healthiest kind of love? Which of these four families most mirrors the relationship between God and human beings?
Bad News

...for cell phone users. I wonder if holding the phone a bit farther away would help.
Where Have You Gone, Joe DiMaggio?

It was disturbing to see Jimmy Carter sitting next to and lending respectability to filmmaker Michael Moore during the Democratic National Convention. But worse was the news that at Emory University recently Carter said his favorite movies were Casablanca and Fahrenheit 9/11.

That he would endorse such an obviously dishonest movie is troubling. I've always respected his "walk the walk" Christianity, especially in regards to helping the poor through his efforts with Habitat for Humanity. I was privileged to hear him give the sermon at his church during a '99 visit to Georgia.

Perhaps he subscribes to the end justifying the means. He wants Kerry to win and doesn't apparently care if a dishonest film can be used towards that "good" end. Certainly I'm for Bush as much as he's for Kerry and can't say what I would do in his situation. Still, isn't it remarkable how as our culture rushes towards callowness we can appear to look more and more mature if only by comparison - even if we just stand still?
News Maxed Out

I feel discombobulated by the sudden news of my bishop's retirement, by the Red Sox loss, and by the usual post-debate political hangover although the latter was somewhat assuaged by the lovely prose of Percy's The Moviegoer. Between piquant descriptions of New Orleans he expresses a tragicomic truth about the human condition:
As I watched, there awoke in me an immense curiosity. I was onto something. I vowed that if I ever got out of this fix, I would pursue the search. Naturally, as soon as I recovered and got home, I forgot all about it.

October 13, 2004

Rating the Moderators

Lehrer-to-Gibson-to-Schieffer. An triple play of conservative unfriendlies. Would a Lehrer-to-Russert-to-Hume have been asking too much? Yes, the parties themselves negotiate the moderators, which means to steer clear of the Democrats on that panel if you need to haggle.

I have mixed emotions concerning the differences between Lehrer and Schieffer. Lehrer was robotic but egoless. He knew the debate wasn't about him and didn't entertain or interject himself. He was the professional.

Schieffer was the opposite. He interjected himself wherever he could. Towards the end he mentioned what they had in common - not the candidates but himself and the candidates. (Strong wives and daughters.) His avuncularity and informality were disarming though.

Worse was the cloying bias in his questions. Cliff May on Schieffer's framing of the question on raising the minimum wage: "This is the problem with such moderators. They don’t know how to be neutral. They assume that a government-mandated higher minimum wage ameliorates poverty. They don’t believe – or don’t understand -- that it may mean that low-skilled workers will be priced out of the work force and into poverty." By the time I got done listening to Schieffer's stemwinder I was outraged and ready to call my Congressman and ask for a higher minimum wage. Seriously. But whether you buy May's economic views or not, it shows that Schieffer doesn't. Which we ought not to know, right?

Sigh. I imagine an alternate universe where a moderator asks Sen. Kerry: "Sir, you said you believe that life begins at conception. How do you reconcile this with your pro-choice stand?" Sure, we already know the answer. But we already knew the answer to 90% of the questions tonight and at least this one didn't start from a left-wing bias.
True...

JFK IS MY BISHOP [Kate O'Beirne]Forget the Bishops, Kerry's higher authority is JFK. His ridiculous answer as to what science and reason tell us about beginning of human life akin to Catholics' belief in the Assumption or the Immaculate Conception. He goes on to say that faith informs his positions on poverty and the environment - why should he force those views on non-believers? I guess I have to consult JFK's teachings.
Comic Relief

The Man who Knew Too Little is hilarious, the opening scene priceless. Bill Murray's character hands his passport to a British customs official and says, "Good day, chap!". The clerk tries to hide a look of pain. Murray's character says, "I just flew in from America. I'm an American." Hours later they are still chatting. The friendly garrulous American is completely oblivious to hints and the British "chap" unwilling to be too direct due to British reserve. Murray confides he doesn't want to look like a tourist, hilarious on the face of it. Reminds me of the time I met an Australian girl at an Irish B&B, who, upon learning I was an American said that was obvious given my clothes, accent, etc... She wasn't impressed although I recognize it could be less my nationality and more a lack of personal magnetism.

But I digress. I think the movie strikes a chord on some level because Murray is engaged in a very dangerous situation but is completely oblivious to it and his performance is improved by his ignorance. There seems a sort of protection in his ignorance.

We are, of course, likewise engaged in a dangerous situation. We are on a path towards Heaven while having to pass by the Dragon, as I think St. Cyril of Jerusalem put it. Even if we manage to convince ourselves we aren't in danger, we need only look at the culture to gain a sense of urgency.

This morning I was reading John Henry Newman's blog. Or at least that's how I view his collection of personal letters. He probably felt more free to give his opinions in the "privacy" of a letter just as we are more likely to be truthful in the "privacy" of an ephemeral blog. Newman wrote about how he misses old friends who've died, but who are now outside judgment: "I am still on trial and have judgment to come. The idea of judgment is the first principle of religion, as being involved in the sentiment of conscience - and, as life goes on, it becomes very overpowering. Nor do the good tidings of Christianity reverse it, unless we go into the extreme of Calvinism or Methodism with the doctrine of personal assurance. Otherwise, the more one has received, the more one has to answer for. We can but throw ourselves on the mercy of God, of which one's whole life is a long experience." So it seems Catholics know too much, or at least have received much, and must bear the additional responsibility cheerfully. Fr. Corbett remarked on how contingent and extraneous we are, and he was very sure what God wouldn't say to him at his death. He wouldn't say, "Fine job! I couldn't have done it without you!". No, He bloody well could do without us. Instead, there might be criticisms, but Fr. Corbett's attitude was one of sweet resignation. God is our Father and we hope to be inheritors, and that is a sweet part of reality.
Oh No!

The Alta-Vista Translator service seems to me an underutilized resource. Here's "He ain't heavy, he's my brother" in German!

Er Ain't Schwer, He's Meine Bruder

Lyrik Die Straße ist,
mit vielen eine Wicklung Umdrehung lang,
die uns führt zu, wem wo, das wo aber I'm weiß,
das stark ist, stark genug, um ihn zu tragen
er schweres ain't - he's mein Bruder

weiß So auf gehen uns, seine Wohlfahrt sind mein Interesse,
das keine Belastung zu entblössen ist er,
we'll erhalten dort für mich wissen, daß er mich nicht
er schweres ain't - he's mein Bruder

And how about:

"MacArthur Park is melting in the dark
All the sweet, green icing flowing down
Someone left the cake out in the rain
I don't think that I can take it
'Cause it took so long to bake it
And I'll never have that recipe again
Oh, no!"

in Italian:

il parco del MacArthur sta fondendo nell'oscurità tutto il dolce, la glassa verde che fluisce giù qualcuno a sinistra la torta fuori nella pioggia I don't pensa che possa prendergli 'Cause che ha preso in modo da desidera per cuocerla ed I'll non hanno mai ancora quella ricetta OH, no!

October 12, 2004

Bracing article on the perils of downplaying unpalatable doctrines:
Anyone who has followed the path taken by Protestant theology in the past two centuries, and by Catholic theology in the past four decades, already knows the point of this story: All the costume changes in the world won’t matter if the messenger has squandered his treasure by altering his message to suit the convenience of the audience. For Ratzinger, creeds matter only if what they proclaim is true, and if Christians deep down don’t really think so, then all the translation strategies in the world will mean nothing.

I maintain that the Christian dispensation is much more difficult to believe than it is to understand, for its message can be boiled down to a five-word sentence of remarkable simplicity but one that represents a radical challenge to the intellect: We die before we live. Or again, another five-word kerygma: We meet Christ in death. In each case, five simple, easy-to-understand words, but ones that nearly everything about the way the modern world is structured make difficult to believe. In an age of popularized books on neurology from the pen of Oliver Sacks and when most people are intuitively aware of the dependence of consciousness on brain chemistry (just from living in a “Prozac Nation” or from witnessing a relative suffer from Alzheimer’s disease, if from nothing else), these two five-word sentences will immediately strike the hearer as easy to understand but difficult to believe.
They dropped like Flakes
Emily Dickinson

They dropped like Flakes—
They dropped like Stars—
Like Petals from a Rose—
When suddenly across the June
A wind with fingers—goes—

They perished in the Seamless Grass—
No eye could find the place—
But God can summon every face
Of his Repealless—List.
Moving Patrick Reardon

    ...reflection:
Why should they receive a preference that the Florida Supreme Court recently denied to Terri Schiavo? Putting it plainly, wherein is the life of Terri Schiavo found wanting except that she somehow failed to be a movie star?
Succumbing to Memes

Name THREE of your...

1. Pet Peeves: Catholics for Kerry, succumbing to memes, having pet peeves
2. Favorite Sounds: autumnal locusts, violins, bagpipes
3. Biggest Fears: hell, mental illness, cancer
4. Biggest Challenges: 1 Corinthians 13
5. Favorite Department Stores: "Favorite department stores" is an oxymoron in my creed
6. Most Used Words: the, and, or
7. Favorite Pizza Toppings: pepperoni, extra sauce
8. Favorite Cartoon Characters: Bugs Bunny, Wile E. Coyote, Underdog
9. Movies Recently Watched: The Man Who Knew Too Little, The Song of Bernadette
10. Favorite Fruits & Vegetables: blackberries, peaches, asparagus
9 out of 10 Writers Agree...

Novelists are voting for Kerry, perhaps revealing their bias towards fiction and flexible characters. Thomas Mallon was a voice of reason and Richard Dooling played the role of adult:
More than any other election in recent memory, this one reminds me of Henry Adams' observation that politics is the systematic organization of hatreds.

The left-wing political road rage directed at George W. Bush for being dumb and lying about the war reminds me of nothing so much as the right-wing obsessive invective directed at Bill Clinton for being smart and lying about sex. Rush Limbaugh versus Michael Moore, and let the man nursing the most unrequited rage win. The DRAMA and spectacle of the election will be fascinating to watch, but novelists, even more than actors, should be political agnostics.
   But not bloggers.
Imagined John Kerry Speech Under Different Circumstances

I'm not going to go as far as some on my side of the aisle who say that impeachment hearings ought be brought against my opponent for his negligence and lack of leadership. But I think it is fair to point out that Saddam Hussein was not an unknown quantity. Saddam violated the Gulf War ceasefire, thumbed his nose at twelve U.N. resolutions, funded terrorists and stockpiled WMDs according to just about every intelligence agency in the world. George Bush did not make a prudential judgment in ignoring a grave threat, a threat he should've addressed militarily since all peaceful means, including economic sanctions, had been exhausted. The fundamental job description of the President is the protection of America and George W. Bush failed miserably. I pledge that I will defend America.

- (Given at a luncheon on Aug. 12, 2003, one month after linkage found between Saddam Hussein and an anthrax attack which killed two thousand in Chicago.)
   Spanning the Globe to Bring You the Constant Variety of Posts

HO-HOS FOR HUMANITY! - smockmomma on the news that fat might be a stem cell source.

501(c)(3) be damned - why can't a single bishop stand up, in the wake of events like last Friday's debate and publicly say to this creep, "Senator Kerry, stop publicly mischaracterizing the Catholic faith. Stop using your Catholic identity to somehow justify positions that are in direct contradiction to the Catholic faith. By doing so, you are "teaching" people about what it means to be Catholic. Do you know what, buddy? That's not your job. That's ours. Just stop it." I've been saying this, off and on for months. To me, this silence, this implicit permission given to Kerry to use his deficient understanding of the Catholic faith for political purposes is inexcusable. - Amy Welborn

In case you missed my subtle big announcement here, I'm pregnant. Gulp. I'll bet you haven't met too many gals who can celebrate their 25th wedding anniversary and announce their 7th pregnancy within 10 weeks or so of each other! But hey it happened to me! Statistically speaking this is a miracle. From what I could find out on line, your chances of conceiving after age 40 drop down to around 4%. - Elena of My Domestic Church

When I have before me a huge piece of exotically delicious dessert, there is no doubt but that I want that dessert. Everything inside of me screams out automatically, "Eat it now, before someone else does!" I can't control that desire, for it is a passion. I want the dessert. But, at the same time, my mind says not to eat it, because I'm watching my weight and am interested in being healthy. And so, even if offered, I can truthfully say, "I don't want a piece, thank you." That is the active power of the will, and that is something I can control. What I feel like is out of my hands, and I can't be responsible for that; what I choose is where morality starts, and this is the true testing ground of good and bad. Apply that to human relations, and it is the testing ground of real love. - Fr. Jim of Dapped Things

Despair is the absolute extreme of self-love. It is reached when a person deliberately turns his back on all help from anyone else in order to taste the rotten luxury of knowing himself to be lost...Despair is the ultimate development of a pride so great and so stiff-necked that it selects the absolute misery of damnation rather than accept happiness from the hands of God and thereby acknowledge that He is above us and that we are not capable of fulfilling our destiny ourselves. But a person who is truly humble cannot despair, because in a humble person there is no longer any such thing as self-pity. - Thomas Merton, via MamaT of Summa Mamas

Interesting excerpts from St. Jerome's letter to Ctesiphon..."1. What the Greeks call pasio and what we call passions,---for example, vexation and gladness, hope and fear, two of which relate to the present and two to the future,---[the Pelagians] assert can be expelled completely from our minds; and they say that every root and fiber of vice can be removed from a man by meditation on virtue and the constant practice of virtue.... 6. It is not enough for me that God has given me grace once, but He must give it always. I ask, that I may receive; and when I have received, I ask again. I am covetous of receiving God's bounty. He is never slow in giving, nor am I ever weary of receiving. The more I drink, the more thirsty I become...7. Listen, I ask you, only listen to [Pelagius'] profanation. "If," he says, "if I want to bend my finger, move my hand, sit, stand, walk, run, spit, use two little fingers to blow my nose, empty my bowels, or urinate, is it always necessary for me to have God's help?" Listen, you blasphemous ingrate, and hear the preaching of the Apostle: "If you are eating, if you are drinking, or if you are doing anything else, do all in the name of God." - Bill of Summa Minutiae

You've seen enough of it here, I need hardly say more except to note how very much I enjoyed every aspect of this book. (But what is blogging but the art of saying more when nothing more need be said?) - Steven of Flos Carmeli

The Church of England is distributing a new order of service in which Anglicans will pray for the dinner. No, not pray to receive, but to intercede on behalf of the dinner itself, or more accurately, the animals it once was. They’re being asked to pray for the soul of the animal.-Domenico of Bettnet

I may be allowed to not exercise my right to self-defence, but that doesn't mean I am allowed to neglect my duty to defend someone else. And public authorities -- such as Presidents of nations -- are supposed to exercise their authority not for themselves, but for others. For the U.S.A. to not have intervened would have been like telling the citizens of Iraq to just keep turning the other cheek. It would have been no better than for a rich man to tell a poor man to "go in peace, be warm and filled". Sorry, but faith without works is dead. - Fr. Tom of Waiting in Joyful Hope

I'm Bill White, and I approved this blog. --Bill White of Summa Minutiae
Excerpt from Philip Roth's The Counterlife
"This artistic dedication of yours is slightly provincial, you know. It's far more metropolitan to have a slightly anarchic view of life. Yours only seems anarchic and isn't at all. About standards you're something of a hick. Thinking things matter."

October 10, 2004

Notes from Lecture by Fr. Corbett, O.P.

God is “Other” or “different”, the original meanings of “holy”. The refrain “Holy, holy, holy Lord, God of power and might…” would be better translated as “Different, different, different Lord, God…” What is this difference? Not his power, but his forgiveness of sins. A king on earth has power and seeks to be served but the King forgives and serves.

The great tragedy of the Fall was that we lost knowledge of the real God. Eve thought God was putting something over on her, that God wasn’t trustworthy, and man’s mind is frozen in time in that cast just as the angel's decision to serve or forsake God became changeless. While made in the image and likeness of God, the Fall turned that around and made us imagine God in our image and likeness. The reason that God, in the OT, did not permit images of Himself is because He knew we would make Him in our image – that is, ugly. Take a look sometime at the Babylonian idols at the Natural History museum. They were ugly. Beasts. We made God look destructive and sadistically powerful. We always tend to think God is trying to put something over on us because that is what we do.

Jesus taught us the real image of God. In the Garden of Eden the first Adam didn’t trust God; in the Garden of Gethsemane the Second Adam trusted God under much more adverse circumstances. He taught us how to trust. For humans, our last decision for or against God is the one we’ll have through all eternity. With Jesus, his last choice to obey God and to forgive was his final one and the one he has through all eternity, so we can therefore count on his eternal intercession as our High Priest...You can only father others if you yourself have been properly fathered. The Father taught the Son how to father and the Son raised up a new generation of fathers.

*

Babies begin life not knowing they are different from their mother. They don't conceive of their body as separate from their mother's for awhile. The father, by contrast, is the “Other”. The stranger. Boys have to distance themselves from mothers as a model while daughters have an easier time since their model is their mother. A son must find the father to know his true identity. The reason Schwarznegger’s “girly men” resonated so profoundly is because of this fear, at a biological level, of having a man's identity be made again indistinguishable from his mother's.

Father is the stranger with power. That is how we relate to God without the Holy Spirit. You are then still under the Law. He might be obeyed and the rules kept but the Father is still a stranger. Those who only seek to keep the rules do so because they trust themselves, not God. They want to know what the rules to guarantee their own security. Karl Barth was right when he said “we are saved not by ‘therefore’ but by ‘nevertheless’”.

*

In the “Our Father” Jesus was actually praying for his own death when he said “May your name be sanctified” (i.e. “hallowed be thy name”). That phrase was only used twice in the Old Testament and both times His name was sanctified by the radical forgiveness of sins, which the Cross would manifest...
RUN -   George Strait song

If there's a plane or a bus leavin' Dallas I hope you're on it
If there's a train movin' fast down the tracks I hope you caught it
'Cause I swear out there ain't where you oughta be
So catch a ride catch a cab don't ya know I miss ya bad
But don't you walk to me

Baby run cut a path across the blue skies
Straight in a straight line you can't get here fast enough
Find a truck and fire it up lean on the gas and off the clutch
Leave Dallas in the dust I need you in a rush
So baby run

If you ain't got a suitcase get a box or an old brown paper sack
Pack it light or pack it heavy take a truck take a Chevy
Baby just come back
There's a short cut to the highway out of town why don't you take it
Don't let that speed limit slow you down go on and break it

Baby run cut a path across the blue skies
Straight in a straight line you can't get here fast enough
Find a truck and fire it up lean on the gas and off the clutch
Leave Dallas in the dust I need you in a rush
So baby run
Recap

Got back from a retreat over the weekend. Lecture notes from the friar forthcoming. Met another wannabe writer who's working on a book about Lincoln's funeral train. He's read every how-to-write book ever written. (I've read none of them because, dammit, I use nonchalance and sloth as protective colorings.) He's also actually done research, interviewing folks in Plain City and beyond. He was riveted by Bone's tales of screenplays and agents though I don't think I did Bone's plot justice when forced to relay it. But maybe it was enough that he appreciated the seriousity Bone manifested. There's something inspiring in someone determined to write the next Killer Angels just as there is in the soul longing to become a saint.

October 08, 2004

Polarizing

On why there is so much polarization between the parties...

War and capitalism are, to put it mildly, unpalatable. War, even in the case of self-defense, is brutal and cruel. Capitalism is by definition a transactional mutual using: "you scratch my back, I'll scratch yours". So conservatives defending the need to go to war or defending the producers of wealth in a society will always have some 'splainin' to do, as Ricky Ricardo said. Pacifists and socialists smugly enjoy the wind at their back because peace and income redistribution are wonderful things, inasmuch as they are feasible.

Over the years the conservative has grown accustomed to being the "bad" guy and the liberal to being the "good" guy, or, more charitably, conservatives the father figure and liberals the mother. But then something very odd happened - the mother party refused to defend her babies, the weakest among us! And so the conservative party, by default or providence, became the party defending life.

This has produced profound dislocation because of our desire to think well of ourselves. With conservatives there is a constant temptation towards self-righteousness in the wake of experiencing the clear moral high ground and for liberals there is a constant temptation to became bitter in losing it and to manifest that by stubbornly changing the subject.
Single Man

A single-issue voter...
Election & Football Distractions

The blogger at Collected Miscellany is experiencing book burnout. A commenter named Ed said:
I'd suggest, Kevin, that you read something fun instead of the intellectual or nonfiction books you're pining for. The mind really does need stories and poetry to live on and when it's denied from time to time, the result is, much like one of the unfortunate results perpetuated by bad English teachers, an aversion to something as magical as reading.
Dramatic Coverage Of Ham of Bone's First 5 Mile Race...(written last year)
Shortly before mile 5, one of the gentleman that I had egregiously bumped at the beginning of the race began to overtake me. He was running with a female companion and sported a near Clydesdale-like build. (The Clydesdale division of the race identified any runners who weighed over 200 pounds.) As they passed me, he hissed, "There's the assh*?! that took off so fast at the start." To add injury to insult, my body began to rebel against the quickened pace that I had temporarily adopted to keep up with the young beauties. I was instantly beset by disorienting nausea and stiffening joints. To stumble to the edge of the road and vomit was the only conceivable option. To put my head between my legs and kiss the race goodbye was the only vision that I could see at the present time. I had reached my lowest point in the race. This was a personal Valley Forge, a defining moment in my first race, could my mind declare independence from the pain of my body and win the battle so that I could finish the race.

Reaching for any piece of pyschological ground that I could find, I made an observation and one change to my running style...and THAT, as they say, made all the difference. The observation was that I was back on Cleveland Ave heading south, and way up ahead I could see runners turning left onto Naughten St - the torture would be over soon. I was almost done. Less than a mile to go! Wow! To control the nausea, I began running with my head down, staring at the road beneath my feet. The gray surface moved swiftly, and my eyes soon lost the capacity to focus on anything. Gone was the leering Nazi that I had bumped at the start of the race, gone was the buildings and cars of downtown Columbus. I was in purgatory, a hospital for the mentally ill, I was hanging with Salinger's Holden, getting treatment for unknown ailments, being made stronger, faster, better. Like Steve Austin, I emerged over the next half mile rebuilt and renewed, purged of sins both imaginary and real. My pace quickened as I climbed the hill of Nationwide Blvd just before High Street. I nearly screamed primally "Yes!!!!!" ala Marv Albert as I passed first one runner then another. My ears caught the exquisite sound of my wife and two boys yelling "Go Daddy!" and I looked over to posed while Vicki snapped a picture. Then came the finish line. All alone I ran across and under and through it. A Titan who had lost the battle but won the war, and the weight of the world fell away from me for awhile.
- Ham of Bone
More Old Writing...

To this kid, we didn't grow up in a country, state, or city. Those were abstractions made by adults drawing arbitrary map lines. I grew up in a neighborhood. So contrary to the maps, I surveyed the land with my sponge-kid eyes, and soaked in the geography. There was the 'old neighborhood', which I held in the same esteem and teary-eyedness that any European immigrant would've when remembering the old country. (I had been ripped from my home of seven years and forced into bigger, newer housing two miles away by my 'rents).

Travel was our earliest job description. It was what we did when we got up on a summer morning. We'd get on our bikes and explore, or 'splore' as my brother called it before his overbite was corrected. We hiked the mountains, treading on private property but we were kids and felt immune. Laws were made by adults for adults. We traveled the streams of our town and the river Miami; we knew the creek system like a doctor knows the circulatory system. We'd try to find new subdivisions and find suburban roads we'd ever seen before.

Some of the streets had French-sounding, latte-sipping names ("LaMonte") while others sounded like huge spreads out in the old West ("Pondersosa"). The main street was modestly called "Pleasant", not exceptional. In our little neighborhood I was upset that the main drag had the same name as the city. It seemed a crisis of the imaginatory system, like they'd run out of street names: "Well Fred, I'm tired, its 5:00, just re-use the city name". It was confusing to a 6yr old, who reasoned that Mom was correct when she said she wouldn't name my new brother "Tom" because people wouldn't know which Tom, the same I figured could be said of the street & city.
Barzun Review by Roger Kimball

...via a piquant new blog named Taliesan:
If From Dawn to Decadence is partly a celebration of the West, it is also an elegy for its passing....Although the picture Mr. Barzun paints is one of cultural desolation, he nevertheless manages to end on a note of cautious optimism. Even if present trends continue and society becomes more routinized and culturally sterile, human ingenuity can surely be counted upon to precipitate a rebellion against the spread of bureaucratized futility. Sooner or later, some few intrepid souls will turn with new curiosity to the neglected past and use it “to create a new present,” discovering along the way “what a joy it is to be alive.” The forces of decadence that Mr. Barzun describes are formidably potent. But decadence is no more inevitable than progress. Myopia is perennial, despair a temptation to be resisted. One never knows what reparations await the touch of fresh energies. Eugène Delacroix put it well: “Those very ones who believe that everything has been said and done, will greet you as new and yet will close the door behind you. And then they will say again that everything has been done and said.”

October 07, 2004

Novelistic Tendencies

Since it's national write-a-novel month, I thought I'd explore some of the common rationalizations for not writing one.

First is talent. One senses the world needs another bad novel like it needs another  -- (provide your own metaphor - had I the talent I'd supply it for you).

Second, perhaps we're not drinking enough. I talk a good game, and sure there's always a Guinness or five on Friday night, but I don't drink near what I used to. And a scientific periodical mentions a connection between drinking and writing talent:

Dear Concerned Cad:
All my favorite authors and poets (Hemingway, Faulkner, Pound, Byron) were alcoholics. We’re they great because or in spite of their drinking habits? Do you have to be a drunk to a good writer?
—Just Starting Out

Dear Starting Out:
Yes, as a matter of fact, you do. I’m not saying pounding booze is going to automatically make you a better writer, but it certainly can’t hurt.

I’m also certain your creative writing instructor in high school spent a whole class fretting aloud how much greater those masters of prose and poetry would have been if they’d just laid off that awful booze. Well, let me tell you something—they would have all sucked and you’d never have heard of them. If that logic were true, there would be scads of great teetotaler writers instead of a meager few.

I scan my extensive library and can’t find a single master who wasn’t a certified drunk. F. Scott? Boozehead. Mark Twain? Drunkard. Dylan Thomas? Whiskey addict. Mailer? Sot. Kerouac? Big boozer. Wilde, Swinburne, D.H. Lawrence? Hooch hound! Now, one could argue that too much drink brought low some of the greats from their dizzying heights of genius, but it was the creativity and life-enhancing properties of alcohol that put them in that high tower in the first place. And if you’re going to fall, you might as well dive from such a height that you can enjoy the view on the way down.

Don’t you agree?
A fellow I work with has the good fortune of being able to come into work drunk each day, or at least he could and no one would be the wiser. He suffers from a disability affecting his speech, eyes and walking ability such that he appears to be on a perpetual bender. It doesn't stop him from getting around though and he's quite active, especially when it comes to OSU tailgate parties.
Cincinnati Red's Broadcasting Legend Joe Nuxhall...



...retires after almost sixty years with the Reds organization. He was the youngest player ever to appear in a major league game, pitching at the tender age of 15.


Joe on the left, HOF'r Marty Brennaman on the right
Blogger Quizzes Too?

New book challenges accuracy of online personality tests.
Personality tests are administered to millions of people every year for purposes ranging from career counseling and educational guidance to determining parental fitness in custody battles. But Paul, a former senior editor at Psychology Today, contends that the accuracy of these tests and their diagnostic value have never been convincingly demonstrated; their results are, she says, "often invalid, unreliable, and unfair."
Turner Classic Movies is having a Graham Greene fest
Rebirths

A trinity of resurrection stories last night - the song at the end of the film Titanic is properly autumnal, a bit melancholic and sentimental. So I watched the last five minutes on tape again and it dawned on me - duh! - that the last scene was resurrectional, the elderly lady's body and the ship's body reborn in a new youth. The first time I saw it it seemed a device to mimic a play where the cast comes back out for applause.

Then finished the powerful "Song of Bernadette", with Bernadette's death-bed scene illuminated by the sudden awareness of what was to come. And finally there was the Glorious Mysteries with the vision of Mary's reward.
Positively Edenic

I take our dog a walk
on a splendid splinter of a day
The sun glew like glue
on the back nine of the neighbor’s trees.

Sat in the front porch swing
cigar'd and book'd and ale'd
assuaging a dearth of fiction
avoiding polsteria*.
_

* -(i.e. politics + hysteria)

October 06, 2004

UK Spectator Column:
Fainthearted Canadian Tories may have signed on to ‘a woman’s right to choose’, but the refusal of American conservatives to accept, as the rest of the West has, that the abortion issue is settled looks sounder every day. Whether or not individual women should have the right to choose, the state has no interest in encouraging them to do so. What Western societies need is more babies.
Five Years Ago...

Having nothing new to say I'll steal a fine idea from E. L. Core, who links to blog entries one year earlier. I didn't see much in my posts a year ago so I'll cannibalize from my journal, written in 1999 about books, college days, and possible eye surgery (I didn't). As always, remember what you paid:
Oh glorious dank, overcast Sunday! I can run to the bookroom unreservedly, without the least guilt-distracting, second-guessing thought. “To the bookroom!” I yell to my unfaithful cat Sam like Batman saying to Robin “To the bat cave!”. I love the dark, somnolent weather that lends a a cozy air to my library. It doesn’t surprise me in the least that no one reads in Los Angeles since inclement weather is the bibliophile’s friend.

I have a framed picture of the 19th century British statesman William Gladstone, fellow book-collecting victim:

"At a London bookshop the proprietor asked Gladstone, ‘which books shall I send?’ To which the statesman swept his arm grandly about the premises and said, ‘Send me those!’ after which he marched out the door. When someone approached the counter a few moments later the proprietor said, ‘that book and every other has been sold to Mr. Gladstone!’ According to one bookseller, buying entire bookstores was something of a regular practice for Gladstone.’

Bibliophiles were more common in olde times. Napoleon had shelves installed in his carriage so that he could read many volumes when traveling. Julius Ceaser once took great pains to protect his books’ safety by swimming with a ‘book in one hand, sword in the other’. (It was not known if he was reading at the time). Philip Hamerton said, “Now the only Croesus that I envy is he who is reding a better book than this.”.

“Alas! Where is human nature so weak as in the book-store! What are mere animal throes to and ragings compared with the fantasies of taste, of those yearnings of imagination, of those insatiable appetites of intellect, which bewilder a student in a great bookseller’s temptation hall?” – H. Beecher, 1859
*
I remember the Beacon Hill-ish glow of old-fashioned streetlamps against ancient oaks and beech. Freshman year, Eric and I looked through the college catalog looking at the byzantine list of clubs and hoped in vain for a ‘baseball card collecting club’. By the time we were seniors, changed by sorority parties, frat-hazing, intellectual growth and hazy bookishness, baseball cards became rectangular fragments of cardboard that we tried vainly to inflict meaning upon.
*
Is it ironic that some expect Heaven to the be the unleashing of all our appetites, even though we work for a lifetime on earth trying to leash them?
*
Into the brave new world of a laser eye surgery center, a cheery staff of 20/20-visioned workers greet me. The newness of the office suggested the newness of the surgery; the secretary threw away her glasses only 2 weeks ago. You could still see the indents of glasses against the nose. They were all carried away with the enthusiasm of the newly converted, they exclaimed how great it was to be without glasses and asked why I wanted to be rid of them. Bleary-eye'd patients emerge from laser surgery or from tests, a 20-something black girl and a mid-40’s heavyset man with a wife (wearing glasses) waiting for him.

October 05, 2004

Gentlemen*, Start Your Word Processors

It's national write-a-novel month! And this post is my attempt to inspire you - (especially Ham o' Bone) - to do just that (hat tip to Elena).

          <--- (uh-oh, hokey symbol alert!)

I think mine will be a coming-of-age novel about a middle-class white child whose greatest heroism comes the day he shucked the amniotic fluid for oxygen. Think taking the first breath is no big deal? Maybe, but not given the panache of our protagonist: "Waaaa-waaa-wa-waaaaa" he said, which, roughly translated means: "I don't need no umbilical cord!" accompanied by endzone crib dance and call to grandma on the cell. We'll then follow the infant through a bout with colic...

The mind reels at the novelistic possibilities - just you and those sweet open lanes of Microsoft Word, that great white way! What pleasure to think outside the lines and wander to and fro and let the editing come later! Thoreau re-wrote Walden a dozen times. Recall the sage advice of the hilarious Jeff Miller who said "You can't hug a child with Venus de Milo's arms" --and you can't edit a novel without writing it first! So hie thee to a Word doc and hitch a ride to the stars - or at least Cleveland.

Remember: if you can't write the Great American Novel, then write the Great Southern Novel. If you can't write the Great Southern Novel, then write the Great Midwestern Novel. If you can't write the Great Midwestern Novel, then write the Great Tri-State Novel. If you can't write the Great Tri-State Novel, then write the Great Upper Sandusky Novel. If you can't write the Great Upper Sandusky Novel, then write the Great Southeast Upper Sandusky Novel!!
_

* - and ladies!
_

Update: A reader let me down gently with the news that the Great Upper Sandusky novel has already been written. No one said this was going to be easy.

On the subject of readers, it sounds cliche but I think I can make the case for having the best readers in blogdom. This blog lacks comments, which means readers come here sans ulterior motive. They also endure whiplash from lurching gear changes from silly to serious; deep to self-indulgent. I appreciate it.

"Branding" is all the rage among corporations now and part of branding is consistency. McDonald's wants a hamburger in Des Moine to taste the same as the one made in Bejing. But blogs like this tend to be the "un-brand". I don't see anything wrong with that because blogs - unlike corporations and elite newspapers - don't have to take themselves so seriously. There is freedom in not having to make money here.
Movies Deux

I usually don't watch movies more than once* but I'm finding there's more to be gained from the diminishing returns of an old film than the "stale freshness" of a new one. And I usually catch something previously missed.

I'm in the middle of a second viewing of Song of Bernadette and the Dean of Lourdes asks Bernadette an interesting question: "Why didn't Our Lady say 'I am the fruit of the Immaculate Conception'? You can't be a verb. You can't say 'I am birth', for example." I immediately thought of Jesus saying, "I am the Resurrection" and how the Father raised Jesus up - in some sense becoming the Father's action. Mary became the Immaculate Conception by virtue of another action of the Father. Verbs are verbs, but when the Divine is acting through someone in such totality the verb becomes the noun because "God is Love" and "God is Truth".

*

In The Passion of the Christ there's the scene where Jesus is building a table. There is symbolism: he is building something new, a new kind of table, like a new kind of Covenant. Jesus says to his mother that it is for a "very rich man", i.e. God the Father.
_

* - the exception being The Three Amigos, which I've watched at least three or four times.
Presence without End
Praise
by Laurie Lamon

I heard the dogs before
I opened the door late, after work—
first Maude who was dancing
in praise of my arrival for all she knew
it was: presence without end,
the end of waiting, the end
of boredom—
        and then Li Po,
who, in the middle of his life,
learning to make his feelings known
as one who has carried breath
and heart close to the earth seven
times seven years, in praise
of silence and loneliness, climbed
howling, howling from his bed.
Lovely Writing in the Spectator   ...link here:
Only people with elderly bladders will understand the horror of it: four hours with a conductor reluctant to stop. I had armed myself with Coca-Cola, against car sickness (it is used in hospitals for nausea), but he whipped it away when I wasn’t looking. Four hours. Then Milan, and two hours to Mantua and I woke in that city which surely must be one of the most beautiful in the world, a fairytale inside its towers and moat. I forgot the long night and the bullying conductor and that I had travelled through some of the most beautiful landscape in Europe in the dark. Wandering through streets which the princes of the Renaissance had known, where there is not one ugly building, suddenly we heard a drum and pipe and dancers, and there around a corner appeared plump Bacchus wreathed in ivy, smiling in his chariot, but I think a bit embarrassed, surrounded by stilt dancers in their carnival masks and escorted by an elephant whose back emitted assorted nymphs and satyrs. Lovely Italy, so generous with scenes like these.

When we Brits visit Rome, surely we think of Caesars good and bad, and gladiators, and writers and poets and Lesbia’s sparrow, particularly after the recent television series, but the people living in Rome, do they share it with the legions and the emperors? I asked my minder, but she said no, they were thinking about the rent and what to eat. It was only when she had returned from a year in Japan and saw her city with new eyes that she realised she lived in a pretty remarkable place.
Ch-Ch-Ch Changes (sing like David Bowie)

October falls; the weather snap-changes and the light erodes earlier in the evening and I move the chair to strain-cup the last bit o’ friendly sun. The spectre of Halloween is on the horizon, as is a new urgency in the Church in the form of the feast days of Pio and angels and Francis and Jerome & Teresa. Things are happening.

The forest sits ever open, always ready for business. The trees in their abundance and fecundity are less tuned to seasonal change and still wear their greenest finest. They don’t know they’ll be sticks and trunks. The scent of a thousand forest smells pervades until it becomes physically part of you.
   Spanning the Globe to Bring You the Constant Variety of Posts

Just wondering, because I am a conservative and I also pray. Does that make me a kneel-con? - Jeff Miller

I'm with Bush on substance, but criminy, was he inarticulate the other night....Is Tony Blair available for Round Two? - Mark of Irish Elk

Bush is the opium of the town. (Or to say it with more clarity and less impact: to repudiate Bush - to insult, to make fun of, is a form of escapism in the Argentine masses). Or they replace Bush with Capitalism, if they want. In some cases, the Church... And you see by where I notice that, giving a nut return, the original phrase ("the religion is the opium of the town") can get to be truer and present of which believed. And the opium is clear... - the escapism, the alienation can come as much by the love as by hatred (is enough with the affection is intense and imaginary: as they said in other times, "disordered affection"). - Argentinian blogger Hernan Gonzalez, through the semi-clarity of Babelfish

The problem with factionalism [within the Church today] is not principally that my faction is right and your faction is wrong (although that is generally true), but that our factions are divided against each other. It's not the position of one or another group, but the relationship among all the groups. A lot of people will think this is a distinction without a difference. But the difference is this, that if the problem is your position, I can place all the responsibility for resolving the problem upon you. If the problem is our relationship, though, then I have a clear stake in, and responsibility for, resolving it. As Bls. Giovanni Buralli, OFM, and Humbert of Romans, OP, recognized, no one can effectively preach mutual charity who does not live it. - Tom of Disputations. Mea maximum culpa.

I think about the time when I was suffering because my mother had died. And I was in true grief and torment over all that could have been--in fact still am not completely resigned to this ten-year long reality. And yet, al the time I was at peace because God was present. - Steven of Flos Carmeli

I am especially fascinated by [John Donne's] question, "Is she selfe truth, and errs?" In other words, could the Bride of Christ make mistakes when it comes to the truth? I'm sure Donne was wise enough to know that when individual Catholics sin, they only justify the Church's existence. What he must have meant was the Magisterium erring when it came to doctrine...It is a very anguished poem, sounding very much like a prayer that has gone unanswered for some time. I can imagine many Christians tossing the same questions up to God. Which church is the right church already? The deeper one's relationship with God becomes, the more one desires to worship God as He wishes to be worshipped, and not as one finds convenient or appropriate to worship Him. Donne was really sincere about doing just that; so it must have been agonising for him to be in the dark like that. Another thing I find striking...is that Donne just took for granted that the idea of a one, true Church is part and parcel of Christianity. He didn't see a church as just a community of people sharing their experiences and expressing their love for God together. That would be a clique or club, not a church. He wasn't looking to join a group of like-minded individuals; he was seeking to be a part of no less than the Bride of Christ. I wonder how many contemporary Christians see their relationship with God in that way. -Enbrethiliel of Sancta Sanctis

A point I'm making with increasing frequency and emphasis when I speak on DVC is what we might call the anti-Semitism implicit in Brown's portrait of Jesus. To read Brown, and get your info about Jesus from him (which a shocking number of people are doing these days), one would not know that Jesus was Jewish, but for that whole bloodline garbage. One would not know anything about the Jewish roots of Christian ritual, from baptism to the Eucharist - it is all, according to Brown and his ilk about stealing from mystery cults. This, of course, is very gnostic of Brown, which fits. Evil god creating the prison of matter, the pointlessness of suffering (which is why such things are ignored in gnostic writings, on which Brown partially depends). - Amy Welborn

I watched the interview on Larry King last night with Terri's parents, and the flashbacks to his interview with Michael (Angel-of-Death) Schiavo. All in all, it was heartbreaking to watch their anguish, and be forced to admit that we now live in a world, and a country, which is no longer governed by even the most rudimentary of normal human affections, but by a rule of law that finds them irrelevant, even, in a way, repugnant. That parents would not be allowed to care for their daughter when no one else wants to, that in fact her death is a thing vastly to be preferred to her living, is a state of affairs that I think at one time would have horrified most Americans. But it doesn't anymore. - Bill Luse of Apologia

We live in a celebrity culture, a culture that has informed the thinking of many of us who will never even close to being celebrities at all. Success is defined, not just by the traditional temptations of wealth, power and material plenty, but also by being known. We're doubtful than anything we attempt is worth doing unless it brings us some sort of reknown that we can enjoy here and know, praise that we can modestly wave off, newspaper clipping that we can scrapbook away, reviews that we can preserve. It's all rot, as Therese lets us know. I am frequently set back on my heels by the bare fact that when Therese died, hardly anyone knew that she had existed at all. A young woman, wracked with pain and (important to note) doubts, dies in a French convent. End of story. Not quite. - Amy of Open Book

One of the most helpful insights I've ever gotten into the nature of divine truth comes from one the 20th century's most interesting theologians, Henri de Lubac. It has to do with the sense in which all of the great theological questions could be phrased as "or" questions -- and how these questions inevitably falsify the issue. For example: Is Jesus human, or is he divine? Is Jesus both God and man, or is he one person? Is God all-powerful, or is he all-good, or is evil unreal? And so on. And of course everyone knows that historically Christian orthodoxy has always said "Yes" to BOTH sides of all these questions, while all of the great heresies involve pitting the two sides against one another and affirming one while rejecting the other. The essence of catholic orthodoxy is in this "both / and," this repudiation of the heretical "either / or" alternative. Catholic orthodoxy always involves fidelity to the whole, the ability to maintain both this truth over here and that truth over there, and not to allow any element of the truth to be pitted against any other element. Catholic orthodoxy insists that the truth is always larger, more comprehensive, more complete, more catholic than any heretical alternative; heresy always essentially involves denial of one aspect of truth -- not adding some novelty to the sum total of Christian truth. There is a tendency, therefore, for Christian truth to have a paradoxical appearance to finite, mortal creatures. And this is not the case because God has a fondness for sending us doctrine in neat ordered pairs of alternatives, but because divine truth is too large for us to apprehend in its totality, or understand how it all fits together, and so the most we can do is to affirm both this aspect of it and that aspect, and to distinguish the sense in which (say) God is One (i.e., in substance) from the sense in which he is Three (i.e., in number of persons), so that we see that there is no formal logical contradiction -- though no one pretends thereby to have made the mystery comprehensible. - Jimmy Akin

I was a co-founder of the Pax Center in Erie, PA in 1972, which more or less morphed into Pax Christi USA in 1975... A few years later I was the founder of Prolifers for Survival, a short-lived (1979-85)group which was trying to do the "Consistent Life Ethic" thing: we waged relentless courtship between the peace and prolife movements, got arrested at abortion sites and arms bazaars, that sort of thing. Saw the whole thing get cannibalized by Cuomoistas (the Personally-Opposed-Butts), which makes me feel great grief and anger. As perverse things go, one of the perversest is to see the "Seamless Garment" turned into a patchwork quilt and the babies get shredded and dumped like so much landfill. - Julianne Wiley on Mark Shea's blog

Molly Ivins exchanges onstage banter with Planned Parenthood's Sanger Singers before joining them in a rousing chorus of "Does Your Mifepristone Lose Its Flavor on the Bedpost Overnight." - caption by Dawn Eden of "The Dawn Patrol"

Being Grateful...for the many good people in my life. My husband (sometimes) and children. - Pansy of Two Sleepy Mommies. Just sometimes?

October 04, 2004

A French emigrant discusses war and abortion among U.S. Catholics.
_

Tom is sort of my equivalent of sackcloth & ashes, a form of penance, because he constantly makes me feel convicted (as my Protestant brothers and sisters are wont to say). It would be nice to have St. Catherine vet my posts because not everything allowable is desirable, and I've never figured out what this blog is. Is it a place where I can commiserate with fellow Catholic conservatives? Or is it a place where I should woo rather than alienate the 2.5 moderate and progressive visitors I get each week?

I'm going to try to turn over a new leaf and cut down the political blogging this week. (Baby steps, as in What About Bob?.) Call it "erroring on the side of silence" which is a real trial for those of Irish heritage.
From a Paul Theroux Novel:
Soon after I arrived in Hawaii, I had reflected on how the sunlight here was so dazzling, it gave us the conceit that we were virtuous and pure and better than other people. Everywhere else on earth was worse - people got sick and cold on the mainland and had to wear socks, Africa was poor, China was overcrowded, Europe was senile, and the rest of the world was dark. We took personal credit for our sunshine and expected gratitude from strangers for sharing it with them. This Hawaiian heresy was dangerous, for it made us complacent about the damage we did to these crumbly little islands. We were so smug about our sunshine, we were blind to everything else, as if we had been staring at the sun too long.

O Happy Day, when I can sing of God’s praise even while accepting my own porousness as a broken vessel. O happy to ask for humility and receive it at the Divine Liturgy! Judging others is a sign of the heresy of wanting to work my way to Heaven since judgment is too often “at least I am not like him”; judgments made through a beam.

The Holy Blood and the holy songs of the Byzantine Liturgy seep into my blood and I rest in the combination and in the knowledge of the power of God. Earthly experience has taught self-reliance while religious experience has taught helplessness. I live in the tension between the two. Over and over the medicine applied; the ointment of songs and Blood on hard tissue. Softness reigns, my soul involuntarily unclenches.

And so the burden lifts when I know that my weak example as a Catholic among agnostics is less important than what God will do in their lives and mine. Five loaves. Two fish. The miraculous is to be expected.
WaPo Article

The Washington Post has noticed St. Blogland, complete with the obligatory caveat for unsuspecting readers (link via Jeff Miller of Curt Jester)--

Because the overwhelming majority of people who have the time and equipment necessary to blog are white middle-aged, well-educated and affluent, there is a conservative tinge to the blogosphere, said Lynn Schofied, a new-media scholar at the University of Colorado whose research focuses on the internet.

My stepson leaned to the left until he started taking Econ classes (he graduated with a degree in that field). Now he might be too ardently conservative on fiscal matters, if'n you ask me, but I think it shows journalists need a broader education. Fortunately blogs have allowed half-educated people like myself to help them out, a free service some wags might call "the blind leading the blind".

Perhaps conservatism is less about age, race and wealth and more about what you think produces the most wealth for the most people, i.e. your views of economics.

October 03, 2004

Technology & Faith

60 Minutes had a fascinating segment tonight about the generation of kids aged 13-20, slated to be the next mass influential generation after the baby boomers. An expert said those just entering the workforce expect a lot of feedback, constant credit for what they do and a quick series of promotions - i.e. "they are in for a major adjustment."

"I talked to the CEO of a major corporation recently and I said, 'What characterizes your youngest employees nowadays?'" says Levine. "And he said, 'There's one major thing.' He said, 'They can't think long-range. Everything has to be immediate, like a video game. And they have a lot of trouble sort of doing things in a stepwise fashion, delaying gratification. Really reflecting as they go along.' I think that's new."

The expert blamed this on our technologies like the internet, video games, and even the instant gratification of cell phones (one teen said "it's so annoying when they don't pick up right away.")

All of this reinforced the wisdom of the pastor of my church who said the problem in our culture is an unwillingness to suffer for future reward. Everything is about maximizing pleasure now. Religious faith would seem, by definition, the opposite of instant gratification. Do the new technologies undermine religion? Do the Amish have a point? The story of Abraham is primarily one long story of delayed gratification. God made promises and fulfilled them only after an achingly long time. Abraham was to be the father of countless generations though twenty-five years went by during which Sarah went through menopause.

Of course the irony is that twenty-five years is instant gratification in the light of eternity. But how does one remind oneself of that when one is accustomed to a life without waiting? Oh yeah, prayer and fasting. Ouch.

October 02, 2004

Losing Perspective

Our local diocesan newspaper ran a column last week which suggested some sort of moral equivalency between our use of the atomic bomb and the crimes of Hitler and Stalin. There are degrees of evil. The obvious example is if I kill my brother, that is worse than slapping him. I see a distinction between Truman trying to avoid continuation of the war by use of the bomb and the wholescale killing of tens of millions by Stalin during the '30s. All I wanted from the author was a bone thrown in that direction.

She says she is no longer patriotic after learning that we were just as bad as they were. My point is that we weren't as bad, and if patriotism is tied to perfection then there is no one who can or should be patriotic.

She put "the horrors of Communist Russia" in quotes - why? Is there anything remotely untrue about that phrase? Has she read Anne Applebaum's "Gulag: A History"? I sent a letter to the editor.

Graham Greene was one who enjoyed the cache of anti-Americanism:
Graham Greene had known Philby since wartime days when he too had worked in intelligence, and he wrote the introduction to My Silent War, justifying and praising the man and the book, in what now reads like a period curiosity of an extreme kind. Whether out of mischief or conceit, or some literary impulse (with the very remote possibility that he was once more reporting to MI6), Greene had long been cultivating the pose of an independent spirit by preferring everything pro-Soviet to anything pro-American, turning himself into one of the more reliable fellow-travellers of his generation...For Philby in his insecurity, here was absolution from a famous writer, in the hope that disloyalty really was a virtue. The motives of his behavior seem lost in some part of himself which he could not reach, never mind analyze. A few more years were to pass, and the convictions and activities of all these people became academic, adding up to nothing, a facet of the century’s cruel practical joke. Malcolm Muggeridge after all has the last laugh.
Least Likely Bumper Stickers

"My other car is on blocks"

"My child makes average marks at Taylor High School, but he's taking Honor Level courses so the competition is tougher"

"My second cousin, twice-removed once played minor league ball for the Scranton Braves"

"My sister is a Green Beret"

"My Golden Retriever is neither golden nor retrieves"

"Bush or Kerry? They're both so good!"

October 01, 2004

Artful Dodger

Bob Dylan said art requires both observation and imagination and if one is missing, it’s impossible. Which neatly explains why I can’t write but for vacations. There is no observing going on elsewhere. Suburban tundra ought be flanked by police officers saying, “there’s nothing to see here laddie, move along!”. There is a high in creating art, but art’s a fickle lover. Imagination begs out, pleading the laundry, and observation dies on the vine singing “Give My Regards to Broadway” in a fake accent.

Truly it is hard to see anything, but surely that's self-inflicted. I could read more and see films instead of blogging or watching Chris Matthews or George Will. Blogging and television are marquee exhibits in the Museum of Colossal Wastes of Time. I have but one vote to give my country yet I spend untoward number of hours informing myself. At some point I ought not care about how much discretionary spending went up. I’ll be glad when The Election is over.

But oh to sing like Lileks, and about politics no less! He sings like the song thrush, aka Turdus philomelos ('you could look it up' as Yogi would say), despite dealing in subjects as unpromising as my high school prom dates. He'll write like there’s no tomorrow and he’ll impregnate it with obscure references to things like “bang-sticks” which I prefer not to know about so I can properly appreciate. I ache for a Dying Swan reference of my own but you can’t fake it. Nijinsky schmijinsky. Lileks is the Annie Dillard of politics, too alive by half, with prose as thick as motor oil. You can’t write that densely without having a head for everything you’ve read and saw, and if you misspent your youth playing dodge ball and collecting rocks (without knowing their names – you just wanted one of every color) then you’re out o’ luck. You can’t write that sort of murderous prose without having burnt sienna in your crayolas.

And what of politics after all? Well, how can one not appreciate the self-criticism of the West? It's necessary though it has the scent of Yeats about it: the terrorists full of passionate intensity with the West lacking conviction.
The Secret of the Little Flower by Henri Ghéon
At twenty-two Teresa had attained the perfection of a great saint and, however surprising it may be, nobody but her sisters had an inkling of it...She had obtained what she had aimed at: the nuns ignored her. Nor, although he was her sole confidant, did God know her either-or, rather, he pretended not to. That was what made Teresa throw herself at him with such audacity. The more he hid himself the more she wanted him; the more he ignored her the more she made an offering of herself.

On the other hand, her forsakenness must not be exaggerated, for there are certain admissions made privately to Mother Agnes, apparently while Teresa was still a novice. "Several times in the garden in summer," she says, "after the beginning of the 'great silence' in the evening, I have been in so complete a state of recollection, my heart so at one with God, and making acts of love so warmly and yet without any effort, that it seems to me these graces were what our mother St. Teresa calls 'flights of the spirit.' . . . I felt as it were a veil hung between me and earthly reality, and our Lady's cloak covered me completely. I had ceased to belong to this world, and I did all I had to do . . . as if my body were only lent to me for the purpose." Teresa would live in deep peace for several days under the influence of such exceptional graces; then she would "wake up."...

"[God] is misunderstood and repudiated everywhere." Human hearts turn to other created beings "seeking their happiness in an affection so weak that it cannot endure a moment." "O God, shall your rejected love remain within your own heart?" Would he not joyfully consume souls in its fire and cease to have infinite tenderness confined within his own breast? If he is glad at the satisfying of his justice which regards only this world, "how much more of his love of mercy which reaches to the heavens!" "Jesus," she exclaimed, "may I be that happy victim!"
In the Dark

Many saints seem to arrive at an advanced stage of holiness that culminates in the dark night of soul. In an email discussion with Steven Riddle prompted by the question "where are the gifts of the Holy Spirit - such as peacefulness - during Dark Night of Soul"? Steven said that it is a paradox but that there was a serenity behind St. Therese's suffering, even as she doubted the existence of God. Perhaps it was an imitation of Christ's suffering, which seemed not particularly peaceful ("My God, My God, why hast thou forsaken me?).

It's not that most of us are in any immediate danger of the Dark Night, but as it comes from Him it must be good. Jesus is the Divine Physician, not the Divine Pacifier, and what is not healed now will have to be sooner or later. But I'm thinking it's probably not a good idea to anticipate or look ahead.

An answer to these thoughts came from Fr. Ambrose today: "What does it mean to be children of God? It is to expect to have all your needs taken care of. It is to expect everything. It is to know that everything is grace."
Ain't It The Truth
Worship and service make up [the angel's] blessedness; and such is our blessedness in proportion as we approach them. But all exercises of mind which lead us to reflect upon and ascertain our state; to know what worship is, and why we worship; what service is, and why we serve; what our feelings imply, and what our words mean, tend to divert our minds from the one thing needful, unless we are practiced and expert in using them. All proofs of religion, evidences, proofs of particular doctrines, Scripture proofs, and the like - these certainly furnish scope for the exercise of great and admirable powers of mind, and it would be fanatical to disparage or disown them; but it requires a mind rooted and grounded in love not to be dissipated by them. As for truly religious minds, they, when so engaged, instead of merely disputing, are sure to turn inquiry into meditation, exhortation into worship, and argument into teaching. - Ven. John Henry Newman
So the great debate is past

Give Kerry his due. He exploited the natural advantage a non-doer has over a doer. A doer will always be on the defensive because his doings will rightfully be criticised, especially in hindsight. A non-doer, a sitter in the Senate, has the advantage, like bloggers, of sniping from the sidelines. That is the nature of incumbent & challenger though voting is doing also. Bush should've held Kerry more to account given that the Senator mixed up not just his words on the $87 billion but his voting.

Update: Lileks cracks me up:
 "You want to really anger a UN official? Tow his car. Short of that you can get away with anything."