January 31, 2006

Politics & Religion

Here's a master of the obvious statement: writing about political issues is a massive draw in the blogosphere. The heaviest hitters are political scribblers like Instapundit and Little Green Footballs, to name but two. One of the most popular among St. Blog's is the inimitable Kathy Shaidle, whose blog is a mix of religion and right-leaning politics. She writes (they say it ain't braggin' if you're tellin' the truth):
[It] just keeps going and going, btw. As this blog moves into its 6th year, January 2006 turned out to be its busiest month ever, with over 41,000 uniques. That's a 20% increase over the previous month, and more than 100% more traffic than this time last year.
I used to think that it wasn't a good idea to mix politics on a religious blog (though of course I do it -- see my blog title for the explanation). My thinking was that it's not good for a political party, or economic opinions, to become associated in some minds with Christianity since Christianity is apolitical and it will just urinate off all those whose politics are different. No need to turn off a percentage of your audience, right? But sometimes I wonder if it can't be a sort of crude apologetics tool. Curt Jester is a stalwart conservative and a papist while my brother-in-law is a stalwart conservative and a non-believer. I sent my bro-in-law a link to one of Curt Jester's funnier political posts since it cain't hurt to have him (my brother-in-law) nosing around the good Jester's site, can it? If Mr. Jester's site was all religion I wouldn't be able to do that. Who knows if there are conservatives who happen across the ever witty Kathy Shaidle's site and begin to form a more positive view of Catholicism? With her kind of numbers you never know...
         

Here Cathoholics had waited nine months for the new sheriff in town to put up the wanted poster, or maybe the "No Guns Allowed" signs, or something. Anything. What we got was an insightful, clear, and even moving exposition on Divine love. All to the good, of course; we heartily endorse Divine love. But now what?... What if he wrote Deus Caritas Est, not to pad the footnotes of a barrage of Notices from the CDF he's been preparing for two decades, but to teach the Church about Divine Love? - Tom of Disputations

I thought that iMonk essay was extra good, too. When I understood that I was part of a physical, visible and invisible church, then I also became physical and visible, if that makes sense. I finally realized that my littlest sin affects the entire Body of Christ, once I realized that the Body of Christ was real, now, in real time. Three guesses what I'm praying for regarding iMonk.... -Therese Z on Julie of Happy Catholic's blog

Isn't it odd, I thought the other day. Ironic, let's say. For the past three decades or so, "God is Love" has been shorthand for "Eviscerated catechesis," to the point at which many years ago when I first showed up to teach at Santa Fe in Lakeland, the students joked about my predecessor - a coach who moved on to try his hand at a career in sports agency - saying that for four years, the answer to every question on every test came down to "God is love." Well, the reality is - it actually does. Maybe Benedict will give us the gift of reclaiming the full meaning of what that phrase really means. - Amy Welborn

"Nobody in this story, and no outfit or corporation, thank God, is based upon an actual person or outfit in the real world but I can tell you this, as my journey through the pharmaceutical jungle progressed, I came to realize that, by comparison with the reality, my story was as tame as a holiday postcard." - John Le Carre.... I would add the observation that this tortured sentence contradicts itself on its own terms. First, it disclaims ("thank God") that the film's story has any connection to known reality and then ends by saying that had the author written what the author had actually observed it would have horrified us even more than this fictional account. - Ham o' Bone

Your comment about "God is love" being shorthand catechesis reminded me of something really profound said by the great Anglo-Catholic poet W.H. Auden. In the context of saying that the sacrament and the rituals were for him the truly life-changing aspects of the mass, he pointed out that most of the sermons he ever heard boiled down to sort of warmed over "you must love your neighbor" which, he noted, he already knew. - Commenter responding to Amy's post

Writing the book was by far the hardest project I've ever done. I'm so glad it's over. I used some Dawn Patrol material to get some of the chapters started, but 90% of it is new. Even the Dawn Patrol bits are heavily rewritten. I thought I was pretty sharp at the time I wrote those old entries—now I see that the difference between blog-quality writing and book-quality writing is vast. - Dawn Eden

Christ the King is designated as a charismatic parish, because it was founded for members of a community of participants in the charismatic renewal. As such, there are a number of special features to its liturgy, which is otherwise perhaps the most strictly observant of the Novus Ordo rubrics in the diocese...We also have ten men preparing for the priesthood: four graduate seminarians and two college seminarians for our own diocese, two for a neighboring diocese, and two for religious orders...We really are a community. Not because we have a modernistic sign advertising “The Catholic Community of Christ the King” out front—we are just Christ the King Catholic Church—or because of sentimental prating about “our parish family,” but because we really are one. People from the parish have living, supportive relationships with other members of the parish on the basis of our common Catholic faith...It is possible that a new bishop, advised by a typical batch of curial liberals, will destroy the particular character of Christ the King, I am praying that we can survive this crisis. If anyone is reading this, please pray for us. - Henry of "A Plumbline in the Wind"

[Catholic philosopher] Russ [Hittinger] insists that that our rather mediocre situation is not explained solely by the “politically correct mien” of the academy.. “But here is a hint—the decline of religious life: secular priesthood and those under evangelical vows. Whoever has the intellect, imagination, and patience to think this one through will reach the vicinity of the problem. And it might prove a lot more interesting, cutting in different ways (in cause and effect) than what you first thought.” - Joseph Bottum quoting Russ Hittinger's speculations on why Catholic influence in academia has waned

Serving the poor is a good thing, but so far as I know, no Catholic was ever martyred for feeding the hungry. - Jeff of "Hallowed Ground"

In explaining his views on love and sex in the encyclical, the Pope quotes from biblical writings, encyclicals written by his predecessors and the works of philosophers such as the 17th century French thinker René Descartes...Italian newspapers reported the encyclical as saying that even in "more just societies" Christians should do charitable works, not just for the benefit of others but for their own good. - newspaper report on the papal encyclical
You've Heard Of...

...authentic looking 'distressed' ballcaps, that make you look like you wore it a lot:



Can we be far from 'distressed' bibles that make it look as though they've been read more than they have?

,

January 30, 2006

More Pics...

  • The sights in Mexico.
  • Two of our dining companions at Jamaica. You might be surprised, but that's not his real hair.
  • Enchantment.
  • Sigh. All that's missing is Gilligan and the Professor & the rest of the gang.
    ___

    And...from a Presbyterian church bulletin in the Grand Cayman Islands:
    There will be no Happy Seniors in January.
  • A 1955 Prayer Book

    ...I have is particularly politically incorrect today. I love these glimpses into how dramatically and quickly a culture can change. It contains a line in a prayer for today's saint, St. Martina, that is inconceivable in today's environment where it's an affront to use the word "mankind" instead of "humankind":
    Oh God, Who, among other wonders of Thy might, dost grant even to the weaker sex the victory of martyrdom; mercifully grant that we, who celebrate the heavenly birthday of Blessed Martina, They Virgin and Martyr, may progress, through her example, ever closer unto Thee.
    Post-Trip Thoughts

    I always enjoy posting trip logs in part because I can bury any embarrassing commentary or disclosures in the mass of the thing. It always surprises me that people actually read them since I figure the length will daunt most people, per design. I figure only the hardy soul(s) who appreciates what I write will take the time to read it. It's funny and ironic when a trip log, like the one just posted, gets a larger audience than expected. But of course I'm obviously quite flattered and glad it did. And what a compliment.

    Vacation time affords a time of reflection, a fertile period for assembling a life narrative. That sounded awfully '70s didn't it? Stand by for a quote from Eric Berne or use of the word journal as a verb. My temperament has always been conservative, since it's long been obvious that we live in a fallen world (as anyone growing up in the Lord of the Flies environment of the typical grade/high school ought know). Life is fraught with unintended consequences (see Bush's Iraq policy) and I’ve long been wary of heaping too much on the frame of mind and soul, not wishing to foolishly test their maximum limit. I’ve never been fond of tempting God, of taking on risky adventures without some sort of mandate.

    It’s folly to take Zmirak's “The Bad Catholic’s Guide to the Good Life” too seriously but it is funny, and anything humorous usually has the ring of truth. And the point made serially within is that you don’t want to keep too high a profile with God lest you be chosen. And you know who gets chosen right? Prophets, apostles, the Jews, Jesus, etc… And you know what happens when you get chosen don’t you? You suffer outrageously. But it occurred to me that I don’t know how you keep a “low profile” with a God with whom you talk to and receive in the Eucharist. It’s like keeping a low profile with your wife, with whom you talk with and have intercourse with. Nearly impossible. The best you can be is be honest.
    Answering...

    ...this meme, I would've asked the five questions but Curt Jester stole (well, you can't steal if you answer it first) at least two of my questions. So...

    Who are the first five people you'd like to see in Heaven?

    Jesus & Mary obviously. Also:
    St. Thomas Aquinas
    St. Perpetua
    My grandmother Ruth
    My great-grandfather James, whose demise in 1913 or after is a mystery
    My aunt Mary

    January 29, 2006

    Sea Trip Log

    The sea, once it casts its spell, holds on in its net of wonder forever.
        --Jacques Yves Cousteau
    Day 1

    “Buddy of mine told me that. Cracked me up.”

    So said the burly fellow from the East Coast who sat near us at the shipboard restaurant, shortly after telling his wife or girl friend the ancient joke that “it’s noon somewhere” when musing about whether it was too early to start drinking alcohol. And to think I’d always thought guys on the East Coast were ahead of those of us in the middle of the country. Not that I’m above using that old cornball, but I’m just saying.

    After a scant five hours sleep (bring out the violins and let the pity party commence!) we open the door to the cabin, called “stateroom” (because we all know language matters), and collapse on the bed. I wake up an hour or two later, groggy with a slight sore throat. I’d been fighting off colds for three weeks now, with more near misses than George Washington’s army. The pressure was on - I couldn’t get sick on a cruise. So despite eating only three hours ago I knew the cure: more food. My father seems to think that food is the answer to minor illness, which always struck me as quackery, but it really works. Two “free” pieces of cheesecake later (and a ham sandwich) and I feel better than I’d felt in hours. I realize I can either get sick on this cruise or gain weight and I’m betting on the latter. The sheer availability of food is astonishing, all the more so by comparison with its unavailability at our house. Food without cooking (or waiting and paying for it at the point of sale) feels wrong - it’s as though God wills food not be so easily gotten, for the brow must sweat for it.

    I hit the ship’s library early. The sight of the sea from the harbor gave me a hankering for Coleridge's Ancient Mariner or maybe Herman Melville. They don’t have them (what kind of sea library is this? I see no Patrick O'Brian either). I walk out with Murakami’s “After the Quake” and a Bill Bryson travelogue through Europe. My ancestors arrived one hundred and fifty-nine years ago on coffin ships but this is anything but. The unreality of the interior is leavened by the scene from the balcony, the water rushing by. Nature as an antidote for mediocrity. You can’t look at the ocean and be uninspired, its very inexhaustibility is a foretaste of heaven. The bigness of this landscape requires something bigger than Bill Bryson, something more epical, like Belloc’s “Hills and the Sea”.

    Sunday Mass today and the priest didn’t pull any punches. A retired military chaplain who derives his salary from Uncle Sam, he’s a ‘free agent’ who can pretty much say what he wants without any repercussions from peeved parishioners or bishops. And he does. It’s really odd how every time my wife, an evangelical, goes to Mass with me, the priest makes some sort of negative reference to Protestantism (although he admitted that term is almost meaningless since it runs the gamut). It’s odd because on 98% of all Sundays there’s nothing said that any evangelical could possibly take offense. (Later I would overhear my wife refer the ‘Catholic Church’ in a haughty, William F. Buckley voice, during a conversation with her sister.)

    He pointed out his fellow ex-military retiree, an evangelical “Holy Roller” he calls him. And they get along fine. The holy roller accompanies him for meals and sits in the audience at all the daily Masses. Most novel was the ‘Q & A’ period this priest has after homilies. Today he was asked how he reconciled free will with Jonah’s refusal (initially) to serve God. Fr. Jose said that the OT is not the New and that we are in a new dispensation. In the New, God tells us to turn the other cheek while in the Old it was “an eye for an eye”. In the New Testament, God holds his hand out and we can either accept it or not. Free will. Fr. Jose also mentioned that with prayer we have a constant hotline to God – like the Kremlin had to the White House. “No one can do what I do. No one can confect the body of Christ from the elements of bread and wine. Oh there might be a priest or so somewhere amid the 4,000 onboard but none has the jurisdiction to change the bread to the body of the same Jesus who walked on the earth 2000 years ago.” Pointing outside the room, “oh and I don’t care if no one outside this room knows it.”

    At the pool, the downside of capitalism is seen: no dollar is left on the table. That is, every square inch of deck space has a lounge chair, each recliner so close to the other that it feels like a large communal bed where everyone is wearing less clothing than the typical pair of pajamas.

    The sea is remarkably uncapturable in photograph or words. In that way it’s like St. Peter’s in Rome. Bill Bryson says much the same in his trip to Rome of St. Peter’s. He said he’ll never think of any structure in the same way after seeing that one. If pictures of the ocean or St. Peter’s are ineffably puny compared to their actuality, I can’t even begin to imagine how pale my pictures of God are compared to God Himself.

    Day 2

    My favorite moments on a cruise are inevitably the breakfasts, which are, for all practical purposes, breakfasts in bed. You circle what you want on the room service menu the night before and magically it appears within a given half hour specified the next morn. We mark the menu like naughty children, seemingly extravagant in our requests and yet we eat it all. We’re responsible even in our irresponsibility. To waste food because it’s “free” (or pre-paid) is still a foreign concept, though one that is beginning to seem less foreign.

    I pick out a book to read. An early choice is Randy Wayne White’s “Captiva”, and lo and behold just one week after I quote Zippy and say there is no such thing as coincidence I read this sentence from White’s novel: ‘There is no such thing as a coincidence.” Now there’s a coincidence that negates my previous statement.

    Today is Labadee day, a Royal Caribbean beach on the edge of Haiti. Ten minutes after I say the groaner, “it’s hotter than Haiti”, a bastardization of “it’s hotter than Hades”, we overhear a stranger say the same thing. Cliches are us! The couple we’re here with joins us lounging on a sunny part of the beach. The boat looms large in the mid-distance and has about it a benevolent presence, feeding and sheltering us as it does. But feed and shelter it really does to the Haitians in the area.

    Like West Virginia she’s almost heaven, though almost hell to her inhabitants, eighty percent of whom are unemployed. This is a state you so want to succeed – predominantly Catholic and the first black republic. We go on a historic walking tour and the guide was grim about her future. He also mentioned the comeback of voodoo and gives examples of how it kills the local economy by making people afraid to take the jobs of those who have been fired. Back in the ‘50s and ‘60s, only the old people practiced voodoo. It was dying out. Now many of the young do, perhaps 20%, perhaps even the tour guide himself.

    He was 7 or 8 years old when Royal Caribbean came and leased this beach area from Haiti and nothing was the same after for the little Labadee village. Before they lived in mean mud huts with thatch roofs and no telephone or electricity. Now they have houses made of modern materials and phones and electricity, all compliments of Royal Caribbean (there is no electricity bill in the village, he says, RC takes care of that.) Labadee village is off limits to tourists due to security concerns but it is where the workers come, the tour guides, the musicians, the sellers of cheap folk art. He’s glad there is no way to get to the beach from Labadee village except by boat, there being no paved roads, because it “keeps the bad guys out”. The less accessible the better - “let them swim here,” he says, and we laugh. He speaks excellent English and is obviously grateful for the money and education he’s received thanks to RC. (The money is $12 a day plus tips, which goes extremely far in the Haitian economy, such as it is.)

    His gratitude is touching and I wonder how long it will last. At 28, he’s seen the before and after though his children won’t. He’s a “convert” in a sense and his children will be “cradles” and consider RC a given, an entitlement even though Labadee is among the riches of all Haitian villages. He reminds me I ought be more thankful for blessings both spiritual and material.

    He said Haiti functioned well when it ate what it produced, which is basically the story of Africa. Subsidence farming seems to work better than having just a toe in the industrial world. They don’t want to eat potatoes or fish, they want french fries and trade for it. Perhaps french fries are to Haitians what alcohol was to the Indians. They have to go eight to nine miles off shore to catch fish and then take it far to market in order to buy…french fries. The human tragedy in a nutshell.

    At the Haitian flea market I didn’t see much I wanted. They are tireless pushers of merchandise and I tell one honestly that what I really need is a watch, pointing to my wrist. It had been lost or stolen on yesterday while laying out on the pool deck. Losing stuff is never a question of “if” but “when” which is why I buy $20 watches and $8 sunglasses. I, for one, am grateful for a society that produces disposable things since I manage to lose them anyway. Quality, schmality, that just makes the losing the harder. So the salesman gets the attention of one of his buddies and next thing he’s taking the watch off his wrist. Where, I ask, in America will somebody sell you if not the shirt off his back then the watch off his wrist? Nowhere. And it’s kind of sad it happens here, although I expect he can get one much cheaper than the money I gave him so he made off fine.

    This avuncular host went off his rocker when he began to talk about voodoo. He explained how there are many zombies walking around, and that one of them he hired to tend his garden. Zombies are those raised from the dead by a voodoo priest. He also explained that he doesn’t eat steak because only some people can tell whether it’s the meat of a bovine or meat of a bovine who was changed into a cow but is really a man. Something like that.

    Time waits for no man and the whistle doth blow. The ocean mist gathers about her shore-ish hem as we make way, following the relentless Western ache for adhering to schedules. Haiti leaves us in the gloaming, and leaves us all a little poorer. But I recall the fervor of the tour guide, who stared at me unnervingly during his long soliloquy on voodoo. Very unnervingly. He even pointed to me saying, “You’re a businessman and you hire me and then fire me and then you replace me with someone, I might go to a voodoo priest to have my replacement killed.”
    __

    At dinner tonight Tom told us that he hated cheese due to a traumatic childhood accident. He’d gotten Dominos, or maybe Donatos, and the pizza was very hot and the cheese stuck to the roof of his mouth. Ever since then he has sworn off pizza in particular and cheese in general which seems a shocking lifetime loss. Post traumatic cheese disorder is nothing to laugh about.

    Day 3

    The sea forms a bright clear line at the horizon, neat as geometry, as ordered as a chess set. The clouds hang like poignancies, phantasms of unreachable nostalgia, the kind that induces a sort of physical thirst. Wind whipping on the balcony, I wonder if this is how it felt to be on watch on one of Buckley’s sailing trips across the Atlantic.

    The cruise director and I are at cross purposes. I want to be bored, to have time to stop and recharge the batteries, to gaze out at the full sea like a lover, to paraphrase the Little River Band. Our cruise director wants to distract us, make time fly and make it less of a “nature vacation” to the extent one can make a trip with 4,000 others a nature vacation.

    The worst time on this cruise might’ve been the short episode at the Casino Royale, where the crowds were so thick you couldn’t move and where the master of ceremonies was supposed to draw winning tickets but was taking his time about it, first having us look under stools for some free gaming coupons. Getting over-stuffed people of a certain age to squat on a rocking boat looking for gaming coupons is a tough sell, and he complained about how so few were found. It’s funny that gambling is so popular and yet I relish it so little. Would I were a Baptist I could start off 33% righteous.

    The shows on board are generally cotton candy entertainment. Jugglers, magicians, flashy dancers. But tonight this man seems a cut above. He produces a thrill-chill moment when he sings “Mr. Bojangles”. He set it up by explaining how Sammy Davis Jr. changed his life. Said he saw one performance and quit his moderately successful rock band, the one that took him all over Europe. For the first time in his life he was hungry, with no source of income except the joy of impersonating Sammy’s music. Probably not the most paying gig in the world. Eventually he opened for Bill Cosby and before the very first performance he had a special guest. Sammy Davis Jr. himself.

    My reading list has expanded. New entrants include Arroyo’s “Mother Angelica”, baseball manager Jack McKeon’s autobiography, and Martin Dugard’s “The Last Voyage of Columbus”. McKeon is a lover of cigars, a former manager of my beloved Cincinnati Reds and a daily Mass goer devoted to St. Therese of Lisieux. How can I not read his autobiography?

    Stories of saints, or near saints like Mother A., are oft perfumed with the scent of predestination such that one is tempted to say, “oh they were saints because they’re supposed to be saints” as if that charism is limited to them and others like them. And yet God must go to extreme measures to show that we are nothing without Him – such as in the Old Testament where the Israelites’ army was about to go into battle and Yahweh had only a tenth of them go in. An impossible situation made possible only by God. Renewal in the Church has to come about similarly, through a great saint whose actions can only be ascribed to God. God is a ‘credit mon’ in our household parlance, and rightfully so, being not just the source of love but Love itself.

    We live in an odd grace/free will atmosphere, that impossible admixture, where sinners prove free will exists and saints prove that grace exists. It’s sort of disturbing that there’s more sinners than saints around though it’s not as binary as I make it out to be since it’s a journey and we’re in a contiuum. Sometimes I think the tragic-comedy is the saint and the sinner meeting and each immediately thinks of the other: ‘your life is so hard’. Sanctity is hard but then so is sinfulness, at least in the long run.

    Saints are good for despair and for presumption. For despair because they offer hope. The apostles, seemingly picked at random, were average sinners who became saints. For presumption, they offer unnerving acts. Like St. Augustine, who sometimes didn’t take the Eucharist due to a sense of personal unworthiness, and who, on his death bed, recited the penitential psalms with tears. Saints are *really* sorry for their sins, which is the opposite of presumption.

    Day 4 (if you’re scoring at home)

    It’s 11 am and somewhere Jerry (not his real name) is drinking. He is a happy drinker and he certainly knows what he’s here for – drinking and gambling. He’s not getting distracted by musical shows or ice dancing or rock climbing. He closed down the casino – 2:30 am – which is the time of night I haven’t seen since I was 26, other than waking up in the middle of the night due to insomnia. You gotta say he’s getting his money’s worth, except you have to pay for the drinks and the slots. He’s subsidizing the rest of us, keeping the cruise price down. And I’ll drink to that.

    Financially speaking, there are levels here, starting with the crew, who come from second and third world nations and who are able to send home serious money to support their families (serious money at least in terms of their respective economies; they work extremely hard, but grumbled only about next week, when the ship would be chartered by group of all homosexual men). One level up are those who don’t drink and gamble, and who thus support the crew members. Another level up are those who do drink and gamble who support those who don’t.

    Went to “Stingray City” today, which isn’t a real city but a spot off the Grand Caymans. (It seems you can tell the wealth of a Caribbean island by its degree of flatness, and the Grand Caymans are very flat and very rich.) Forty years ago fishermen used to come to this shallow sand bar to clean their fish. Stingrays came in great numbers to feed off the entrails. And a tradition was born that continues to this very day in the form of tourists feeding them.

    We were on a tour with a large extended family from Philadelphia. The 40-something man with graying hair at the temples is sitting next to his mom and has a tattoo just above his ankle that says “Mom”. Sweet. The men in the group are very talkative and funny, which seems a common trait among large Philadelphia-area families.

    We were passed to increasingly rough-looking characters. Levon was a baby-faced man with a wispy mustache and Spanish features. Then we went to an old bus driver and a woman who, by way of emphasizing a need for tips, told us she is struggling to feed her baby. We were then taken to a fishing boat where two lean and weather-beaten dudes promised us a “three hour tour, a three hour tour”. Sorry, couldn’t resist. Miguel and Manuel were both missing a distracting number of teeth. They did a good job, their dark skin and wiry frames perfectly suited to the task.

    We get out into the three and four-foot high water and the guide holds a stingray for us to kiss as a photo op. He also gets a picture of us with a stingray behind us, horizontal and belly side up, looking in size and shape like the the cartoon character the Tasmanian devil.

    Day 5

    God is good. I’d marked 8:30-9:00am as breakfast, per my wife’s preference, though it meant I’d not be able to receive Communion at Mass due to the hour fast. Yet, inexplicably, breakfast came not only in the 8-8:30 half-hour but early in that half hour. I looked at my watch after that last sip of coffee: 8:28. Later, I looked at my watch as the priest began to distribute Communion to the fifteen souls: 9:28. Wonderful!!

    Fr. Jose is a curious mix of “conservative” and “liberal” tendencies and thus pleasingly unpredictable. He emphasizes that God is just, that he can’t imagine serving a God who is not just, and that no repented sin goes unforgiven but that all sin must be “paid for”. “You have to pay,” he repeats in his Cuban accent. The story of David illustrates this, he says, in that David’s child with Bathsheeba was stillborn and that his dream of building the Temple would not be fulfilled, but would be by his heir. He goes on to say that criminals ought to have to work each day instead of enjoying three squares and a television and such. Fr. Jose also shows a softer side. He says that mortal sin is extremely difficult to achieve.You have to basically say to God, “to hell with you!”. He said in the early church only three sins were considered what we would call ‘mortal’: killing someone, committing adultery and blaspheming (apostasy). He said it was the Middle Ages when monks got carried away with imagining that falling asleep during the Divine Office was a mortal sin and this lead to scrupulosity. He said back in the ‘40s the Dominican brothers taught him that you could steal $4.99 from your parents and it not be mortal, but $5 was. So he got to thinking you could just keep stealing $4.99 indefinitely. It would seem the Church pre-Vatican II was not as spiritually healthy as many children of the ‘70s might think.

    The 35-minute ferry ride today to the Mexican mainland from Cozumel was almost like a glimpse into Purgatory. The waves were tremendous and the seasickness fierce. Within ten minutes people were wailing and within twenty perhaps a third were vomiting. A man handed out plastic bags to everyone saying “just in case”. The crew was ready for this even if we weren’t.

    My wife closed her eyes and tried to block out the noises and sights of the sick, the power of suggestion being what it is. In the beginning it all had seemed almost funny, like a ride at an amusement part. Soon I had to loosen my belt and unbutton my pants and I began to perspire, the precursor to your basic vomitation. I managed to make it without throwing up, though I could’ve kissed the terra firma of Playa del Carmen, Mexico.

    We went to the ruins at Tuluum, the site of the Mayan temple and city. Afterwards, a child of nine or ten tried to sell an embroidered handkerchief for ten pesos. That’s a dollar, which I knew, but I had some sort of brain fade and I thought that was ten cents. I kept offering her a quarter, and to make matters worse I offered to take multiple kerchiefs since I thought I’d offended her pride by overpaying. For dumb American tourists I’d wished she’d have said “One dollar”.

    Day 6

    The ship is replete with little undiscovered nooks and crannies. This was our second cruise and I didn’t realize there was a little cigar haven, with lots of leather chairs and a calming, rich décor, a refuge from the frenzy of the promenade. It’s full of dark polished marble and Aztec imagery, which reminds of how ironic it is to be going to Mass at the Ixtapa Theatre, with its statues of Indian gods. It’s like how David made pagan Jerusalem the Holy Land and how Christians made pagan Rome the seat of Peter.

    Earlier I’d relaxed in the hot tub – the early bird gets the worm and the hottub – listening to a Chieftains tune and watching the ocean beyond, like a vast blue moving sidewalk. It reminds me of spring break Ft. Lauderdale circa 1986, an age of constant drinking and no detectable inner life. One moment resounds with absurd clarity; standing by a pool that overlooked the ocean, the bright blue of the pool segueing to the deeper blue beyond. I had, not surprisingly, a beer in hand and Marty was nearby with the camera, ready to record for posterity my holding it aloft, like the Statue of Liberty carrying her torch, and the subsequent fall into the warm bosom of the still waters. To this day the sight of a pool next to the ocean awakens that memory. Sin was in the spring break air and I was pulled in equal and opposite directions like a wishbone. I wanted, naturally, to have it both ways.

    I read a bit of McKeon’s book. His idea of exercise isn’t bad. He walks 2-3 miles smoking a cigar while saying the rosary before games. He matter of factly says that he prays and goes to church because it makes him feel good, like he can handle whatever challenges the day brings. His simple spirituality is heavy on petitions and gratitude and how “when God closes a door, he opens a window”.

    I have a theory there’s more creativity and eccentricity in small towns and religious folks than in cities and the more secular. They say that saints are very dissimilar because they are more uniquely themselves, not putting on airs. McKeon seems eccentric in the right ways. Daily Mass is an eccentricity I suppose but more impressive is how nonchalant he is and was with respect to his career. In a profession with little security, he’s not concerned because he knows God will take care of him. He also did other eccentric things, and offers a host of them, like the time he sent a batter to the plate without a bat since the team wasn’t taking enough pitches. Or the time as a minor leaguer when he ran out ground out and continued to the foul pole in right field, climbing half way up. Perhaps eccentricity thrives in small towns and religious people because both possess more feelings of security.

    Day 7

    This is the last day, a drinkin’ day, a day to reflect and visit more parts of the ship. The only time I feel rich is when I’m buying drinks onboard. $4.85 for a Guinness? $6 for a rum runner? I must be rich to afford these prices.

    I started out outside Two Poets Pub, listening to a violin player accompanied by two guitars. They were playing Hungarian waltzes and then “Moon River”, both having the hint of mourn appropriate to the last day of a cruise. A couple of elderly eastern European women happened by and are thrilled to hear the music. I can tell they are probably Hungarian because of their reaction to the music but also by their eyes and shape of their noses. One of them is thrilled to find a young couple dancing to the music of the Olde Sod, and rushes over to instruct but is taken aback when the girl suggests that she show her husband how to dance to this. It’s rare to see a babushka taken aback, and I smile. She says, “No, No, but you dance closer… Closer!” and proceeds with more of the impromptu lesson.

    By 4pm the 25mph winds on the top deck, and the increasingly fragile sun combine to create a climate unfit for swim suits. The guy in front of me actually has a jacket on. A guy with a tall chef’s hat is carving some sort of ice sculpture on the pool deck below us and the crowd is appreciative. Cruises seem like a nice fit for those with obscure, non-utilitarian skills like ice sculpting.

    I’m reading both Dugar’s “The Last Voyage of Columbus” and Bryson’s trip through Europe. While Dugar is sympathetic to Columbus, he takes cheap shots at the church like “luckily for Columbus, the Catholic Church wasn’t burning adulterers.” Bryson also made especial effort to say that the Church has done a tremendous amount of harm. But apparently no good. Dugard uses as his sources Durant and Tuchman, no friends of Christianity.

    Now the sun has dipped under a bank of clouds and I’m freezing but because it’s a Caribbean cruise I really can’t be cold, can I? Never trust your feelings except when they’re right. The wind topples a near full rum runner; earlier I’d lost my FDNY cap to a wind gust while jogging around the outdoor track.

    The end of a cruise is a fine time for multiple listenings of the Irish ballad “Kevin Barry”. It’s five pm – last drink o’ the trip and the ocean looks like a plowed field full of young crops made of sparkle. Or like white steeds galloping to the horizon. The sun rays in the distance emanating from the clouds would look corny in a painting. My head rests against the railing, soaking up the dying rays of this dying Gaul. The waves are lit as if from below, whitecaps tumulous as pregnant bellies constantly regenerating. The main glow is in the distance and I wonder if locals here in the Caribbean or residents of Southern California, where summer is perpetual, suffer a spiritual disadvantage since those in wintry climes understand the sun is to be shared, that her absence means she is giving succor to someone else. Do they lose the advantage of having to adapt to something larger than themselves or will they find it elsewhere?

    It’s been nice to spend consecutive mornings with my wife. How rare! The weekends are the only possibilities and on Saturdays she goes to Weight Watchers and on Sundays to our respective churches. The end of the trip would not be uneventful. We were rushed to leave the cabin since the estimated time that Royal Caribbean would call our group was 8-9am but ended up being around 7:45. I looked in the safe at least twice, saw nothing, but it was at eye level and there’s a ledge and you have to feel inside it. Big mistake. I never use safes in hotels, perhaps trusting too much of the hotel cleaners, but my wife thought it best to have it in the safe. So we went through customs and all the rigamarole and we’re about to board the bus to the airport when I notice my wedding band is M.I.A. We found a busy Royal Caribbean rep and she radioed someone ship board and then she disappears. Ten, fifteen minutes later she came back with the ring and a smile!

    Beautiful isle of the sea, Smile on the brow of the waters.
    --George Cooper



    Iguana at Tuluum

    January 20, 2006

    Posts Will...

    ...be scarce as I'll be traveling this week. Hold down the blogging fort for me.

    Update:  FYI, I added a few posts after this one today but pre-dated them so that this will show at the top.
    Whoda Thunk It?

    A year or so ago the blogging pheonomenon was such that I thought there had to be someone at X corporation, where X = my company, who was a blogger. There was a lot then in the news about bloggers getting fired for saying negative things about their employer and so I was sufficiently curious if anyone was taking their career in their hands at my own workplace. And I found someone and began reading her blog and website. Turns out she not only works for X, but works, or did until a week ago, one floor above me.
    Yer Out!



    Over at the parody blog, Ray Nagin just wants to get thrown out of the national conversation.
    Manna from Ignatius

    My favorite writer of biography - a Joseph Pearce interview!
    Interesting Comments

    Hockey great Wayne Gretzky once said something like "you regret 100% of the shots you don't take". Well I end up regretting about 80% of the comments I make. I said something reactionary on Amy's blog, hardly worth the paper it's not printed on, while Henry Dieterich, probably the most underrated commenter around (I suppose he doesn't blog often enough to warrant most underrated blogger) answers commenter Whitcomb, who said in part, "If it's OK to read and study the Vagina Monologues on campus, why is it wrong for the college's theater department to put on a performance of the play?" Henry writes:
    I have some sympathy for Whitcomb's point, but I think it involves a misunderstanding on several levels. First of all, the comparison between the VM and a Nazi rally is apt in that the common element is advocacy...The VDay site demonstrates that the VM is similarly directed toward advocacy, although how identifying women with their sexual organs and deriding self-control could reduce violence toward women baffles me. The other works Whitcomb cites also have their point of view, even The Music Man (whose message--that a profligate fraud can improve the life of a town and win the love of a decent and intelligent young woman--may be the most immoral of all), but it is presented in a context whose purpose is to entertain and to provoke, rather than to direct, thought.

    Secondly, given that a performance of the work is an act of advocacy, it is within the competence of any institution to determine what kinds of advocacy it will permit under its sponsorship. In this present age, it is right that Catholic students should be aware of the views of those who despise Catholic teaching; but it is only responsible exercise of their office that the administrators of Catholic colleges should not permit advocacy of teachings opposed to those of the Catholic Church, whether they are expressed by the VM, the Ku Klux Klan, Bob Jones, or Osama bin Laden.

    In deciding what kind of advocacy to restrict, and in drawing the line between performance and advocacy, those who have responsibility must exercise judgement. That is why they have been put in these positions, and why institutions are run by people, not machines. Different ones may draw the line in different places. I think Fr. Shanley has drawn it in the right place.
    Morose Temperaments Think Alike

    What does it say about me that I'm temperamentally attracted to "doom and gloomish" bloggers (though with the exception of the perennially sunny Steven Riddle)? I like the 'realist' temperament because I share it, but that doesn't mean it's good for me anymore than eating a lot of chocolate is good for me. Many of my favorite bloggers won't ever be confused with the folks in "Up With People" (ouch, that reference shows my age).

    Bloggers like me should counteract that by reading the late Gerard, Steven, and Moneybags. And by reading the encouraging Word Among Us, which has been a great gift for which I am thankful.
    Fictional Friday

    James Michener Meets David Foster Wallace

    It was mid-August at the University of Mississippi when young gun David Foster Wallace, progenitor of the novel “Infinite Jest”, met seasoned hand James Michener, progenitor of single-named historical tomes of infinite length like “Alaska” and “Texas” and “Madgascar”.

    Differences in temperament were reflected in their clothing. Michener wore plaid pants with a shirt that was neither short-sleeved nor long-sleeved but something in between. Wallace wore a red kerchief and a black t-shirt with the words “What’s After Post-Modern?”.

    Michener was old school, doggedly piling up respectable Anglo-Saxon words on his Underwood and winning readers the way Chrissie Evert won tennis matches: with a relentless baseline game. Wallace was new school, showing up on campus with stacks of newly coined words that he served like flashy revolvers under the southern sun.

    Their advance men met and shook hands, followed by Wallace and Michener themselves. James extended his hand and David shook it, saying that he read him when he was just a boy.

    Then they stood twenty paces apart as called for by the script of any good Western. Wallace drew first blood: “Macarism!” he yelled before Michener could say "malapropism".

    Michener answered, “that’s easy. Noun. ‘Pleasure in another’s joy.’”

    Michener then said, “Tathagatagarbha!”

    Wallace paused and said, “A gimme! The eternal and absolute essence of all reality according to Buddhism.”

    “Tachyphylaxis,” said Wallace.

    “Rapid development of immunity to the effects of a drug, especially to those of a poison through previous ingestion of small amount of same,” answered Michener.

    “Dactylioglyph?”

    “Engraver of gems.”

    And so it went, each taking their shot, until the sun faded and the bystanders who stood next to facades of old buildings left and only the stars in the heavens witnessed the rest of the exchange.

    "Bull," slurred Wallace.

    "a male bovine," said a very tired Michener.

    Fatigued to the point of drunken stumbling, they hung onto each other's shoulders for balance when Wallace said, "how about we co-write something? Like "Infinite Russia?"

    "Sounds good to me..."


    Update:  Just received a friendly email from a reader who corrected my spelling of "tathagatagarbha" which I'd erroneously gotten from another source as "thagatagarbha". I think I just moved up about eighty places on the list of blogs having the smartest readers. Not that my head is swelling or anything. (Although my wife is getting me an ice pack.)
    A Thin Read

    I'm underimpressed by Frank Gannon's "Midlife Irish", at least with respect of to his view of Catholicism. It seems "Catholic Lite", no more rich and capable of transforming us than a lite beer is able to satisfy the beer afficiando's palate.

    This version appears stripped of the miraculous, indeed of grace itself. Gannon pooh-poohs the idea that St. Patrick performed anything other than "magic", all the stuff of legend, but will he extend that to the apostles in the Book of Acts where a dead man was raised, or to the miracle stories of Christ himself?

    It was Archbishop Sheen who said the systematic weakening of Christianity has occurred in two distinct phases:
  • Denial (at the time of the Reformation) of the miraculous in the current Church, such as with respect to the Real Presence in the Eucharist

  • Denial (with the 19th century German scholars) that the miraculous happened in the early church or in the gospels

  • First undermine the visible Church and then the visible Scriptures. You're left with a pale version of Christ who was merely an itinerant preacher, not the Son of God Himself.

    January 19, 2006

    Belloc Online

    From Hills And The Sea (ht: Mr. Riddle):
    I am far from books; I am up in the Pyrenees...Lord! How dependent is mortal man upon books of reference! An editor or a minister of the Crown with books of reference at his elbow will seem more learned than Erasmus himself in the wilds. But let any man who reads this (and I am certain five out of six have books of reference by them as they read), I say, let any man who reads this ask himself whether he would rather be where he is, in London, on this August day (for it is August), or where I am, which is up in Los Altos, the very high Pyrenees, far from every sort of derivative and secondary thing and close to all things primary?
       

    They loved each other like brothers, yet they quarrelled like Socialists. They loved each other because they had in common the bond of mankind; they quarrelled because they differed upon nearly all other things. The one was of the Faith, the other most certainly was not. The one sang loudly, the other sweetly. The one was stronger, the other more cunning. The one rode horses with a long stirrup, the other with a short. The one was indifferent to danger, the other forced himself at it. The one could write verse, the other was quite incapable thereof. The one could read and quote Theocritus, the other read and quoted himself alone. The high gods had given to one judgment, to the other valour; but to both that measure of misfortune which is their Gift to those whom they cherish.
    __

    For these ancient places do not change, they permit themselves to stand apart and to repose and—by paying that price—almost alone of all things in England they preserve some historic continuity, and satisfy the memories in one's blood.
    __

    Of the complexity of the sea, and of how it is manifold, and of how it mixes up with a man, and may broaden or perfect him, it would be very tempting to write; but if one once began on this, one would be immeshed and drowned in the metaphysic, which never yet did good to man nor beast. For no one can eat or drink the metaphysic, or take any sustenance out of it, and it has no movement or colour, and it does not give one joy or sorrow; one cannot paint it or hear it, and it is too thin to swim about in. Leaving, then, all these general things, though they haunt me and tempt me, at least I can deal little by little and picture by picture with that sea which is perpetually in my mind, and let those who will draw what philosophies they choose.
    John Derbyshire on Jimmy Carter

    They say if you can't say anything nice about someone then you shouldn't say anything. So Derbyshire has plenty of nice things until...
    As a foreign-born citizen, I have always felt a tad ashamed of my loathing for Jimmy Carter. He is, after all, a very American figure. No other nation but ours could have produced this particular combination of dogged industriousness, earnest religiosity, public spirit, and shameless self-promotion. In externals, there is even something admirable about the man. He served his country, in the military and in public life, very conscientiously. He practiced business with modest success...His rise to the highest levels of office was driven at least in part by an earnest desire to do right by his fellow citizens. He claims adherence to a studious and generous style of Christian belief. His private life has been spotless, his administration down at the low end of the corruption scale. Very American. Yet it often happens that the purest breed of dog, with all the “points” perfectly developed, is sickly and ill-tempered in personality. So with Carter.
    Conservatism Is...?

    George Nash on Jeffrey's Hart's The Making of the American Conservative Mind
    As a corrective to ideological hubris, Hart’s morality tale is instructive. But prudential conservatism teaches more than one lesson. “The politics of reality,” unchecked, can be a snare. Realism itself can become a confining ideology. Adjustment to “actuality” carries its own peril in a too-easy assumption that the future must always resemble the present.

    Hart extols Ronald Reagan as a prudent conservative, and Reagan certainly was not reckless. But he was also an optimistic, proactive, and quintessentially idealistic conservative, determined to alter the reality of the Cold War. And he did.

    American conservatism at its Reaganite best is a combination of impulses — of realism and idealism, of prudence and hope, of worldly sobriety and faith-based aspiration.
    Here in Ordinary Time

    Living in Ordinary time.
    Living in Ordinary time.
    Gonna set my watch back to it
    ’cause you know that I’ve been through it.
    Living in Ordinary time.
       - to tune "Livin' on Tulsa Time"

    Take a look at a Lileks post, full of tales of flu and fury and daily activities with lines like "Well, it’s the middle of the day, and nothing’s happened." and yet also "I already miss the ring; that thing woke not just the dead, but dead Irish poets who died drunk..." I like the look of narrative, I like the cut of its jib and the fine ordering of paragraphs with words of varying length and complexity and humor like the line elsewhere seen of driving "to the limit of unticketability". But reading good prose is not completely dissimilar to watching kids fly towards a Slip 'n Slide - you want to play too. Reading as a kind of participatory sport.

    Indeed self-indulgent posts like this are crucial to defeat the creeping professionalism of blogs. Professionalism in the form of it having to say something of Deep Meaning when sometimes, especially in this our deep winter, we'd rather explore squirrel holes. "Go long!" we used to say when it was our turn to QB, "go deep!". Sometimes there's more depth in play.

    I've always taken pleasure and solace in statistics, where statistically something's always going on and where measurements give a faux sense of control. Old Farmer's Almanac has the goods on Old Man Winter, lays it all out for us, full of funny moon symbols and antique bromides. Winter, the Almanac says, consists of three months with temps averaging thirty-some degrees, Dec-Feb, and two months averaging fifty-some degrees, Nov & March. So it's a five month enterprise which means we are exactly half-way through. (I tend to gain weight over the winter due to a viscious cycle of making up for lack of exercise with increased food intake. Long bike rides past mirage-like farms are long past with only the stubs of two mile runs as replacement, carrying scarce desire for extension. But I find food is just as tasty, if not more so, than at any other time of year.)

    Complaining about winter is unworthy of breath or pen or 1s and 0s. In an age of central heating it would dumb-down the word 'challenge' to use it in connection. A "challenge" is being a soldier in Iraq or a mother of six. Still I am cheered by the calendar, not just in a metaphorical sense as in 'this shall pass' but in its physicality, it's sweet-tempered, saint-dusted presence next to my desk. There are green-dotted days (Ordinary Time), red-dotted days (remembering a martyr) and opaque-dotted days that fall into some sort of "All Other" category: Baptism of the Lord, St. John Bosco, etc... Every day a reason to celebrate.

    Cliches can be the most truthful and may even be the best way to say something, but I care too much for unpredictability. "A foolish consistency..." and don't we love to be surprised? I miss Kathy the Cheerful Carmelite and Dylan the poet, both fresh-voiced as summer-ripe blackberries. Now, trapped in prisons, their absence far from precludes the necessity of prayer but only begs it.

    On the scale of the surprising, we might place Alito-saboteur Teddy Kennedy at one end, who hasn't said anything interesting in twenty years. But is that so bad? Some say the Pope is predictable since he's never going to say "promiscuity is good" or "God doesn't always love us". Yes unpredictability is overrated, rare as it is in this time (like all times) where most live as prisoners of the age, parroting our opinions from Oprah, who incidentally and predictably, far from being embarrassed over the Frey situation, simply avers that if a book moves you, it's got to be true. Call it a defining truth down, or as Shakespeare wrote, "truth's a dog must to kennel".
    An Easier Prayer to Pray   (except it's not either-or but and-both)

    I'll never forget when a family member (not my wife) told me that she never prays that God's will be done but that her own might be done. I asked how she could still pray the The Lord's Prayer (i.e. 'thy will be done'). Maybe she just sort of glosses over that clause like the way I did with a phrase in the hymn "Whatsoever You Do" when I was an easily embarrassed kid, the part where it says "when I was naked you gave me your coat". (Sang as "when I was [cough, cough] you gave me your coat.")

    Perhaps she was just more honest than most. It's easier praying that we not be led to trial (that closely conforms to my will at least). But it's a legimate request, imprimatured on the best authority: Jesus himself requested we pray thus in the Our Father and in Luke 22:40:
    Then going out he went, as was his custom, to the Mount of Olives, and the disciples followed him. When he arrived at the place he said to them, "Pray that you may not undergo the test."
    Early Church Fathers weighed in on this verse, as recorded in the Catena Aurea:
    Bede writes: It is indeed impossible for the soul of man not to be tempted. Therefore he says not, "Pray that ye be not tempted," but, "Pray that ye enter not into temptation," that is, that the temptation do not at last overcome you.
    Theophylact: That is, that they should not be overcome by temptation, for not to be led into temptation is not to be overwhelmed by it. Or He simply bids us pray that our life may be quiet, and we be not cast into trouble of any kind. For it is of the devil and presumptuous, for a man to throw himself into temptation. Therefore James said not, "Cast yourself into temptation," but, "When ye have trials, count it all joy', making a voluntary act out of an involuntary.

    January 18, 2006

    That's Gotta Hurt

    (Title stolen from a line in a Hambonian screen play.)

    Zippy writes...
    One of the biggest tragedies in being over forty is that Guinness, even in small doses, now gives me blinding headaches. Red wine too. "Sulfites" they say, but me I think it is devilry from the sixth circle of Hell, perpetrated on me by my nemesis Asmoday. Can it be coincidence that "sulfite" sounds like the material that paves that particular street of perdition?
    There are no coincidences.
    Re: Hillary's Plantation Comment

    Barrel, meet fish. Fish, meet barrel.
    Narnia & 24

    Camassia enjoyed Narnia, with a few caveats including: "the sacrifice of Aslan is about as subtle as a piano dropped on your head." Funny line. I found the film similarly enjoyable and well worth seeing but I don't recall being as moved as I was by the latest episode of the television show 24. Jack in some ways seems more inspiring and Christ-like than Aslan, even though the show's obviously not intended to be allegorical of anything.

    Unlike Aslan, a Christ figure we can't completely identify with because, well, he's a lion (yes, it's an allegory and not a documentary), Jack Bauer is a flesh and blood human being. In Sunday's show we meet a surly teenage boy who drinks orange juice out of the carton, in direct defiance of his mother's order. In short, a sinner, though more unlikeable in his attitude and demeanor than actual sins. He doesn't trust Jack, doesn't think Jack has his or his mother's best interests in mind. Yet in episode two, while the boy is yet a sinner, Bauer lays down his life and surrenders himself to the bad guys in order to save Derek's life. Though Bauer underwent no passion, nothing close to the experience of Aslan, he did experience helplessness without a "loophole": Bauer is saved only by grace working through another human being, in the form of the completely unexpected arrival of an officious government minder with an eye for detail. Reading Jack's transcripts, he correctly identifies "flank 2" as a sign that Bauer was feeding them bad information under duress. And so CTU was able to get the bad guys. (Okay so it's a stretch...I just wanted to talk about 24 a bit.)
    Giving People What They Want to Hear Since Adam & Eve

    Cults fascinate me, at least the ones that grow big and successful. Perhaps most are diabolic in origin. If a founder of a religious movement was involved in occult practices you'd think that'd be a rather large warning sign ('Danger, Will Robinson!'), and yet many don't care, seeing mysticism as the mark of authenticity.

    That demonic forces helped in the creation of some religions makes sense because the devil can explain heterodoxy better and more pleasingly than most of us can explain orthodoxy. Same as it ever was:
    Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the LORD God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden? And the woman said unto the serpent, We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden: But of the fruit of the tree which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die.

    And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die: For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.

    And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto her husband with her; and he did eat. --Gen 3:1-6
    Quin Hillyer in latest NR
    [Fred] Barnes and Bush both credit that mainstream American culture with more wisdom than the elites possess. That’s why it’s disappointing that both of them seem to think the broader culture doesn’t care much about fiscal responsibility. I believe they are wrong. Barnes dismisses “small-government conservatism” as a “theology” and its goals as a “fantasy.” But John McCain, who for better or worse is no slouch at discerning the zeitgeist, has become ever louder in calling for spending restraint, and the fiscally conservative Republican Study Committee is for good reason becoming increasingly powerful on Capitol Hill. The realization is growing that plenty of red-state Americans still believe that the phrase “small-government conservatism” is a redundancy, and “big-government conservatism” not just an oxymoron but an affront.
    Let's play...

    Why's My Bookbag So Damned Heavy?

    That time o' year again, the time I take a look see inside the old bookbag so as to explain why my shoulder is sore and why I'm always listing to the right. As one suffering from a dearth of fiction and poetry (advanced stage), I'm currently heavy on both but not exclusively so:
  • Bleak House - Charlie Dickens
  • Captiva - Randy Wayne White
  • Europe Central - William T. Vollmann
  • Padre Pio and America - Frank Rega
  • Will in the World - Stephen Greenblatt
  • Orthodoxy - GK Chesterton
  • Blogger Ambitiously Climbs Blogger Ladder

    LITTLE ROCK, AR--Taking Machiavelli's The Prince as his guide, Roger Bilderstrung is attempting to climb the ladder of blogger success.

    "I make sure to praise and link those who have bigger blogs. I also give props to 'the little people', smaller blogs who might one day achieve stardom and bring me with them."

    Roger measures his success by the number of hits and comments he receives.

    "Comments are good, because people like to see themselves in print. Even though they can always set up their own blog, comments allow another forum in which to air their opinions. I don't read them of course, I just keep track of the number and spreadsheet the relationship between comments received and the subject matter."

    Bilderstrung reports reading Ayn Rand's books too.

    "She knew lots of shit, man. Production is key, that's what it's all about. Production and marketing."

    Roger's blog currently averages 55 hits a day, though he says adjusting for lower weekend hit rates it's closer to 58.

    January 17, 2006

    ...And the calliope crashed to the ground

    Perhaps sensing that Social Security and Medicare are going to bankrupt us anyway so there's no point in fiscal restraint, Republicans are pork barrelling - during a war no less - with a vengeance. It looks like a key moment is coming up with the replacement of Tom Delay. My representive, Rep. Deborah Pryce has been reported as sitting on the fence between Blunt and Boehner which frankly surprised me. I don't see how Blunt can even be an option, unless friendships made in Congress override everything.

    Robert Novak writes,
    "Blunt has been complicit in the epidemic of earmarks, where Republican lawmakers far exceeded their Democratic predecessors in the amount of special projects inserted in spending bills without authorization or even a hearing. He also has been vigorous in obtaining earmarks for his Missouri district and uninterested in restricting the practice. He was among the party leaders who last year privately spanked Rep. Mike Pence, R-Ind., the study committee’s chairman, for trying to cut back earmarks."
    Personally, I don't give a fig about travel, dinners on lobbyists, or even much on Abrahamhoff, Schambramhoff. The worst sin seems to be the constant taking money from the treasury without an honest vote. If Blunt makes it, it looks like Republicans will deserve to be in the minority again.
             

    Who gets to meet with the Pope these days[?] Answer: hardly anyone...(And to be honest, I find this totally understandable. The Pope is almost 79 years old and he knows it. Can you imagine being elected Pope when you're 79? Can you even conceive of it? This is a man who knows his gifts, seems to be intent on honestly discerning how God can best use him in the time he has, and knows how to reserve his energy. I think it also shows, to the haters of various types, how this Pope understand the office - as being, essentially, not about him, but about Christ, and that indeed, the business of the Church, while it finds an important unifying anchor in the Papacy, is broadly based. I like it.) - Amy Welborn

    This morning I was talking with a friend and it occurred to me that she had been spending too much time with the "heady" saints--the Dominicans, Benedictines, and Jesuits. Now, to say that these are "heady" Saints is to in no way demean them or to suggest that they are somehow inferior to those I'll call the "hearty" Saints. Rather it is to imply an initial focus and predominant means of access. St. Thomas Aquinas loved God very much, there can be no doubt. He loved God primarily through the work of his mind and the assent of his will to what intellect told it. I mentioned to her that she needed to read the "hearty" Saints. In my mind, the Carmelites and the Franciscans (of the major Orders). [These] writings tend not to be treatises and arguments, a la Summa, but rather distillations of personal experience and encounters with God. - Steven of "Flos Carmeli"

    Jesus said to me, "my daughter you have not offered Me that which is really yours." I probed deeply within myself...unable to see what it was that I had not given to the Lord. I said, "Jesus tell me what it is and I will give it to You at once with a generous heart." Jesus said to me with kindness "Daughter give Me your misery, because it is your exclusive property." At that moment, a ray of light illuminated my soul and I saw the whole abyss of my misery. In the same moment I nestled close to the Sacred Heart of Jesus with so much trust that even if I had the sins of all the damned weighing on my conscience, I would not have doubted God's mercy but, with a heart crushed to dust, I would have thrown myself into the abyss of Your mercy. I believe, O Jesus, that you would not reject me, but would absolve me through the hand of your representative. - St. Faustina of Heaven, where misery=sin

    Prayer purifies us, reading instructs us. Both are good when both are possible. Otherwise, prayer is better than reading. - St. Isidore via Gregg the Obscure

    "I lift up my eyes to the hills./From whence does my help come?" We've seen it, seemingly millions of times, decorating greeting cards that invariably have pictures of Judean hills bathed in the warm glow of sunset. The sentiment seems to be that we can "draw strength" from contemplating the beauty of nature in the mountains etc. etc. That is a lovely sentiment and a perfect reflection of the notions of Romantic poets like Wordsworth or John Denver. Unfortunately, it has less than nothing to do with the actual meaning of Psalm 121. In fact, it is close to the opposite of what the Psalmist intended. For him, the hills were not sources of strength but sites of idolatry. When he lifted up his eyes to the hills he saw "high places" where idols to Baal, Asherah, or Moloch were erected and their rites of worship were carried out. Thus, today's verse, so far from being an expression of squishy sentimentality, is an act of brazen defiance against the culture of death that surrounded the ancient Israelite faithful to the LORD. - Catholic Exchange, via Julie of Happy Catholic

    I have no idea what goes on in hell. Maybe Atta was sent to 'time-out.' - Bill Luse, speculating on terrorist Muhammed Atta's afterlife

    While I'm away, the guests' Douay - Terrence Berres, who quoted the Douay Rheims copiously before leaving

    Read the old Catholic Encyclopedia article on limbo at newadvent.org. It seems clear to me that the concept of Limbo arose as an amelioration of the doctrine that all the unbaptized are damned. It was seen as a *merciful* doctrine. The Church seems to have moved from saying that all are damned unless saved by baptism to saying that all are saved unless damned by actual mortal sin. - commenter on Amy's blog

    My first posting on a blog was November 1, 2002. Since then I've posted on things big and small, wrote many silly things, often made a grammatical fool of myself, angered more than a few readers, encouraged others, and hammered out ideas and opinions that sometimes turned into articles or columns (a big benefit of blogs, IMHO). At times I tired of blogging, but I noticed that it was usually because (pick one) 1) I was too anxious to get dozens of comments and was depressed when I kept seeing "0 Comments", 2) too concerned about the number of visitors to the blog, or 3) someone had carefully and thoroughly demolished one of my perfectly written, cogently argued, and utterly balanced posts. Put another way, pride not only goes before the fall, it often goes public on the blog. Which is not to say I no longer struggle with those problems, but I'm far more mellow (no, really!) about blogging than I once was just three years ago (which, in computer time, is 285 years). - Carl Olson of "Ignatius Insight"

    When you find a good mortification let me know. I've been looking for a harsh mortification that will help bring me mastery over my body and passions but not really hurt. - Rick Lugari

    Saw a bumper sticker that said "Exercising my right to piss off the religious right!" and got really annoyed. I guess her bumper sticker certainly worked. - Pansy of "Peony & Pansy"

    January 16, 2006

    Defending Fiction

    ...from Patry at Simply Wait:
    One of the most disturbing thing about the whole James Frey brouhaha this week is that the book that sold 3.5 million copies was turned down by nearly every major publisher when it was offered as fiction.

    Why? Because readers like you and me wouldn't buy it if it didn't have the imprimatur of TRUTH on it. At least, that's how the editors at 17 publishing houses saw it. I'd like to say they were wrong, that A Million Little Pieces would have sold just as well as a novel, but somehow I doubt it.

    For the same reason that no one would watch a show about a bunch of college kids sitting around in their underwear whining or twenty-five women competing for a limp rose on THE BACHELOR if they thought (knew?) it was scripted, no one would have been willing to hold Frey's hand through 438 pages of vomit and bathos and teary redemption if they didn't believe it really happened.

    As a fiction writer, I'm rather proud that a book with no claims to factual accuracy is held to a higher standard. If it's not "true," then it damn well better be well written--and believable. Kind of ironic, isn't it?
    Novak at First Things:

    One cannot act merely the fair-weather friend, trusting in Providence when things go sunnily, despairing when the skies fill up with ominous clouds.
    The village atheist usually challenges believers in Providence to answer a couple of devastating questions. One of them is: “Well, if two opposing armies pray to the same God, how can Providence be faithful to both if it answers one, but not the other?”

    It was to such a village atheist that Abraham Lincoln directed his famous lines in his Second Inaugural, in which he conceded, “Both read the same Bible, and pray to the same God.; and each invokes his aid against the other.” Lincoln then went on to provide the profound traditional reply: “The prayers of both could not be answered; the prayers of neither have been answered fully. The Almighty has his own purposes.” And then, to show the ageless continuity of orthodoxy he added: “shall we discern therein any departure from those divine attributes which the believers in a Living God always ascribe to Him?”
    A Plu-Perfect '70s Photograph



    Poem:
    As usual, I was thinking about the moments of the past...
    I was even thinking a little about the future, that place
    where people are doing a dance we cannot imagine,
    a dance whose name we can only guess.

    - Billy Collins
    A New Mission

    Catholic Relief Services is introspective after the tragedy in Rwanda and is setting out a new course:

    [I]n April 1994, the genocide began – upwards of a million people murdered over a scant three months. All of our carefully cultivated development programs were destroyed. Peace had not been part of our mission.

    We took a hard look at ourselves. In the end, all the good work we did – the silos and schools we built, the children we fed, the farms we planted – wasn’t enough. After much reflection, CRS resolved to address not just the symptoms of crisis – the burned out houses, food shortages and refugee movements. We also had to attack the systems and structures that underlie oppression and poverty in so much of the developing world.

    We began incorporating a justice-centered focus in all of our programming. And we rediscovered a jewel in our Catholic tradition that has enabled us to do this effectively: Catholic Social Teaching.

    Catholic Social Teaching places the dignity of the human person at the center of all we do. With Catholic Social Teaching as our guide, we adopted a new strategy. We started to re-examine all of our work – our programs, our policies, how we relate to the people we serve, how we relate to the Catholic community in the United States, how we relate to one another as fellow employees of CRS – and evaluate our relationships in terms of whether they help to build a culture of justice, peace and reconciliation.

    For us, relationships count. Providing assistance can foster harmonious relations or reinforce imbalances in societies.We come for the long term. And we work with local people and organizations, soliciting their input and quickly putting them in charge of their own destinies. We also assess the possible negative impact that our aid might bring so we don’t inadvertently reinforce inequalities or distort the local economy. And we try to identify opportunities for building just and peaceful relationships among groups in the places we serve.

    We now know it’s important to consider not only the type of relief that is delivered, but also how it is delivered. CRS wants to avoid making the people we serve become dependent on the aid they receive. Catholic Social Teaching stresses the importance of upholding dignity as well as promoting self-sufficiency. We can’t do the work alone, nor should we.We work and respect local agencies, which are either already our partners or have the potential to become our partners. This is the true meaning of solidarity – not just writing a check, but concrete action on behalf of the suffering.

    January 15, 2006

    How Jack Bauer led me to St. Bridget of Sweden

    Tonight begins season 5 of the television show "24", starring Jack Bauer, a show I never much cared for until I got hooked on it. The premiere is more of a mini-series with two hours tonight and two new hours on Monday, which suggested I'd have to do some housekeeping on Tivo in order to make space. And that meant watching & deleting an old History Channel special on the Black Death.

    HC's The Plague presented the pope of the time, Pope Clement VI, in as awful light as they could possibly manage. They also errored on the side of doing religion absolutely no favors (though Christianity was not fingered as having actually caused the Plague, fleas & rats doing the dirty business, for which we can be grateful). In Pope Clement's case, his efforts to save Jews from unfairly being targeted was apparently much less interesting than the fact that he'd holed up, uncourageously for sure, in order to avoid the Plague. But we're used to this sort of stuff on the History Channel (see The Crusades, where after watching I learned to stop worrying and love Islam).

    But one of the joys of a home library is the ease of available information and the ability to follow your nose wherever it goes. So I read the alternative view of the history of the period via Johan Huizinga's books, Crocker's Triumph, various papal biographies, and Warren Carroll's books on the history of Christendom. And the range of opinion was interesting and provided a far more multi-dimensional view of the Pope and Church during the time of the Plague than I'd encountered in the cartoonish presentation on the History Channel.

    I grew curious at what the saints - credible sources since they are closest to the Most Credible Source - who lived during that time had to say. And in one of the books there was a mention of St. Bridget of Sweden, who moved to plague-ridden Rome in 1350. Having the name, I googled for her feast day and read about her at length in the marvelous 4-volume "Lives of Saints" set I'm blessed to have. (I also consulted the "Bad Catholic's Guide to the Good Life" but she didn't make the cut there.)

    St. Bridget's story strongly recalled St. Catherine's of Sienna's, who was a fellow mystic and contemporary who also wrote outspoken letters to popes in Avignon urging them to return to Rome. St. Bridget also did her darndest to convert King Magnus II of Sweden, which sparked a curiousity about King Magnus's life that my home library was unable to satisfy. Not a great loss.

    According to Butler's "Lives of Saints", the convents St. Bridget started (the Order would later be called the Bridgettines) were austere but had a pleasing loophole:
    All surplus income had every year to be given to the poor, and ostentatious buildings were forbidden; but each religious could have as many books for study as he or she pleased.
    Nice. My kind of religious order.

    January 14, 2006

    The Beer Drinkin' Dog



    Our dog loves beer. I can’t tell if he likes Beck’s or Guinness better though I suspect he’s more of a quantity man than quality. The best chance for him to catch a swill is at the very end or beginning of a bottle since this is when I’m most likely to notice his presence. Yet he sits expectantly throughout, eyes unblinking, not missing a move I make. He’s never unaware of my presence. I sometimes suspect he knows me better than myself, and in his watching me more closely than I do my master his raptness carries with it the hint of reproachment.

    A slow leak of saliva develops from the side his mouth but he is oblivious; he doesn’t wipe it with the cuff of his shirt or his paw-hand as a human might. He holds his ears at half-mast and I marvel he can do so seemingly indefinitely without fatigue. If there are muscles in those ears they are well trained. This is half-mast syndrome is known around our house as the “Flying Nun" look, for obvious reasons.

    January 13, 2006

    History Series

    Video Meliora aims to be a full-service blog but often lacks the gravitas to add to the national conversation. To remedy this I'll begin a series of historical posts, the result of copious research spent in archives previously unexamined due to excessive dust (previous researchers had allergies that are now treatable thanks to modern drugs like Allegra.*)

    Here is the first in the series:


    A Short History of the Irish Race

    Preface

    After not finishing Seumas MacManus's classic "The Story of the Irish Race" it became obvious there was a need for a shorter history of Ireland. MacManus's opus spans over eight hundred pages, which no one with a life could possibly read. Iff possible, Eire's history should be condensed to a single post, and what follows is that 'umble attempt...

    Pre-History

    The Irish race began under the cloud of myth, though this would not be the first cloud Ireland would experience. We think that Cuchulain founded the nation at Maynooth on May 12, 2313 B.C., with the help of the Milesians and the Tuatha De Danann.

    Pre-Industrial Revolution Ireland

    Everything about the Irish can be deduced from the weather on this sainted isle, which consists of winter days of extremely short duration followed by summer days constantly threatened by rain. These facts - augmented by a British nation whose mission was to make Irish life miserable - have produced a national pessimism that has been alleviated only (albeit temporarily) by wars.

    During the winters Ireland suffered from a nationwide seasonal affective disorder so severe that even wars were cancelled due to apathy and a craving for starchy foods. In the Time Before Fluorescent Lights the despair was so great that most people slept while it was dark and woke only when it was light. This was before the Industrial Revolution, after which the British outlawed sleep in order to keep the volume of English exports high.

    Post-Industrial Revolution Ireland

    The Irish coped during this period mostly by bumping serontonin levels, the chemical that makes the brain happy. This was done by upping carbohydrates in the form of alcohol, which was perfected in such a short time that it made the British suspicious. "If they are so good at inventing good beers and whiskeys then why can't they invent other stuff and grow more potatoes?" asked many a British prime minister.

    Ireland also dealt with unfavorable conditions by creating great works of art, primarily in the areas of storytelling and poetry. There are few Irish artists on canvas because every time someone set up their easel to paint a landscape it would begin to rain, and the rain mixed with the oil and canvas and ruined it. And so to compensate they imagined in words what they couldn't produce in paint. But far more importantly the fiddle could be played in wet weather, so Ireland became a land of great music, giving the world tunes such as "Finnegan's Wake" and "Risin' of the Moon".

    In 1916 the bulk of the British yoke was thrown off and the southern counties became the Republic of Ireland. Yet in the late 1970s a bill was passed by the Irish Parliament declaring that Ireland ought to become just like any other Western nation, and by 2000 this was achieved with the help of the European Union and a growing economy.
    * - Full disclosure: I was compensated for this endorsement.


    ________________________


    Exhibit from "Hall of Great Irish Inventions"
    Links, Using 80s Lyrics As Titles

  • On the politics of dancing. (or "Come Dancing" after the Kinks song.)

  • Video killed the radio star - from Kevin Jones on the propaganda aspect of film

  • Just call me angel of the morning - Central Ohioans spread the word!

  • Is There Something I Should Know? - Joseph Epstein on newspapers via Eric Scheske

  • We Built This City - pope praises quick Vatican remodel:
    "I had a small house built for me in Germany once," the pope told the workmen. "I'm convinced that anywhere else this project would have taken a year or perhaps longer."

    From a German pope to his Italian makeover team, it was a high compliment.
  • Books at the Library

    Our local public library has been regularly featuring titles concerning the new pope. Unfortunately most of them are either mixed or negative concerning the Holy Father. (The best they could do was John Allen's '99 biography of Cardinal Ratzinger, which was written when Allen was far more progressive than he seems to be now.)

    My current read is the wonderful "God's Choice" by George Weigel and I can't help but wish it would be featured in the New Non-Fiction section. There's almost no chance it will though and the needlessly provocative title doesn't help. Why Weigel chose a triumphalistic title I don't know unless he's playing to "his base".
    Sure...

    ...it's like shooting fish in a barrel. And sure, it's a form of comedy growing a bit long in the tooth but I still have the itch to reply to Nigerian scammers
    Blog Reader Sues Over Scissors Accident

    Portland, MA-- John Richardson, a reader of the blog Disputations, has filed a lawsuit against the blog owner, John da Fiesole, for suggesting that Richardson clip and save some of the sayings offered on the site. Richardson was injured while attempting to physically cut the computer screen.
    _______________________________________________


       a crude re-enactment - please don't try this
    _______________________________________________

    Attorneys for da Fielsole claim that it is common knowledge you can't cut a computer screen and that 'clip and save' was not meant literally. But Richardson insists that da Fiesole should've known that "somebody would try it" and should pay his medical bills and compensate him for accompanying mental anguish. The case is pending and is scheduled to be presented on NBC's television show, The Blogger's Court.


    the bloody aftermath
    Quick Quote

    "The same thing that brings you in the ministry can bring you out of it. If you're going to stand in front of group of people, you have to believe you know something they don't. And yet if you start thinking you know too much it will destroy you."
    - said by a pastor to young man considering the ministry, on last night's Country Boys
    From National Review

    Charles Murray on Thomas Sowell's A Conflict of Visions:
    The policy arguments between liberals and conservatives, socialists and libertarians, do not arise just from differences in priorities regarding freedom, equality, and security. At root, they draw from different conceptions of the nature of man. The Left holds an unconstrained vision: Given the right political and economic arrangements, human beings can be improved, even perfected. Success is defined by what people have the potential of becoming, not by people as they are. The Right holds a constrained vision: People come to society with innate characteristics that cannot be reshaped and must instead be accommodated. Success in political and economic policy must be defined in light of those innate characteristics.
    ___

    The difference between the Left of the 1960s and that of 2005 is that the politicians of the Left no longer believe in human malleability. The last two decades have refuted every basis for that belief, from the failure of Communism to the accumulating science of innate human nature. And so we end up with a politics of the Left stripped of the idealism that used to dignify even its most wrongheaded positions. The Left used to say that people were driven to crime by poverty and that the real crime was to punish them. Now the Left complains about too many people in prison, but it’s a cost/efficiency issue. The Left used to say that greater equality of income would lead to a happier society for everyone. Now the Left tries to play the envy card, but without the egalitarian idealism. On issue after issue, mainstream politicians of the Left no longer even try to appeal to the prospect of changing human beings for the better. Liberalism has become reactionary, trying to hold on to terrain it occupied in the Thirties and Sixties. Using Sowell’s language, we are watching what happens when Democrats have lost faith in the unconstrained vision of the nature of man and have not found anything to replace it.
    ___

    Then, during the 1990s, we discovered how much the vigor of the constrained vision depended on competition. With the Left intellectually moribund, politicians of the Right began to take the easy way out. It is understandable, because advocating the policies of limited government is psychologically uncomfortable. It requires a politician to say he wants to do things that will cause pain — cut benefits for young women with babies, scrub regulations that putatively protect the environment, or end affirmative action. A decent person can endorse such actions only if he believes that they are essential for the ultimate good, and that means being steeped in the wisdom of the constrained vision of the nature of man. In the aftermath of the Reagan ascendancy, when running and winning as a Republican became so much easier, we got more and more Republicans who wanted to be nice guys.

    January 12, 2006

    The Call

    The voice sounded like vintage
    wine poured from an old oak barrel.

    "Won't you contribute
    to the Grand Old Party?

    My heart hardened.
    "No," I said, fed up
    by a party abdicating
    reason and responsibility
    and having about them only
    the whiff of flaccitude.
    "Best they spend some time
    in the wilderness
    and lose so that the
    lesson might sink in."

    I hung up
    but the thought nagged:
    how can I wish wilderness on others
    and not myself?
    Old Missal/Breviary Page Bleg



    (click to enlarge - flip side here)

    Anybody know what this says? I'm thinking maybe Psalm 21 or 22? I purchased it on the Internet for only $30, so you know it's authentic. :) According to the documentation, "This leaf is from an imperfectly identified Roman Missal printed at Christopher Plantin’s press in Antwerp, Belgium, circa 1570." Who knows how many monk's hands this passed through? Pretty neat.

    Update: The very smart Henry of "Plumbline" comes to the rescue: The long scripture reading, which is continued on the other side, is the story of Jacob deceiving Isaac from Genesis 27: “In those days, Rebekah said to her son Jacob, ‘I heard your father speaking to your brother Esau, and saying to him, ‘Bring me something from your hunting, and make food, that I may eat, and bless you before the Lord before I die’…” The psalm at the end of the first column is from Ps. 18: “The law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul; the testimony of the Lord is faithful, making children wise. The heavens are telling the glory of God, and the firmament announces the work of His hands.” The rest are various liturgical prayers.

    Another emailer writes: The page from the Old Plantin Missal you have on your blog seems to have the Mass for the Saturday after the second Sunday in Lent. The Masses of Lent are amongst the most ancient in the Roman Missal.
    Waste Happens

    I like the Media Research Center. In fact I recall sending a MRC link to Nancy Nall after she claimed that NPR's Nina Totenberg was a centrist. They do good work, and had I made a donation it would be inadvertently funny because then I would have supported both the plaintiff and defendant in this case.

    Actually I would've supported the lawyers for the plaintiff and defendent. But rather than feel angry I could just say that lawyers spend money too and that's what keeps the economy going. There's a line in a Murakami novel about profligate waste being the engine for capitalist societies and I can think of little more profligately wasteful than the lawsuit linked above. But I vaguely recall from a college economics course that the faster money changes hands the better. We certainly wouldn't want the bishops or the MRC hoarding all that filthy lucre.
    Ponderous

    My brother-in-law claims that Christianity is most likely not true because it smacks too much of "wish fulfilment", too good to be true as it were. He says that people can't deal with death so they came up with this strategy.

    We've all heard that before but in this age of instant gratification, when most people think or at least act like they're immortal, how can this hold true? Most of us don't spend a lot of time thinking about next month let alone the end of our life.

    Isn't it more likely that many don't become Christian because they like a sense of control and that the bible teaches that "we are not our own" and have been purchased at a great price? And how can the idea of "wish fulfilment" be true given that we live in an age of moral laxity and God makes moral demands?
    Henry Nails It

    Henry Dieterich comments to another blogger:
    I pray that through all this pain you may come to a greater knowledge of the love of Him Who suffered for you. Because I have in my own life, through similar circumstances, I know that what you need to hear you can only hear from Him--that Voice that communicates the incommunicable--so I won't try to preach to you.
    That is so true. Sometimes I have the attitude that the only one who can correct me is Christ, and sometimes I'll read in Scripture or experience through "Godincidences" exactly what someone else is saying, and it's only then that I am accepting of criticism.
    Hmmm....

    When did Pat Robertson get so kooky? This is sort of scary, because he seemed quite sane during the 80s and early 90s. If it happened to him, it could happen to you or I, no? Now he's to the right of Ariel Sharon and more protective of Israel than Israel itself? (HT: Curt Jester)

    January 11, 2006

    A Rich Book

    ...excerpts from Thomas Woods Jr.'s other book (not the one Paul Cella reviewed) The Church Confronts Modernity --

    How God works with us, quoting Thomas Edward Shields:
    Christ adapted his message, supernatural and sublime, to the capacities of his listeners and issued his revelation in a gradual and systematic way. The more difficult and detailed the teaching, the greater the divine preparation. One of the Church's holiest mysteries, a teaching that has prompted breathtaking art and music as well as endless theological debate and refinement, is the doctrine of the Real Presence of Jesus in the Eucharist...Thus Christ, in imparting a teaching so hard to understand, foreshadowed the spiritual nourishment that the Church would transmit to her flock through the heavenly bread by performing the multiplication of the loaves and fishes - a miraculous deed, to be sure, but one easier for witnesses to grasp and one that would only later be appreciated for its value as a pedagogical device. That such gradualism was characteristic of the divine method of imparting the truths of revelation was readily apparent in the use of Old Testament figures and events as "types" for the unfolding of the New Covenant, and in John the Baptist's preparation among the Jewish people for the message of Christ.
    After acknowledging that catechisms which involve memorization often result in a child memorizing something he doesn't understand and can turn the child off religion, Woods again quotes Shields:
    The catechism, Shields explained, was a relative novelty in Catholic pedagogy, dating back only to the sixteenth century, when it emerged to compete with Luther's catechisms. Even then they were intended to be tools for teachers and theologians, not students. It was only by a twist of fate that the catechism should have come to be viewed not only as the student's principal instrument in religious education but also as the traditional method of imparting such education.
    Shields against the reformers of the 16th & 17th centuries:
    They accused the Church of idolatry because of the way she employed sensory phenomena for the conveying of spiritual truth; they extinguished the lights on her altars; they banished the incense from her sanctuaries; they broke the stained glass of her windows and the images of her saints; they suppressed the sacrament and the ritual. Ignorant of the laws of imitation, they would have neither guardian angels nor patron saints. Not knowing the vital necessity of expression, they held that faith without works was sufficient for salvation. With the Saviour's warning ringing in their ears, "The letter killeth, it is the spirit that giveth life," they accepted the rigid standard of the written word in lieu of the living voice of the teacher.
    _

    [The Church] values feeling chiefly as a means to an end; she employs it to move to action and to form character and she never leaves it without the stamp and the guidance of the intellect.
    On the "Sins" of Appalachia

    Fascinating Camassia post. Lots to ponder, such as the role of free will versus culture, how grace perfects nature, whether poverty's bad simply because one is poor relative to others, etc...
    Links

    I don't get out to Ignatius Insight as much as I'd like because there is just so much there it can be overwhelming. (See Internet Monk's imprimatur.) Here are a couple recent articles, prompted by a commenter on Steven Riddle's blog:

    Balthasar on anxiety (a book I recall the blogger at Ephemeris was reading) and a column about Balthasar on anxiety.

    Best Books of '05
    Pope Benedict Addresses Cella's Issue

    Read Paul Cella's article in Touchstone. His core disagreement with Thomas Woods' latest book is that he is not convinced that the Catholic Church of antiquity, of the middle ages, and of today is the same church.

    Which I thought was a bit specious since, over time, he's not the same person. And you're not the same. And I'm not the same. Every seven years nearly every cell in our body is exchanged. And yet I presume he's unwilling to disavow his identity just because he was completely different in adolescence or as an unborn child. Taken to the extreme, the Church is completely different from one moment to the next. But if we had amnesia, how would we learn our identity? With the help of others. (I'll explain at the end.)

    Pope Benedict recently addressed this very point with regard to those who say the Church after Vatican II is not the Church before:
    There is an interpretation that I would call "a hermeneutic of discontinuity and rupture"; it has frequently availed itself of the sympathies of the mass media, and also one trend of modern theology. On the other, there is the "hermeneutic of reform," of renewal in the continuity of the one subject-Church which the Lord has given to us. She is a subject which increases in time and develops, yet always remaining the same, the one subject of the journeying People of God...
    To paraphrase/update St. Augustine, who dealt with the same issue back in the 4th century, if you ask anyone before Vatican II to take you to a Catholic Church they'll take you to St. John's or St. Margaret's or Sacred Heart...etc... And then if you ask anyone after Vatican II to take you to a Catholic Church, they'll take you to...St. John's or St. Maggie's or Sacred Heart...

    January 10, 2006

    Live Blogging the Hearings (where live is actually after the fact)

    I sense that God has given us politicians mostly for entertainment purposes, for how else to take this farce? And so...

    9:36 am - Sen. Specter starts us off by not even pretending that the nomination for him is about anything other than protecting the sacrament of Abortion. Can't say he doesn't cut to the chase...The Republicans win the latest "Self-Inflicted Wound Award" for allowing a pro-choicer to head the pro-life party's judicial committee.

    9:45 am - Specter attempts to extract from the nominee a confession that Roe v. Wade is settled law (thus preventing the issue from ever be determined by dumb yuckels, aka citizens, via the democratic process). He invokes the ghost of Decisions Past, called stare decisis, which in layman's terms means: "A judicial screw up, if enshrined in law long enough, is protected". Nice work if you can get it. Try saying to your boss, "I'm not going to fix that problem because it wasn't caught quickly enough."

    9:50 am - Our Judge Alito doesn't seem a profile in courage does he? Not exactly Mr. Smith going to Washington so far. I detected something close to a "I was drinking when I said that in 1985" sentiment regarding this statement. Doesn't want to be labeled a 'strict constructionist', which can't be a good sign.

    9:52 am - [turns off set]. My prediction is that I've already learned as much about Judge Alito's judicial philosophy as the senators will by the end of the hearings.

    3:30 pm - Heard on the news that Biden spoke for 26 minutes. Not a guy at a loss for words, which makes it doubly curious that he once felt the need to plagiarize.
    Various

    Just discovered this hilarious blog, via Julie. Apparently I'm too late as he's leaving blogdom. The comments on the side are classic: "He prayed; I sent him roses; he sold them to his wife." -Therese Martin, OCD.

    ~
    C.S. Lewis and I share something in common. There's only one vice we have no temptation towards: gambling. In "God in the Dock" via Rich Leonardi:
    If it is carried out on a small scale, I am not sure that it is bad. I don't know much about it, because it is about the only vice to which I have no temptation at all, and I think it is a risk to talk about things which are not in my own makeup, because I don't understand them. If anyone comes to me asking to play bridge for money, I just say: 'How much do you hope to win? Take it and go away.'"
    Also from Rich's site, the Compendium is still in process...

    And from here:
    POPE SAYS ISLAM CAN'T REFORM [Rod Dreher]
    The Asia Times Online columnist Spengler notes that Pope Benedict XVI is recently reported to have observed that Islam cannot reform itself along the lines the West is depending on. The reason is very simple: unlike Judaism and Christianity, which take the Bible to be the inspired word of God, mediated through humans and therefore subject to interpretation, Islam believes the Koran is the literal and direct word of God, dictated to the Prophet. If you believe this, then it's easy to see why diverging too far from the plain text of the Koran is blasphemous (and we know what happens to those deemed to have blasphemed against Islam). Spengler is amazed by the silence from the Western media over this remarkable statement attributed to the current Pope...
             

    An undertaking to be pleasing to God must have three conditions: It must be sincere, selfless, and perservering. - Cure D'Ars, St. Jean-Marie de Baptiste Vianney, from Jim Curley of "Bethune Catholic"

    Anyone looking for a "warm-up exercise" [to the forthcoming papal encyclical) might consider C.S. Lewis' 1960 book "The Four Loves". The encyclical is expected to review different concepts of love, much like Lewis did in distinguishing among affection, friendship, erotic love and unconditional love. Like Lewis, Benedict will argue that if the modern world could arrive at a proper understanding of the nature of love, many problems would be on their way to resolution. - John Allen of "Word from Rome" fame

    Another blogger weds blogger union - yeah!!!!!!!!! two bits of advice on being married that have helped us the last 32 (in February) years. 1) the first 100 years are the hardest 2) in a dispute, if you discover that you are in the right, applogize immediately (and then shut up) - Alicia, commenting on news that Roz of "In Dwelling" is engaged to Henry of "A Plumbline in the Wind"

    Unfortunately the theology of "fraternal correction" among Catholic bloggers is not well developed, so I plead invincible ignorance...No doubt others could have done it much more gently. - Jeff Culbreath, after getting his IP address banned after fraternally correcting a blogger who is divorcing her husband

    A question people often ask themselves about baptism is: Why baptize small children? Why not wait until they are older and can decide freely for themselves? It is a serious question, but it can conceal a deceit. In procreating a child and giving him life, do parents first ask for his permission? Convinced that life is an immense gift, they rightly assume that one day the child will be grateful for it. A person is not asked for permission to be given a gift, and baptism is essentially this: the gift of life given to man by the merits of Christ. - Fr. Raniero Cantalamessa, the preacher to the Pontifical Household

    I would insist that the reason Scripture uses the term[s in Greek meaning] "faith" when it refers to faith in Christ is because the faith in Christ it refers to is a kind of faith, where faith is the common or garden human habit of being sure of things because someone else knows they are true. - Tom of Disputations

    J.S. Kern found himself besieged on all sides with no allies in sight, or, in his words: "I felt a bit like a half-bright lion swatting a pack of hyenas with PhD’s!" - which I suspect rather flatters the commenters' abilities while exaggerating their terminal degrees. And, considering the state of doctoral wisdom in our universities today, it might be an insult to hyenas. - Bill Luse of Apologia

    "You will catch more flies,” Saint Francis deSales used to say, “with a spoonful of honey than with a hundred barrels of vinegar." I remember from reading the life of this great saint that his friends were often scandalized by the meekness with which he received those who left the Church. And yet, this approach - wholly Catholic and truly pastoral - was able to convert an estimated 72,000 to the faith. I think there is a lesson here worth pondering for those caught in the conservative v. liberal trap. - Fr. Ronald on Amy Welborn's blog

    The second major challenge is overcoming this ghetto-like American Catholic life. As wonderful a gift to American Catholic discussion as things like Commonweal or First Things or EWTN are, I think the danger is when any one thing becomes someone's exclusive point of reference. I think we should be reading and observing all of these things. I think that's the sensibility we have to construct. - John Allen

    This is like a dispatch from another world. "Therese" [1986 film] is a ferocious, febrile movie, suffused with bridal mysticism and with an implacable otherness. Again, the lead actress carries this movie; but in every other respect "Therese" could not be more different from "Yo, La Peor de Todos." "Therese" gives no quarter to the world's standards, focusing on those aspects of Carmelite life which would be most frightening, shocking, even repellent to contemporary Americans. In doing so, of course, "Therese" also underscores how much we contemporary Americans need the uncompromising challenge Christ and the Little Flower represent. YLPDT didn't make me want to do anything in particular, except maybe see which other movies the lead actresses had starred in. "Therese" made me want to pray. - Eve Tushnet
    Well...

    ...it's Tuesday so it must be STG day. Which is good because I don't have much to say and STG covers a multitude of minutiae. Watched the riveting Country Boys documentary film on PBS last night. It's the story of two young people growing up in Eastern Kentucky and the photography alone is breath-taking. Doesn't hurt to have a mountain backdrop. (By the way, this picture of the Sago Baptist church in front of the WV mountains where the miners perished has taken on almost iconic properties.) The kids in the documentary are so real that you feel like you get to know them, in all their teenage awkwardness. There is nothing more complicated or interesting than the human heart.

    ~ <- (official O'Rama delimiter. Patent pending.)

    Just read something from the attractively appointed John Cahill site about how as he gets older midnight on New Year's Eve comes later and later. Ain't it the truth. New Year's Eve is one of those nights that diminish with age. Meanwhile, Steven of Flos Carmeli asks that we not let his mortifications mortify us, which, don't worry Steven, they don't. Rather, my sometimes Lenten mortifications mortify me, as trivial as they are compared to Steven's.

    ~
    There's a sign outside our company's identification card office. It says "I.D. Cards". This has always bothered me. What exactly does "I.D." stand for?

    ~
    The astonishing thing about the Republicans is not that they sold out, but that they did so so quickly - it took the Democrats years to get to the point of current Republican corruptness. As George Will pointed out, we expect more from the party that pretends to be for smaller government. But also it's sort of a telling signal: if they can't be trusted to adhere to their core principle then why should they be trusted with respect to anything else? (Just as a pro-choice Democrat can be safely discounted a priori, given their failure to value human life.) The most astonishing thing is how difficult it apparently is to achieve the incredibly modest reform that David Brooks suggested on "This Week": simply to have the Congress wait 72 hours before signing a spending bill, i.e. so that everyone can actually read what they're signing. Because now you get Congressmen adding things in the middle of the night. It seems well-nigh impossible to believe that America, the so-called "model democracy", has a Congress that regularly passes bills it hasn't read. Thomas Sowell once said that the "only reason to vote for Republicans is Democrats" but it seems Republicans are doing their damndest to refute this... I'm taping the Alito hazing ritual with no real desire to watch at this point, though perhaps with an appropriate drinking game it might be fun.
    On Torture

    Came across this Q&A from the book "Radio Replies", written in 1938 by Fathers Rumble & Carty:
    Q: Is the temporal punishment of torture in accordance with the teachings of Christ?

    A: It is quite lawful to inflict pain as a punishment, or no school-master could punish a rebellious child. I am grateful now for many a punishment inflicted upon me by my parents in my childhood. In principle, the infliction of pain is lawful. The question rather concerns the degree of pain to be inflicted. Excessive pain is undoubtedly wrong, unjust, inhuman, and un-Christian.

    January 09, 2006

    Excerpt II

    I'm reading about the controversy during Vatican I and the infallibility doctrine. As recorded in Dom Butler's "History of Vatican I", Bishop Las Cases, who voted 'nay' concerning the proposal, wrote in his will:
    Brought up in anti-infallibilist doctrines, during the Council I remained fixed in my opinion so long as the Council had not pronounced; but on the morrow of the definition God gave me the grace to be able to say with entire truth, in the fullness and calm of my faith, 'I believe to-day in the infallibility as thoroughly as I disbelieved it yesterday'.
    Beautiful.
    Excerpts

    From George Weigel's God's Choice, concerning Pope John Paul II's message:
    That was the challenge he laid out in World Youth Days...: never settle for less than the spiritual and moral grandeur of which, with God's grace, you're capable. Don't sell yourself short. You will fail. That's no reason to lower the bar of expectation. Get up, dust yourself off, seek forgiveness and reconciliation and try again. That is the drama of the spiritual life. Live it.
    And from the Gospel of Luke:
    ...the son of Methuselah, the son of Enoch, the son of Jared, the son of Mahalalel, the son of Kenan, the son of Enosh, the son of Seth, the son of Adam, the son of God.- Luke 3: 37-38
    Angels aver:
    'Their sinews are suffused with the memory
    though only the attuned can recall
    their once Adamic compositeness
    before the Great Sunder & Fall.

    January 08, 2006

    What a Story

    Poignant, infuriating, and inspiring all at the same time. Political correctness with respect to team nicknames is trivial, with respect to adoptions can be tragic.

    January 07, 2006

    In The Time Before Grievance Politics

    George Will opines about team nicknames & political incorrectness.



    Chief Two-Guns White Calf and his medicine man receiving the keys to the city of Oxford from Mayor Thomas King, 1927

    The picture above shows a time you could have a team named "Miami Redskins" and still have a great relationship with American Indian leaders. (About ten years ago the school changed to the "Miami Redhawks".) Chief Two-Guns White Calf's profile, by the way, was used on the buffalo nickel, a likeness of which is around his neck. (Source here.)

    January 06, 2006

    Tale of Two Celebrities

    Class is never about background or money. It's a state of mind, it's self-control, it's behavior. And on a recent Bill O'Reilly appearance on David Letterman, one showed class and one didn't.

    O'Reilly would not be riled. He was modest and self-controlled (one could say for a change, 'eh?) while Letterman was rude and belligerent: "I think sixty percent of what you say is crap" Letterman charged, which is what you say when you don't have anything to say in rebuttal.

    Letterman's chief complaint was that O'Reilly wasn't treating the left's saint, Cindy Sheehan, with enough respect. But it's her statements, such as calling the terrorists "freedom fighters", that aren't worthy of respect. That Cindy Sheehan ended up becoming the left's most visible opponent of the Iraq war is emblematic of the Democratic party and liberalism in general: emotion and sentiment substituted for ideas and principles.

    I also found it humorous that O'Reilly was taller than Letterman while they stood and shook hands, but then Lettermen's throne achieved what nature didn't. Games people play!
    Saint o' the Year

    I've received my saint(s) of the year. Have you? For me there are three since they are connected in patronages: St. Benedict the African, St. Peter Claver and St. Martin de Porres
    Miner Tragedy

    Fine meditation on the West Virgina miners.

    Panicky at the miner’s plight, we may wonder how we'd be under the torture. Is faith untested still faith? Would claustrophobic conditions accompanied by slow suffocation wring us of any sense of faith? Or would we go confidently into that good night with our God and friend? Solace came in two sources: I happened across a St. Perpetua quote. She said to the Christians watching her die, “don’t let our sufferings frighten you!” And via MamaT, Frederica Mathewes-Green writes: “those who face down death may be comforted and companioned in ways we cannot know.”
    It's Friday...

    ...and a youngish middle-age'd man's thoughts turn to beer. Beer is strong enough for a man but good for delicate ladies too:



    For medicinal purposes only. Via Victorian Trading Cards.
    German Mass

    Perhaps in honor of St. John Neumann (I used to get him and John Henry Newman confused; we learned little about saints growing up in the '70s) our parish had a Mass in German yesterday.

    Our pastor, who I have quoted in the past (by the way, that link was favorably received by my evangelical stepson, enough for him to save it) and who has been a speaker with Scott Hahn and others at the Coming Home Network conference and teaches at a local seminary too, is also a polyglot. What can't the guy do? The homily, for heaven's sake, was in German and he looked away from his notes to extemporize as he was delivering it. Very few received the Eucharist, so I assume they aren't Catholics. They could've been visiting Germans for all I know.

    My three years of high school German didn't serve me too well. The only thing I can clearly recall is the phrase, "essen sie ein Berge von Hundscheiss" (you don't want to know). Oh and the first few lines of the Deutsche versions "Our Father" and "Silent Night". Still, it seemed an opportune time to recall the German side of family even if for them this Mass would be unfamiliar since they would've heard it Latin. One lingering impression: in the words of Institution the German word for "blood", blut, sounds like what it signifies - a blunt yet mournful, spurt-like word that would seem to foreshadow the agony of the Passion.
    St. Faustina's Vision

    I'm glad the Church doesn't hold us to private revelations since, for one thing, there are so few that seem to hint of a broad salvation, let alone universal salvation. Even from the mercy saint, St. Faustina, we have this:
    One day, I saw two roads...[One led to] the abyss of hell. The souls fell blindly into it; as they walked, so they fell. And their number was so great that it was impossible to count them. And I saw the other road, or rather, a path, for it was narrow and strewn with thorns and rocks; and the people who walked along it had tears in their eyes, and all kinds of suffering befell them. Some fell down upon the rocks, but stood up immediately and went on. At the end of the road there was a magnificent garden filled with all sorts of happiness, and all these souls entered there. At the very first instant they forgot all their sufferings. (Diary 153)
    Score one for Jeff Culbreath.
    Counterintuitive but...

    Program touts free drinks for homeless alcoholics

    January 05, 2006

    Chivalry & War

    Derbyshire post at the corner talks about chivalrous behavior during war:
    It seems to have always been there. In the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle somewhere (or possibly 'The Battle of Maldon' -- no time to look it up) there's the story of some Viking longboats that pulled up to a muddy river bank to attack some Saxons dug in on high ground. Jumping out, the Vikings found themselves up to their thighs in thick mud. Seeing the enemy in this plight, the Saxons held their fire, shouting that when the Vikings had reached dry land & relieved themselves of the mud, they'd be ready for them. I forget who won the battle (though if it was Maldon of course the answer is: the Vikings).

    Even further back, around 600 BC, there was a war between the Chinese state-lets of Sung and Chu. The Chu army advanced across a river. Chivalrously, the Duke of Sung refused to attack while they were helpless in the water. As a result, he lost the battle. Mao Tse-tung, who knew his classics, was fond of saying: "I am not the Duke of Sung." Everybody got the point.
    Update: Donna Marie Lewis emails:
    I believe it was Maldon. Tolkien wrote a commentary/radio play on Maldon, in which the Lord Beorthnoth, who behaved this way, is criticized for acting in battle as if it were 'sporting'- and thus getting himself and most of his finest warriors needlessly slaughtered. It's in The Tolkien Reader.
    Thoughts Begat By Luse Piece

    Read Bill Luse's article "A Stone for Shmuel" in Touchstone yesterday. An excellent read on several levels. Personally and superficially, it was interesting to "watch" Bill & Bernadette interact. It had the element of a cliche - attractive 20-something daughter rapidly flipping through Glamour while pa watches television. We've all seen 20-somethings flipping through those magazines and I thought for a minute how she and I are so predictable in our obedience to our respective demographic. (Though she less so - my hunch is that there are precious few ardent pro-lifers on the LPGA tour.)

    My own predictability as an indicator of pop culture is such that I'd like to have bought stock in just the products and services I've used over the years. (Cue scene in Three Amigos where Ned Niederlander promises to give it all to an orphanage.) It's almost a cliche to have hated country music as a kid and like it as an adult but it's true for me and occurred during the '90s, during the Randy Travis and Garth Brooks booms. And that's one example of many. So much for my individuality.

    But back to his article. He has some of those nice Luse-ian touches that are so witheringly on target that you don't want to mess with him. Ever notice how calling a spade a spade can be so off-putting? (It got the prophets killed.) He writes of those Catholic parishes "where a remorseful conscience is not essential to the Sacrament, just a dread of penance." Ouch. He also writes of the scarcely comprehendable scene of mothers about to abort their children writing little notes like "I love you even though I cannot keep you". It's like saying I love you and I hate you in the same sentence. The human capacity for self-deception is limitless. I think the desire to cloak bad behavior in religiosity is a problem but so is simply finding safety in numbers. You might say of lust, "I know this is wrong, but everyone lusts and I know everyone can't go to hell", in other words a sort of God grades on the curve mentality.

    Bill reassures Bernadette of her beauty, both internal and external (I can vouch for the external), and that reminded me of a cartoon posted at a fitness center workout room. It shows a thin woman looking in the mirror and seeing an obese woman. In the second panel it shows an obese man looking in the mirror and seeing Brad Pitt. I wonder if there is something like that going on with the saints? Do the saints see sinners in the mirror while the sinners see saints? Of course the exception to the rule is sinners who see themselves quite accurately as sinners.

    Back to the article. It's composed in such a way to tie up at the end something mentioned at the beginning. That's good writing. If I'd have written it, it wouldn't have been so symmetrical. In fact I'd be envious if my sloth didn't forbid it. Let me 'splain - when I read good writers I'm reassured to know that I'm not wasting any talent. In the past I'd always thought that envy meant only coveting someone's fancy car or nice hairdo. It never occurred to me that there is a spiritual envy, and that I might have it. Or that (of course) it would be labeled by Fr. John Hardon as the worst form of envy, which naturally lead me to despair until I read in the same book that despair is worst sin of all. So now I'm trying to limit my envy to nice cars while presuming on God's grace. (rimshot!)

    But seriously, the proximate cause of my awareness of envy was receiving one of those mimeographed Christmas letters that some folks send out. Some call them gauche since they are impersonal in a mass-mailing sort of way, and often praise their children's exploits. But I love them because I love to read and I'm gauche too - having a blog certainly proves my gauche-ness. And so this particular letter began with an exhortation to love Jesus, followed by some of the things the person did this year - lots of volunteer work and church work - and I thought to myself 'what am I doing to advance the Kingdom?'. And then it hit me - am I annoyed because he's advertising his good deeds or because he's doing those things? I suspect the latter since it doesn't bother me when others talk of their climb up the corporate ladder or how fast they can run a 5K.

    The title is a powerfully evocative one. In the last scene of Schindler's List, Jews remember the Gentile Oskar Schindler by placing stones on his tomb. In this piece, the Gentile Luse remembers a Jewish baby killed by a Palestinian terrorist. But the story goes deeper. He refers to little stones, like pet rocks, given by one abortion mill to mothers about to have their children killed. The irony is unbearable.

    Near the end he quotes the haunting lines of William Blake: "Love seeketh only Self to please, / To bind another to its delight, / Joys in another's loss of ease, / And builds a Hell in Heaven's despite."

    January 04, 2006

    Five Books You Won't Read in Heaven

  • Prayer of Jabez - Bruce Wilkinson

  • Prayer of Jabez for Women - Bruce Wilkinson

  • Prayer of Jabez for Teens - Bruce Wilkinson

  • Prayer of Jabez for Anyone Who Still Hasn't Read My Book - Bruce Wilkinson

  • How to Get to Heaven - Billy Graham
  • Tidbit from latest National Review:

    Here is what [John Quincy] Adams says toward the end of the [History of the United States of America During the Administrations of Thomas Jefferson and James Madison], in the chapter on American character in 1817, which Wills considers the definitive testimonial to America’s emerging greatness: “That the individual should rise to a higher order either of intelligence or morality than had existed in former ages was not to be expected, for the United States offered less field for the development of individuality than had been offered by older and smaller societies. The chief function of the American Union was to raise the average standard of intelligence and well-being . . . but much doubt remained whether the intelligence belonged to a high order, or proved a high morality. . . . Time alone would decide whether it would result in a high or a low national ideal.” Time has not yet decided.

    Wills fails even to recognize the supreme question that Adams’s history leaves portentously in the air: How great can a democratic nation be without men of great prudence to lead it? For it is not folk wisdom and popular virtue that Adams shows supreme in this world. It is chance — dumb luck — which might just as easily have run the other way, because the best men lacked the force of mind to command it. - Algis Valiunas
    Downside of Blogging
    College professors complain about the result, noting the disaffection of students from their course work and the puny reserves of knowledge they bring into the classroom. But they hesitate to take a stand against mass culture and youth culture, fearful of the "dinosaur" or "conservative" tag. The disengagement of students from the liberal-arts curriculum is reaching a critical point, however...One can accept the decline, and respond as a distinguished professor of literature did at a regional Modern Language Association panel last year after I presented the findings of "Reading at Risk." "Look, I don't care if everybody stops reading literature," she blurted. "Yeah, it's my bread and butter, but cultures change. People do different things." Or one can accept the political philosopher Leo Strauss's formula that "liberal education is the counter-poison to mass culture," and stand forthrightly against the tide.
    The Cruelest Cut

    Given 24/7 cable channels and the sheer relentlessness of bad news it's easy to become jaded by death and destruction. But sometimes there is some special difference that is like a knife twist to the jugular, and with the story of the miners it was how at midnight the town, the families, the pray-ers, the men and women and children in the Baptist church who'd stormed Heaven for forty hours were all able to rejoice in the euphoria of a miracle, of answered prayer, of redemption in the utter hopelessness of the situation and then they awoke to the cruelest imaginable reversal, that only one had lived instead of only one having died. And what comfort can they take? The only assurance comes from the only Source or Assurance that really matters, that somehow, some way, all of this will look somehow pale and trivial in Heaven's garden.

    A Miner's Prayer (song by Dwight Yoakam)

    When the whistle blows each morning
    And I walk down in that cold, dark mine
    I say a prayer to my dear Savior
    Please let me see the sunshine one more time

    (Chorus:)
    When oh when will it be over
    When will I lay these burdens down
    And when I die, dear Lord in heaven
    Please take my soul from 'neath that cold dark ground

    I still grieve for my poor brother
    And I still hear my dear old mother cry
    When late that night they came and told her
    He'd lost his life down in the Big Shoal Mine

    (Chorus:)
    When oh when will it be over
    When will I lay these burdens down
    And when I die, dear Lord in heaven
    Please take my soul from 'neath that cold dark ground

    I have no shame, I feel no sorrow
    If on this earth not much I own
    I have the love of my sweet children
    An old plow mule, a shovel and a hoe

    (Chorus:)
    Are you sleepy?

    I shared last week one of my favorite documents from my place of work - the bomb threat checklist. Now, reading that post to my wife she didn't believe me. She didn't believe such a checklist existed. That post loses a lot if you don't accept the premise, so let me assure you that that was an actual handout given to everyone in the company. Believe me, I couldn't make something like that up.

    Nor what follows. This is my second most favorite unintentionally humorous directive. It warns against the danger of falling asleep at the wheel of a car, which is, of course, a serious hazard but do we need a checklist? Here it is, in its "master of the obvious" entirety:
    Are you sleepy?

    If you have one of these symptoms, you may be in danger of falling asleep at the wheel:

  • Your eyes close or go out of focus by themselves
  • You have trouble keeping your head up.
  • You can't stop yawning.
  • I suddenly feel tired. Let me confirm my checklist to make sure.

    January 03, 2006

    A Catholic, a Mormon, and an Evangelical Walked into a Bar...

    Picked up a book at the library on the LDS. Like the Jews, similar ingredients for persecution were present: clannishness, success in monetary terms, and thinking themselves as God's chosen people. Mormonism seems in some ways like sort of the ultimate anti-Protestantism. Raising another book - The Book of Mormon - to the level of Scripture must be off the charts hackle-raising for sola scriptura'ers (the fact that Catholics and Protestants have had the scriptural canon more or less closed from the 400s would suggest a gaping hole that would not go unexploited). Plus there was that polygamy thing, which the book said was hated more than slavery because slavery had a much larger support group (i.e. the South).

    I wonder if the Catholic reading about Mormonism is a similar experience to the Protestant reading about Catholicsm. Since Methodists and Episcopalians don't claim to be the one, true Church but the Church of Latter Day Saints does, that is one point of familiarity. Then too there's the nature of private revelation, though of course with the Mormonism the private revelation is public; Mormons are not allowed to reject the prophecy of Joseph Smith while Catholics can disbelieve the Marian apparations, though similar questions apply. In "The Medjugorje Deception", E. Michael Jones suspects the demonic behind the Medjugorgje apparations. And the typical rejoinder is: "why would the devil do so given the observable good fruits?". So too with Mormonism, although the answer Fr. Groeschel gives is that the devil is willing to take losses in order for later gains.
    New Year Resolves & Transformations

    The Word Among Us has a meditation in the latest issue:
    St. Paul tells us that it is God's deep desire to "transform" us by the "renewal" of our minds (Romans 12:2). On one hand, God is the only one who can show us the way to perfection. He is the only one who can transform us. But on the other hand, we have an important part to play in this transformation process.

    We may never figure out exactly how much of our spiritual growth is our doing and how much is God's grace. But we do know that it is up to us to seek God's presence and to yield ourselves to him. It is up to us to learn, through prayer and daily examination, the ins and outs of our inner lives...It involves determining which aspects of our lives we should treasure and develop, and which parts need to be put to death (Colossians 3:5).
    On the same subject of change, over the years I've picked up various clues that our pastor isn't a fan of "white-knuckled" change, where we clench our fists and teeth during the process. He recently mentioned in passing that the reason many fail at New Year's resolutions is because they are "imposing something from outside upon ourselves" and because what is required is that we know God and ourselves better.
    Nothing Special About That Mission Statement

    I was reading an article in Crisis the other day about Samuel Johnson. I don't have the quote contained therein handy, but the jist of it was that Dr. Johnson once said that they could start a university with the people present, and he listed who he thought should head each department, claiming for himself the head of the theology dep't. The author of the article said Johnson would trust no one else to that discipline, the queen of sciences, the pillar as it were to where all science and truth leads.

    Compare and contrast to the mission statement I came across of a local Catholic college, Ohio Dominican:
    Truth is the basis of human freedom and the source of human effectiveness. Truth is dynamic, an infinite realm in which the person grows throughout life to the fullness of his or her humanity through progressive realization of the significance of old truths and progressive attainment of new truths. Truth can be found in all cultures and traditions, in the whole range of the arts and sciences, and, in a special way, in religious faith and theological reflection on faith.
    "Special" is an interesting word choice in that last sentence. "Above" or "primal" or "indispensible" weren't chosen. Something can be special but not especially important (i.e. a 'special' treat). The mission statement also failed to mention Christ, who is "the Way, the Truth, and the Life". An odd mission statement for a Catholic college, though I find I learn more from bad examples than good ones and perhaps this will help. My "mission statement" as reflected in my thoughts and actions could certainly be more exemplary of Christ.

    UPDATE: Bill writes pithily: "anybody trying that hard to define 'truth' don't know what it is. They use the word 5 times in two sentences." Ain't it da truth.
             

    Being a Catholic writer...does not mean the propagation of Church propaganda on hordes of "simple-minded faithful" or blindly trying to fit every fictional character and circumstance into the conventional moulds of sinner-turn-saints. The powerful action of Grace cannot be doubted but such stiff-jointedly coercive measures only serve to emphatically demarcate its boundaries when in fact, where Grace starts and where Grace ends is an eternal mystery, even to the recipients of that great gift. Some factions thumb their noses at Narnia which is chockful of religious allegory at every turn. Yet let us also remember the audience for whom this book was written:
    "My dear Lucy, I wrote this story for you, but when I began it I had not realized that girls grow up quicker than books. As a result you are already too old for fairy tales, and by the time it is printed and bound you will be older still. But some day you will be old enough to start reading fairy tales again. You can then take it down from some upper shelf, dust it, and tell me what you think of it. I shall probably be too deaf to hear, and too old to understand, a word you say, but I shall still be your affectionate Godfather, C.S.Lewis"
    Children's books often have a simple truth in them that adults tend to forget or suppress in their pursuit of multitudes of worldly pleasures and gains. Perhaps a good way to extricate oneself from the mess would be to start by picking up a favourite book that one had pored over in younger days? - Half-baked Taters

    My own practice is to say little about the enemy of our souls; because that generally validates his conceit and deceit. I would point to Sacred Scripture: you will go quite a way into the Bible before you will encounter an actual reference to any supernatural power other than God or his messengers (as opposed to passages understood, in light of later revelation, as referring to such forces). When evil spirits are mentioned in the Old Testament, they are described as under God's control -- i.e., God "sent" an evil spirit to torment Saul. It is not really until the Gospels that you get a significant amount of information about such forces -- and notice, it is the Son of God who does battle with them, and he simply silences them and casts them out. He doesn't seem very interested in them -- he knows all he needs to know. And that's the Son of God. - Fr. Martin Fox

    Innocence is a nice-sounding word, but if properly understood it is a thing to be feared. The soul confronted with innocence is forced to deal with its own culpability. That, I believe, is why the world hates children: when it can't get them aborted, it aborts their siblings and cousins, breaks up their families, herds them into socialist indoctrination camps called "schools", rots their brains with television, poisons their souls with popular music, deprives them of truth and beauty, robs them of sacramental grace, and otherwise assaults them with every kind of depravity known to man... In the beginning, Christianity was for the strong and heroic - those made strong by the spirit of Jesus Christ. Then there was Christendom, an instrument of God's mercy for the weak multitudes (to which I myself belong), which provided all kinds of incentives to faith and virtue. Today we are returning to a time of active hostility to the truth: increasingly, faith in our age is only for the strong...The modern world thus chisels away at Christian belief a little at a time and most of us barely notice. - Jeff of "Hallowed Ground"

    Soon after reading [McBrien's] "Catholicism" I happened to pick up the Catechism of the Catholic Church. This for me put everything into perspective. The hit and miss theology I had been running up against fell against this cohesive whole of the actual teachings of the Catholic Church in one place...Introduction to Catholic radio especially Catholic Answers and EWTN's Catholic Q&A showed me the internet's "briny hot water"...It didn't take long to find out about the liturgical wars and the rampant dissent within the Church. I am glad though that my reading had fortified me in ecclesiology and the guidance by the Holy Spirit of the Church before I would have had a chance to be scandalized by disunity. From the outside it is easy to see why our sometimes petty bickering serves as an excuse for others not to enter the Church. Luckily God is not limited by our nonsense since he can write straight with crooked lines. My own crooked path was from wannabe hippie->bleeding heart liberalism->political agnosticism->materialistic conservatism->Randian Positivism->theism->Catholic Church. I do wonder what I would have thought of Catholic blogs and religious blogs in general if they had been around when I was in my theistic search phase? - Curt Jester, on his conversion experiences

    I think the charge of anti-Catholic bigotry is going a bit far, though. In "Lake Woebegon Days", if I remember correctly, [Garrison Keillor] wrote of sitting with the Plymouth Brethen in their barren meeting room and wishing he was Catholic. The chapter was side-splittingly funny to this cradle Catholic - GK dreamt of his family suddenly turning into Italian Catholics and hauling in oil paintings of nudes,statues of saints, vats of spaghetti and meatballs, and cases of red wine and "doing the Motorola." Instead, he was stuck with tuna casserole and Swedish meatballs and bookbags with Biblical verses imprinted on them. It reminded me of Dunstan Ramsay, a character in Robertson Davies' great "The Deptford Trilogy," who, as a Scottish Presbyterian child in a small Canadian town, reads "The Lives of the Saints" in secret because he's so utterly fascinated by all this colorful, exotic Catholic stuff. - commenter on Amy Welborn's blog

    One of the reasons I came to believe that Christianity is true is the astonishing level of hatred, animosity, and mockery it generates. No one would go this far out of his way to diss Hindus or Buddhists – only Christians are considered both fair game and worth the effort. - Waffling Anglican

    There is nothing more sobering than a 30 year old newspaper. You can’t figure out what the headlines mean. You don’t know who the people are. Theodore Green, John Sparkman, George Reedy, Jack Watson, Kenneth Duberstein. You thumb through page after page of vanished concerns—issues that apparently were vitally important at the time, and now don’t matter at all. It’s amazing how many pressing concerns are literally of the moment. - Michael Crichton, via Rock of "Lofted Nest"
    Contra Legacy Concerns

    I was reading Brian Lamb's book about presidential gravesites last week and LBJ was so concerned about his legacy that it was a bit nauseating. To one man he said "excellent men have been trying for 40 years to save my reputation; what makes you think you can?". And to preacher Billy Graham, concerning his eulogy, "tell them about all the good things I've done". So was LBJ's concern about poverty and race relations mainly about LBJ - about his reputation, about his "salvation" where salvation is described as his legacy? Could this be said of the Christian more worried about personal salvation than pleasing God?

    January 02, 2006

    Interesting Quotes

    From Bishop Ullathorne's notes about the First Vatican Council written in 1870 (source Dom Butler's history):
    If you want the glare, the glittering flat-eyed glare of enthusiasm on an idea divested of all consideration for the world and the humanity in which it is to work, fanaticism in short, you must pick out certain men of Spanish birth or extraction. One might think from them that fixed and hard ideas, pushed to the furthest extreme, were just the cure for all human ills. They very much need a dose of Dr. Newman's Grammar of Assent. They seem to fancy that men and women, the actual creatures of this world, are spirits living on fixed ideas, and devoid of disturbing elements...But why should I inflict on you the scourge of fanaticism that has been inflicted on me and on others who have seen much of mankind in many ways, and who know the human race cannot be sharply divided between luminous believers and deliberately malignant heretics. And yet these men have such kindly genial hearts, when you get through their crust of gravity and reserve towards strangers.
    __

    Historian Paul Johnson can't make the call on whether anti-modernist popes helped or hurt:
    Pio Nono [Pope Piux IX] was the maker of the modern papacy. His strategy of opposition to modernity had its losses and gains. The true reward or cost is known to God alone.
    St. Basil's Liturgy & Christmas Carols


    Image via Korrektiv

    The Byzantine branch of Catholicism celebrated St. Basil's feast on January 1st and honored him by recited the lengthy Eucharist prayer he composed. A fine tribute, surely one he would've wanted. It increased the length of the service by over 30 minutes (to about an hour and a half) and afterwards the priest said: "Now see that wasn't so bad, was it? Beats hanging on the cross for three hours. And who didn't we pray for? That's right - no one. And what do you think Christ was doing on the cross for three hours? He was praying for everybody, including each one of us. He wasn't belly-aching or wishing it was over."

    This was interesting to me because there's always a bit of tension concerning how to view Christ's sufferings. For some, quoting the 22nd Psalm and mentioning his thirst were evidences of the humanity of Christ, and of allowing us to relate to Him and identify with the sense of abandonment he felt. For others, when He quotes that Psalm it is a prayer and a strong hint of his messiahship, rather than a feeling of being abandoned. And when he says that he thirsts, it's not for water but for souls. I suppose it's not either/or but and/both. Though certainly it seems superhuman to pray for others while you yourself are suffering intensely, the fact that saints have done so (we just celebrated St. Stephen's day) means that Christ did so first, as when he prayed "Father, forgive them for they know not what they do".
    __

    Listening to Christmas carols during Advent is okay, if premature. Listening to them in the Christmas season is wonderful. But hearing them at Mass is powerfully affecting. "What Child is This?" heard while receiving Communion brings the message home in a wholly different way. ("Mean estate" indeed.)


    Old Stories in a Bottle Washed Ashore

    Heaps in drawers, unmouldered words,
    the produce of ancient typewriters,
    memos preserved from a younger self
    like films of vintage prize fighters.

    They appear as etchings of people once fair
    in amber they're caught undisturbed,
    but now I cringe at how time has eroded
    pleasure once given unperturbed.

    They only attract in a time-capsule way
    but at least I can say I’ve improved,
    and I wonder if what I’ve written today
    I’ll look back on likewise unmoved.
    Your Guide to...
    How to Feel Cheerful Despite Our F-Ups

    Q: Why the New American Bible?

    A: To remind us that bishopric mischief can't destroy the Church, proof of divine protection (see this). The NAB was also designed in order to encourage us to "offer it up" and to allow us to feel solidarity with the hierarchy by reminding us that it's not only lay people who hose things up.

    Q: Fr. Jim of "Dappled Things" posts about daily communicant who is a lousy person

    A: The obligatory response is: "Just think how bad he'd be without the sacrament!" (See Graham Greene and Evelyn Waugh)

    Q: Robert Hanson, FBI spy for the Soviets & member of Opus Dei...predatory gay priests and the bishops who enabled them...

    A: They were caught. Providential? The chance to repent before death is a great grace.

    January 01, 2006

    History of a Parish Priest   - one who made a difference at a parish in my home town


    -- Fr. Cogan & a First Communion Class

    Fr. Cogan was born in 1867 - about twenty years after his teenage father emigrated from Ireland to escape the famine - and was ordained in 1901. In July of 1929 he became the first Irish priest at a German Catholic parish. From a local history:
    "The Cogan years are not remembered nor celebrated because of building of buildings but rather for the keen business and spiritual leadership he exhibited in overcoming and eventually erasing the enormous debt which hung over the parish like a cloud of poisonous gas ready to choke the life from all caught in its wake. Fr. Cogan built fiscal structures which not only removed the burden of indebtedness in his day but remain even today as major revenue sources to support the operation of parish and school.

    Within two months after Fr. Cogan began to rally parishioners, the country was hit with the stock market crash. The years following the event have been called the Great Depression. To have defaulted on the loans during those years would have been understood by all - all, that is, except Fr. Cogan."
    Bingo is a much-maligned Catholic fundraiser but in 1936, the success of the game at a parish festival led Fr. Cogan and the parish committee to institute what would be a weekly Bingo, one of the first in the area. It proved to be highly popular and was attended by crowds numbering up to 4,000 players. More from the history:
    "Fr. Cogan's pastorate was more than debt reductions. For nineteen and a half years, Fr. Cogan was a prominent figure in the Deanery and throughout the city. He initiated and encouraged several new societies, groups and associations at St. Joseph. The parish was the focal point of the everyday life and activities of the parishioners. Numerous missions were conducted during Fr. Cogan's pastorate.
    __

    Following a lengthy period in the hospital, Fr. John Cogan died at the age of 81 on December 7, 1948. His body was returned to St. Joseph Church to lay in state from 4:00pm on Dec. 11, 1948 until his funeral at 10:30am the next morning. The parishioners came to the church throughout the night keeping a prayer vigil for the soul of their faithful shepherd."
    Goodbye to '05 and the NYT

    Pleasures are always temporary, and a pleasure I used to have was reading the Sunday NY Times.

    During the '90s, I'd read it cover to cover, or rather first page to last. I stopped around '98, around the time it started becoming ridiculous.

    But I thought today I'd treat myself for old time's sake though it turned out to be a pleaure only a masochist would enjoy. In the second sentence of the first article I came across, a front page story about George Bush's vacation, the "news" writer states of Crawford, "He never even ventured into the little town of 600, not even to the cheeseburger joint he often uses as a political tool to show that he is in touch with his neighbors."

    Nice little jab, and nice that he got to it so quickly. I suppose for that to be fact, George Bush must've said at some point, "I often use that cheeseburger joint as a political tool to show I'm in touch with my neighbors." Absent that, the writer is taking liberties, as apparently is the journalist's privilege, while at the same time adding to the cynicism of daily life. With the press and Bush, he's damned if he does, damned if he doesn't, which certainly makes the presidency a way to age quickly. I'm glad the W doesn't read the NY Times - I wouldn't either if I were him. And it's certainly not surprising that a proportionately small percentage of journalists believe in God; the mindset for a journalist reading the gospels must be one of "what's in this for God? He's got to be perpetrating the biggest scam in history."

    It's true politicians are usually venal and far too compromising for our tastes, and they have to do things to ensure their electability. But I wonder if newspapers and politicians don't make each other worse. Politicians do things that make newspapers cynical. Newspapers, corrosively cynical, make politicians do things in order to serve appearances.

    Still, is it too much to ask to back up assertions made on the front page of the "world's newspaper"? And to stop mind-reading?

    Meanwhile, I'll stop reading.