December 28, 2023

When Did Smoke of Satan Enter?

Rabbit hole of rabbit holes is the papacy of Francis and the state of the Church. It started when my wife sent this post about some seemingly targeted lightning strikes. “Press releases from Heaven” is a memorable phrase. 

The same author is convinced that Pope Francis is not the legit pope due to Benedict leaving another duress, an “impeded See”. I’m sketchy on the details and terminology but the gist seems to be that Benedict was playing 3d chess (far more believable in his case than The Donald’s). He makes that case here.

Somewhere along the rabbit trail I came across the famous “smoke of Satan” line by Pope Paul VI - which makes credible just about anything with regard to church irregularities, just the rich vein of government lies and censorship suddenly makes conspiracy theories well worth our attention. 

The smoke of Satan line was said on June 29th, 1972 but Malachi Martin places the smoke coming on June 29th, 1963. Which fits neatly into the general theory that 1963 was some sort of inflection point given the deaths of JFK, Tolkien and C.S. Lewis. It was also the year when sex was begun in Britain, according to Philip Larkin's best-known poem. Bob Dylan’s "Blowin' in the Wind” was popular and “The End of the World" by Skeeter Davis.

Liturgy is the linchpin of the spiritual world, and thus the world in general, we might wonder if anything smoky came in the immediate aftermath of that June 29th event? 

Well here we read that seminal books of essays were given imprimaturs before the huge game changing December release of Sacrosanctum Concilium.

Both Sunday Morning Crisis and The Revival of the Liturgy have imprimaturs dating from the summer of 1963, before the second session of Vatican II had even begun. So these essays interpreted Sacrosanctum Concilium before it was eventually promulgated on December 4, 1963, or even fully discussed at the Council. 

These imprimaturs came just post-smoke of Satan, in July and August.  I report, you decide. 

December 19, 2023

On Parents Who Did Everything Right

Interesting and frank homily from a local priest on the gospel of Zechariah and Elizabeth having their son John the Baptist despite their advanced age: 

“A question I get from parents a million times is, ‘but we did everything right - what happened?’ Or they frame it as, ‘our kids don’t go to Mass..what did we do wrong?” 

When they say they did everything right they add, ‘we sent them to Catholic schools and a Catholic college’ and I’m always tempted to say - but thank God have always resisted - ‘the answer is implicit in what you said...you sent them to Catholic schools’.  

The gospel says Zechariah and Elizabeth were righteous, that they did everything right and still he had no child. Ironically, Zechariah only did something wrong after he received the grace of a child, by his doubting of the angel. 

The core of our faith is ‘grace’, a blessing, an unmerited gift. Grace means that not everything we do, whether right or wrong, matters. God has His plans. It was only after Zechariah gave up his plan for his son and accepted God’s plan for John (by writing, ‘his name is John’ instead of after himself) that he got his speech back. 

Back in the day the church only had masses on Sunday. It was decided that we would add the Saturday vigil since many Catholics who worked on Sundays, like taxi drivers and restaurant workers, would be able to therefore attend mass. The expectation was that mass attendance would go up. But it was immediately shown that there was no increase whatsoever, that some people who previously went on Sundays just changed when they went to mass. The church did the right thing but it bore no fruit, and didn’t achieve the intended result. Zechariah was faithful for many decades but still received no child.  

St Paul wrote that he planted the seed, Apollos watered it, but God makes it grow.”

December 14, 2023

Rep. Mike Carey's Constitutional Bah Humbug

Donald Trump is a famously bad judge of character (Fauci, anyone?) and his endorsement of our local congressman was no exception. Mike Carey has moved easily from Ohio swamp creature to D.C. swamp creature with hardly a ripple. 

He promised he'd vote like Jim Jordan but has voted nothing like him on anything besides "naming a post office" votes. 

It all started with the curious case of his Ukraine funding fetish. This would not seem to be a natural fit for an outside, first term congressman. But he came to D.C. with his Raytheon-issued boots on. He came ready to fill the swamp.  

His latest outrage was to vote for the NDAA (national defense act). As he surely knows, warrantless queries, also known as “backdoor searches,” are inconsistent with a free society and violate our Fourth Amendment rights.  

On paper this would seem to be an easy vote since it's bipartisan. Every fair-minded American wants the FISA process limited since it can be used against Republicans, Democrats, and Independents. It's not an economic or social issue where there can be honest disagreement (if not much on the latter). 

By its own admission, the FBI and CIA are less fearful of foreign terrorists than Trump supporters so why should Carey be so protective of backdoor searches given that foreign terrorists are such a benign threat? 

Carey is in a "purple" district, which means presumably he has to take some tough votes. But NDAA, really? Are Democrats and Independents in his district dying to continue jack up the military industrial complex and continue the war on American citizens? 

Whatever blackmail the deep state has on Carey, it certainly appears to be working. 

December 06, 2023

Pope Pius on Christ & Politics

About a hundred years ago Pope Pius XI wrote of the feast of Christ the King and it feels as if it could’ve been written yesterday. A few excerpts: 

It would be a grave error to say that Christ has no authority whatever in civil affairs, since, by virtue of the absolute empire over all creatures committed to him by the Father, all things are in his power.  Nevertheless, during his life on earth he refrained from the exercise of such authority, and although he himself disdained to possess or to care for earthly goods, he did not, nor does he today, interfere with those who possess them.

If, therefore, the rulers of nations wish to preserve their authority, to promote and increase the prosperity of their countries, they will not neglect the public duty of reverence and obedience to the rule of Christ. What we said at the beginning of our pontificate concerning the decline of public authority, and the lack of respect for the same, is equally true at the present day. "With God and Jesus Christ," we said, "excluded from political life, with authority derived not from God but from man, the very basis of that authority has been taken away, because the chief reason of the distinction between ruler and subject has been eliminated. The result is that human society is tottering to its fall, because it has no longer a secure and solid foundation."

Our Lord's regal office invests the human authority of princes and rulers with a religious significance; it ennobles the citizen's duty of obedience. It is for this reason that St. Paul, while bidding wives revere Christ in their husbands, and slaves respect Christ in their masters, warns them to give obedience to them not as men, but as the vicegerents of Christ; for it is not by chance that men redeemed by Christ should serve their fellow-men. 

If princes and magistrates duly elected are filled with the persuasion that they rule, not by their own right, but by the mandate and in the place of the Divine King, they will exercise their authority piously and wisely, and they will make laws and administer them, having in view the common good and also the human dignity of their subjects. The result will be a stable peace and tranquillity, for there will be no longer any cause of discontent. Men will see in their king or in their rulers men like themselves, perhaps unworthy or open to criticism, but they will not on that account refuse obedience if they see reflected in them the authority of Christ God and Man. Peace and harmony, too, will result; for with the spread and the universal extent of the kingdom of Christ men will become more and more conscious of the link that binds them together, and thus many conflicts will be either prevented entirely or at least their bitterness will be diminished.

It is necessary that the kingship of our Savior should be as widely as possible recognized and understood, and to the end nothing would serve better than the institution of a special feast. For people are instructed in the truths of faith, and brought to appreciate the inner joys of religion far more effectually by the annual celebration of our sacred mysteries than by any official pronouncement of the teaching of the Church. Such pronouncements usually reach only a few and the more learned among the faithful; feasts reach them all; the former speak but once, the latter speak every year - in fact, forever. The church's teaching affects the mind primarily; her feasts affect both mind and heart, and have a salutary effect upon the whole of man's nature. Man is composed of body and soul, and he needs these external festivities so that the sacred rites, in all their beauty and variety, may stimulate him to drink more deeply of the fountain of God's teaching, that he may make it a part of himself, and use it with profit for his spiritual life.

History, in fact, tells us that in the course of ages these festivals have been instituted one after another according as the needs or the advantage of the people of Christ seemed to demand: as when they needed strength to face a common danger, when they were attacked by insidious heresies, when they needed to be urged to the pious consideration of some mystery of faith or of some divine blessing. Thus in the earliest days of the Christian era, when the people of Christ were suffering cruel persecution, the cult of the martyrs was begun in order, says St. Augustine, "that the feasts of the martyrs might incite men to martyrdom." The liturgical honors paid to confessors, virgins and widows produced wonderful results in an increased zest for virtue, necessary even in times of peace. But more fruitful still were the feasts instituted in honor of the Blessed Virgin. As a result of these men grew not only in their devotion to the Mother of God as an ever-present advocate, but also in their love of her as a mother bequeathed to them by their Redeemer.

When reverence and devotion to the Blessed Sacrament had grown cold, the feast of Corpus Christi was instituted, so that by means of solemn processions and prayer of eight days' duration, men might be brought once more to render public homage to Christ. So, too, the feast of the Sacred Heart of Jesus was instituted at a time when men were oppressed by the sad and gloomy severity of Jansenism, which had made their hearts grow cold, and shut them out from the love of God and the hope of salvation.

The feast of the Kingship of Christ, which in future will be yearly observed, may hasten the return of society to our loving Savior. It would be the duty of Catholics to do all they can to bring about this happy result. Many of these, however, have neither the station in society nor the authority which should belong to those who bear the torch of truth. This state of things may perhaps be attributed to a certain slowness and timidity in good people, who are reluctant to engage in conflict or oppose but a weak resistance; thus the enemies of the Church become bolder in their attacks. But if the faithful were generally to understand that it behooves them ever to fight courageously under the banner of Christ their King, then, fired with apostolic zeal, they would strive to win over to their Lord those hearts that are bitter and estranged from him, and would valiantly defend his rights.

While nations insult the beloved name of our Redeemer by suppressing all mention of it in their conferences and parliaments, we must all the more loudly proclaim his kingly dignity and power, all the more universally affirm his rights.


December 05, 2023

Numerical Significance in the Cancelling of Catholic Masses During Covid

I looked back at my journal during the covid period of ten weeks (ten Sundays) of no public masses. It was about 3/16 to 5/31, or 70 days. 

The suppression of public masses across the world seems an epochal event, something I can't imagine has ever happened in church history. 

So I checked out some of the biblical symbolism of 10 and 70. I found this on a non-Catholic site about the number 10: 

“As 10 represented God’s governmental rule, so does the number 10 represent the rule of mankind but also the Evil One behind man’s government (as we see in the 10 toes of Daniel 2 and in Revelation chapter’s 13 and 17 of the beast with the 10 horns). ...Throughout the Bible horns are representative of strength and great power.  In Revelation 2:10 Jesus tells the church as Smyrna, “The Devil will keep on throwing some of you into prison that you may be fully put to the test, and that you may have tribulation ten days.”

There were also ten plagues on the Egyptians, and exactly ten generations that lived up to the flood of Noah’s day when the flood of God’s judgment came. 

On 70, the Egyptians mourned the death of Joseph for 70 days and the years Israel was in exile in Babylon was 70 years. 

December 04, 2023

Book Review: Naomi Klein's Latest

The intriguing conceit of the book "Doppelgänger" is how the accident of their same first names, ethnic background, occupations and oppositional political positions led Klein to become obsessed with the “other” Naomi: Naomi Wolf. 

Reading Klein is like a voyeur reading a voyeur and it’s interesting to see the funhouse mirror world that Klein inhabits. But what makes it more interesting is she’s not blind to all of her side’s idiocies.  Her mix of credulity (when it comes to the government and Pharma during Covid) and sophisticated self-awareness makes for a compelling read, such as when she writes: “…when something becomes an issue in [conservative world] it automatically ceases to matter everywhere else. This has happened on so many issues that I sometimes feel as if we are tethered to each other as reverse marionettes…” 

Similarly she makes a cogent point about the dangers of what she calls “progressive-cloaked capitalism”, saying it leads to a “war on meaning”, and that what unites the far left and far right is hyper-individualism.

She sees Leftists who have gone to the dark side as unprincipled grifters, but it’s telling she never mentions someone like a Dr Peter Mccullough or a Glenn Greenwald. Klein prefers to “punch down”. 

It’s interesting to see how seriously she takes her legacy and brand and while she’s hardly alone in that it’s a cautionary tale. It's the story of modern journalism in which what elites think of you is far more important than the truth. She seems crushed by Philip Roth’s tarnished legacy, wondering what hope there is for her if his wealth and contrivances failed to protect him. Perhaps that’s the point and lesson: wealth and herculean efforts at self-salvation fail.

The Leftist tendency towards totalitarianism is reflected in her desire for a monopoly on language. She sees, apparently, no debasement in Leftist use of terms like “racist” or “white nationalist” (and, in fact, invokes them spuriously in the book) but also finds it painful when populists use the Left’s proprietary terms like “fake news” and “othering”. She “others” Bannon in this book while accusing him of appropriating the term. (Apparently only leftists are allowed to be among the “other”.)

Her religious bigotry or ignorance is noticeable also in saying that religious people think faith is a defense against disease when actually religious people believe there is an afterlife, which means they aren’t as deathly afraid of disease as she. 

All that said, she is a fine writer and a better one than her doppelgänger. She is wise in saying that the censorship of covid discussion gave fuel to conspiracy theorists and even faults herself for not questioning the narrative, due to not wanting to be conflated with conspiracy theorists. In other words, the truth is not something to be sought for its own sake but strategically deployed which leads to all sorts of negative second order effects.  

One suspects that without the angst over her reputation and legacy she would be freer to seek veracity in directions that do not align with the world’s opinion and may even occasionally align, heaven forfend, with her doppelgänger’s.

November 12, 2023

2018: The Year of the Red Pill

For me personally, I think 2018 was the pivotal “before/after” year politically and ecclesiastically.  Before 2018 things felt stable, more or less. Sure the pope had put out the controversial AMORIS LÆTITIA in 2016 and an argument could easily be made that that was the signal event, but at the time I thought perhaps it could be explained away or that it was a trial balloon of some sort.  I had no expectations of this being a positive papacy but my attitude was, “we had two decades of conservative popes, now we shall have a decade of liberal”. Fair is fair. 

On the political front, Trump had won in ’16 and was drawing a vitriol that was shocking if not unprecedented (see George W Bush).  You could say that in 2016 the “germs” of great destabilization had been planted (Francis’s ’16 synod and the FBI’s Russia probe of Trump which began in ’16). But it took 2-3 years for the fruits to be exposed and me to catch up with the reality. 

2018 was the crazy year in the Church. We learned of Cardinal McCarrick, who had helped write church policy in the U.S. on pedophilia while having a record of it himself.  It was a wake-up call that the corruption in the church was far greater than we knew. At the same time an innocent prelate trying to fix church finances, Cardinal Pell of Australia, was jailed on a made-up charge.  The combo was so unsettling. Pell would eventually be free’d after a couple years awaiting trials, but McCarrick’s allies continue in the church unaffected. 

Politically 2018 was a watershed year because of the Kavannaugh hearings. The level of bloodsport was off the charts and it didn’t feel like politics but something more demonic. 

Meanwhile, Robert Mueller was still dragging out his report. For three years they’d been investigating Trump on a hunch that he colluded with the Russia government to win the ’16 election and serve Russian interests.  Mueller was seen by some as a Boy Scout, a patriot, who would close the case within a month when he realized that there was no case. Instead he dragged it on till mid-2019 -- thus diverting, distracting, and dividing the American people.  After 2018 I could never see the Democrats, media, or FBI/DOJ the same way. 

So ’18 was the pivotal “before/after” year politically & ecclesiastically.  Before then there seemed a stability, a quality of “things are different but not radically so”. But the guilty McCarrick and innocent Pell red-pilled me. As did the Kavannaugh hearings in ’18 and Russia hoax.

2019 followed up with further confirmations of the destabilization.  You could say that 2018 was the intellectual awakening while 2019 was the more intangible, emotional kind. There was the weird Pope Francis Amazon synod with the Pachamama idol and the fire at Notre Dame in Paris which felt somehow prophetic.  The Mueller report landed with a dud (the equivalent of George Bush rolling into the Baghdad and finding no weapons of mass destruction in 2003), and then the sham House impeachment of Trump.  

So before covid, before the Antifa and BLM riots in ’20, before the stolen ’20 election, before the January 6th entrapment and subsequent hostage-taking by the government, we were already living in a world that felt very different from, say, the Bill Clinton years.

November 02, 2023

Putting the Local in WinRed Corruption

One of the last American journalists, James O'Keefe, put up this video with an interview with a woman who had no clue that she had donated something like $10,000 to the WinRed political PAC in small dollar donations over a short period of time.  Seems likely foreign money influencing our elections. 

I went to the FEC website, put in my zip code, and literally in two minutes found a guy with a "problematic" donation history. You have to laugh at how much a joke our country is at this point...





October 30, 2023

Tom Luongo on Trump's Iran Mistake

Tom Luongo: 

I can see the argument that Iran and Russia forced the US to choose between Ukraine and Israel, I can see that the US is forcing Russia to choose between Ukraine and Syria. 

Do I think trading Ukraine for Syria a good trade for Russia? Of course, in every way. Iran can defend Syria at this point; what is NATO going to do? 

When you play out the series of moves it doesn’t end well for the United States which is exactly the plan. Iran has to take the punch in the mouth, they have to sacrifice Hamas, the Palestinians. 

Even Trump is talking about going to war with Iran. The Republican caucus here in Florida is demanding DeSantis stop his presidential campaign. Why? Because Trump just came out in favor of going to war with Iran. Meaning, there’s been a deal made.  And he’ll do this. We have four years of evidence that Trump will do whatever the British want him to do even though it was the British (Steele dossier) that brought on Russia/Russia/Russia. He had four years of these neocons running operation after operation against him and then he comes out and says this, at this moment in time, when he’s got a 50-point lead and every other neocon is dropping out of the race? When everybody who is a Republican of any note wants war,  and Trump who owns the Republican base, could have shown leadership and said, ‘What happened in Israel was terrible.....” and stopped there. We don’t have to be the 800lb gorilla going all over the world beating everyone over the head. 

The Iranians invented chess and the Russians perfected it, the British invented statecraft and now we’re going to watch who perfected that. It’s really dumb, and yet it’s where we’re headed because everybody’s incentives line up for war. Today we are closer to an absolutely ugly long-form conflict than we have ever been. 

October 27, 2023

The Gospels Show that There's No Limiting Principle to Hate

In the gospels, a scourged and humiliated Jesus is presented by Pilate to the crowds. Pilate thought this would be enough for them, but there’s no limiting principle to hate. So why am I surprised to see that pictures of dead Israelis only create marches with Palestinian signs in American streets saying “finish the job”? 

Why am I surprised that at the end of Russia hoax, there were no apologies or sack cloth and ashes? Why am I surprised that after the Kavanaugh hearing and Kavanaugh being stalked by a gun with a gun, that it didn’t mortify the Democrats? Or why, after Steve Scalise was almost murdered by a Sanders support, that that wasn’t the “come to Jesus” moment? And why am I surprised that a justice system would put hundreds in prison for misdemeanor offenses would not result in the DoJ saying, “that is enough.” 

If the crowds didn’t think it was enough for Jesus to suffer a scourging that hastened his death, then they certainly won’t be moved by a Trump supporter who trespassed on Capitol grounds or a dead young Israeli woman. The gospels are ever timely. 

As John Zmirak recently wrote that our anger should be directed at spineless Republicans and not Democrats: 

"I’m not writing about this to pump up rage at Democrats. That’s like getting angry at alligators, for trying to bite off your legs. Gators gonna … gator. That party is no longer a mainstream, patriotic organization...Their party is no longer under human control, but is instead fully operated by principalities and powers, whose hunger for the blood of the unborn and the severed genitals of children will not be denied. The only response to 'political' programs that stink of brimstone is prayer and fasting. We don’t elect men to Congress and expect them to serve as exorcists."

October 26, 2023

If Lawmakers Could Have Sex with Ukraine They Would

Interesting commentary from Mark Wauck on the mysterious allure Ukraine has for a large segment of US lawmakers:

McCarthy made a variety of commitments in order to get the votes he needed to be elected Speaker. One of those commitments was that there would be no blanket Continuing Resolutions (CR)—spending bills would be voted on in separate categories. Typically a Speaker will not bring a bill up for a vote unless a majority of his party is on board with it. However, when it came time to send more money to Ukraine, McCarthy realized that he did not have a majority of Republicans on board. To get around his own party’s majority, he violated his commitment and bundled the Ukraine aid into a CR that was then passed with the help of Dems—over the heads of the majority of Republicans.

Gaetz pulled the plug on McCarthy because McCarthy had violated his pledge, but what precipitated it was the Ukraine issue. No doubt various members had various reasons for not wanting to pass the aid to Ukraine. Some, like Johnson, wanted provisions for tracing what happened to the money that was being shipped to Ukraine. That the Deep State could not tolerate. They demanded a blank check, in a manner of speaking.

Now Johnson—third in the presidential succession—will control the process. This not only complicates funding for the Neocon war on Russia, it also complicates any scheme to remove Biden before he can run again. Interesting times.

Tale of Two Views

I recently experienced an interesting convergence of readings from two very different sources: one an erudite atheistic political philosopher and the other a Pentecostal minister and Trump supporter. 

See the convergence, first from the political guru: 

Nowadays every dog in the street know that "wokeness" aka "political correct-ness" aka "progressivism" aka "social justice" is a religion. In 2008 it was an Archimedes-tier insight. That flash of genius was so bomb-intense it gave me, like, genius Tourette's, and I wanted to run naked out of the bathtub screaming Eureka.

I discovered, back in 2008, that the prewar mainline Protestant missionary-industrial complex in the process of morphing into the postwar secular aid-industrial complex. Having shown that our supposedly secular technocracy was in fact a theocracy—and not only that, a theocracy tied to what had been the most powerful English-speaking religious movement (growing out of English Calvinism) for 400 years—felt to me like a complete and sufficient disproof of the state.

After all, the fundamental principle of modern government is the separation of church and state. Nothing could be more important! And yet, simply by evolving away its belief in God— the way a cancer cell evolves away its MHC complex, which tags it for the immune system—this new religion has become basically as powerful as Islam in Iran. Certainly, if you replace all instances of "social justice" etc. with a reference to Allah, etc., you are looking at a pretty darned Muslim country.

Tracing it to the 16th century is easy. Across time, its devotees have been called Calvinists, Brownists, Independents, Dissenters, Puritans, Unitarians, and so on. It was the founding religion of Harvard. It remains the ruling religion of Harvard. Nothing ever happens, nothing ever changes.

The truth is that every stable government is a theocracy —a marriage of church and state. The problem with modern Puritanism is not that it is too integrated with the regime. It is not integrated enough. It is superior to the state; it should be subordinate.The "woke religion" holds unaccountable power over the regime-whereas it (and all other religions) should actually be subject to the secular authorities.

And then from evangelist Lance Wallnau in his book "Chaos Code", who uses the examples from the Old Testament where renewal (including the rebuilding of the Temple in Jerusalem) only come from the combined efforts of a statesman and a religious leader. With the Temple, there would’ve been no rebuilding without both the political statesman Cyrus and Nehemiah and Ezra. 

He brings up Pope John Paul II as an example of his changing Poland when combined with the help of Lech Wałęsa. 

October 19, 2023

The Deep State's Trump-Shaped Keyhole

Things were more boring, pre-Trump, for sure. Of course that hid a cancer that had grown inside the body politic but ignorance is bliss. It was nice being naive and thinking the Republican Party was a force for good. The temptation is to think that we could’ve limped along with Hillary or a Romney for awhile, but the other side of the coin is we had a cancer that would only grow bigger if left untreated. Trump is the chemotherapy and it’s a bitch in the short-term. It could kill the patient, or it might heal it, but either way there’s no going back at this point. 

Trump has such a unique collection of skills, and is so different, that one can’t help but feel he was sent by God to this nation at just such a time.  I remember asking in 2015 how it could be that Trump and Hillary were the two best choices we had. But Trump, amazingly, was the best choice only because of his flaws. Only he could act so blasé and immune to the danger that he faced from enemies within. Only he, with his long history of having been litigated against, could think that being prosecuted by some of the highest courts in the land was only “business as usual”.  Only he, who paid to have a porn star go away, could be “un-blackmailable” by the bureaucracy. It’s like he used the greatest power arrayed against him and turned it around as a weapon on his attacker. He almost turned J6 into a positive. 

In short, Trump has a political courage born of his narcissism that was the perfectly shaped key that unlocked the secrets of the state.

Trump’s rise reminds us that God still writes with history, and through flawed vessels.

October 03, 2023

The Demise of McCarthy

So the high political drama today was Kevin McCarthy losing his speakership; subsequently they decided to simply cancel Congress all week and into next week.

I’m worried about a potential delay in Ukraine funding. I think we should lock them all in a room like a papal conclave until blue and yellow smoke appears.


The wonder of it is that Gaetz telegraphed this six ways from Sunday starting back in January when they had the huge speaker fight. And yet there wasn't a sense of urgency on McCarthy’s part. They didn’t open congress on Monday until 6:30pm and renamed a couple post offices before concluding business. Similarly they took a six week summer break even knowing this September bill was coming due. 

To what can I attribute it to? I recall Bill O’Reilly saying the “swells” like George W Bush couldn’t imagine reversals since they’ve had so few. Seems like McCarthy’s failure to take Gaetz seriously might be along those lines?  Just figuring everything will work out even though you don’t have a plan. Or you’re betting the other guy will fold, and on the merits that usually works. Congress is pretty incompatible with a man of principle. 

I tend to agree with journalist Julie Kelly: “Just my opinion, but my sense is if McCarthy had not embraced Ukraine funding all year; formed a separate J6 committee or at least a highly functioning weaponization committee; and immediately moved to impeach Garland, or Wray, none of this happens.”

It’s sort of the toothless Republican brand that McCarthy has embodied well enough. Don’t rile up the Democrats, lose gracefully, and collect your insider trading profits. 

Ultimately Gaetz has a quintessential American aura about him of being either a great hero or a great villain. He's anything but mediocre. 

October 01, 2023

Speculation on Trans

One of the great mysteries of life is how the trans cult ignited and took off.  If we trace it back to “patient zero” we would go to Bruce Jenner. Did someone get to him and pay him off or did he come up with it on his own? 

Retracing his life we see him in quite a bit of trouble just before the big announcement in April of ’15 that he was “transitioning”. 

In December of ’14 he divorced Kim Kardashian. The gravy train seemed to be slowing.  Even more impactful was the February 2015 fatal multiple-vehicle collision in Malibu. Actress Kim Howe was killed when his SUV ran into Howe's car. Accounts of the sequence of collisions have varied, as have even the number of people injured.  Prosecutors declined to file criminal charges, but three civil lawsuits were filed against Jenner and later settled, with financial details not disclosed. 

So just two months after this horrific accident with the specter of a huge financial need coming, he goes on Barbara Walters.  Coincidence? I don’t doubt he already was into cross-dressing but did the deep state say to him, “we can make your financial and legal problems go away if you come out as a woman”?  It’s a stretch surely but it’s even harder to believe the trans cult happened organically.

September 21, 2023

How I Learned to Be A Crank and Love It

So, yes, I’m officially a crank and I relish it. It’s pretty freeing (if perhaps dangerous spiritually). It’s nice not to care what decent people think. For the first time in my life I don’t feel that Democrats have the “high moral ground” on issues like the poor or the border or “the little man”. I no longer feel Republicans need to speak their truth softly or modestly. Nope, it’s all war, spiritually and politically. 

I feel sorry for the financial person from Fidelity today. Of course she was dying to get me to talk to a financial “expert”, even after I told her we already have a financial advisor.  So here was my spiel in response (wasting her time alas, poor soul):

"That’s actually a very interesting topic. Do we really have experts any more? If you look at every institution, whether political or medical or financial, it seems like there’s this void of authority and credibility. I’m sure your team at Fidelity are great, but even the Federal Reserve doesn’t really know what’s going on so how can Fidelity?  When I grew up Alan Greenspan was like a god, the best central banker of all time, but now he’s been much discredited after bubbles he created resulted in the 2008 financial crisis which we’re still feeling the effects of.... "

She said she understood what I was saying but that her team knows sooo much, much more than she does, and they are really high quality individuals...and she left her email information. 

**

So the gift of another hot “summer” day. Reading is the magic, especially good reading. Augustine is amazed at himself and wonders why people travel to seas and mountains and pass over themselves. Chestertonian.

Few excel more than I do at doing nothing. Chesterton claimed the same, but wrote some crazy 5 million words during his lifetime so I think he’s fibbing. Fortunately for him there was no Twitter, or TV, or 24-7 news sources. 

Tammy Wynette had trouble writing songs in the happy stretches of life and I get that. Nothing produces words more than unhappiness, if only to vent. When my dog Max was driving me crazy, he inspired me to write about him. Now, not so much. Stories demand conflict, and without conflict there is no story. Which is why I wrote mostly about politics now, alas.

I’ve also written trip logs when inspired by beauty or adventure or inconveniences, but I don’t travel like I used to.  I like to write about nature occasionally but there’s no market for nature writing.

Passion and writing are intimately linked. But good writing, and useful writing, requires an audience and a passion that is meaningful.  The only subject where those meet might be spiritual writing since people are religious animals whether they realize it or not. 

One has to consume a lot of experiences of God’s love to write spiritually, I think, and I surely spend too much time reading politics which is, in some ways, anti-spiritual writing. It locks you on worldly things and, worse, it generally displays humanity at its worse (see George Soros).

**

One of the questions of our time is: “How does God win this seemingly losing and lopsided battle with humanity?”

A Bible commentary has this to say: 
“The essence of the mystery lies in the fact that our limited minds cannot fully understand how the inevitability of the success of God’s plan fits in with human freedom. Human freedom must play its part “because the beverage of man’s salvation certainly contains the power to benefit all, but if one does not drink it, one is not healed”. Nor is it possible for us to understand the mystery of how God can allow some people to be rejected despite his desire that all should be saved.

The coincidence in God of infinite justice and infinite mercy is another unfathomable mystery. All that we really need to remember is that God always offers man the opportunity to change and repent. The Church invites us, therefore, not to close our heart to God’s invitations: “O that today you would hearken to his voice! Harden not your hearts”... In Romans 9, Paul defends God’s freedom to be patient and merciful toward sinners, not his freedom to punish sinners."
**

A rather poetic offering from St Augustine in his most famous book, ending with how only the human can see the invisible (it’s our super power): 
And what is this? I asked the earth, and it answered me, “I am not he.” And all that was upon it answered me the same way. I asked the sea and the depths, and all creeping living things, and they answered, “We are not your God. Seek above us.” I asked the stirring air, and all of it, with all its inhabitants, answered, “the philosopher Anaximenes was deceived. l am not God." So I turned to the heavens, sun, moon, and stars, and they too responded, "Nor are we the God whom you seek." And I replied to all the things that encompass the door of my flesh, "You have told me that you are not God. Tell me something about him." And they cried out with a loud voice: "He made us." I questioned them, thinking about them, and their splendor gave the answer.

And I turned to myself and asked, "Who are you?" I answered, "A man." And behold, within me there was present to me my soul and my body, one internal and the other outside. By which of these should I seek my God? I had sought him in the body from earth to heaven, as far as I could send messengers, the very light of my eyes. But it is better to seek by the inner means, for it was like a presiding judge before the bodily messengers that reported to it the answers received from heaven, earth, and all therein, all who said, "We are not God, but he made us." 

Is not this bodily splendor apparent to all who have intact senses? Why, then, does it not say the same thing to all? Animals, both small and great, see it but cannot ask it this, for they have no reasoning set over their senses to judge the reports that they bring forth.

But men can ask it, so that the invisible things of God are clearly seen, being understood through the things that have been made (see Romans 1:20). However, when men love them, they become subject to them, and subjects cannot judge. And creatures only speak this answer to those who can judge. 

Texas AG Ken Paxton on Why Georgia Went Blue & Texas Stayed Red

Starting around minute thirty, Texas AG Ken Paxton explains how the Texas House has prevented election fraud from being prosecuted and how close Texas was to being stolen like Georgia has been since '20. 

Riveting interview and Paxton rightly says that the number one issue is voter integrity and whether future elections will be allowed to be stolen. 

September 19, 2023

The Unrestricted Warfare of the Left

Interesting to see how prescient a book published in China in 1999 was, written by two senior colonels in the Chinese military. It described how the plan going forward was “unrestricted warfare” not confined to the battlefield.

I couldn’t help but think of parallels in our own country that’s reflected in how warfare between conservatives and liberals has reached into every area that can be engaged, from corporations, to “lawfare”, to media suppression and censorship. We’re seeing unrestricted warfare here by the Left. 

Published prior to the bombing of China's embassy in Belgrade, “the book has drawn the attention for its advocacy of a multitude of means, both military and particularly non-military, to strike at the United States during times of conflict: Hacking into websites, targeting financial institutions, terrorism, using the media, and conducting urban warfare are among the methods proposed....The author Qiao was quoted as stating that ‘the first rule of unrestricted warfare is that there are no rules, with nothing forbidden....The United States breaks [UN rules] and makes new ones when these rules don't suit [its purposes], but it has to observe its own rules or the whole world will not trust it.’” 

An excerpt: 

“This is warfare in the age of globalization. Although the boundaries between soldiers and non-soldiers have now been broken down, and the chasm between warfare and non-warfare nearly filled up, globalization has made all the tough problems interconnected and interlocking, and we must find a key for that. The key should be able to open all the locks, if these locks are on the front door of war. And this key must be suited to all the levels and dimensions, from war policy, strategy, and operational techniques to tactics; and it must also fit the hands of individuals, from politicians and generals to the common soldiers. We can think of no other more appropriate key than "unrestricted warfare."

September 16, 2023

On the Wealthy Giving Up on the Wall Street Journal

Interesting commentary from Cornell's Dave Collum: 

“They say that in order to propel yourself politically, you have to succumb to the blackmail bait first. You get corrupted first and then you acquire power.  Which is why I think it’s possible that the pedophile ring has geopolitical implications - if you record someone having sex with a minor you own them forever. By the way, they say the same about Hollywood. You’re not going to get good parts until you subject yourself to the kind of control where they can say, ‘now we own you’.” 

Seems plausible since it’s obvious studios and corporations want to control their talent, which is why Fox News initial interview with Glenn Beck was so threatening. He was getting a job with the network and they were already playing hardball. 

Perhaps an analogy for government is that it’s a rock sitting on the ground. As long as you just see the rock, you think everything’s as it should. But if you turn it over you see all these worms and scorpions and rank decay. 

I always thought Mike Pence was generally upright but now wonder about his role in January 6th riots. His story has changed and he was caught in a direct lies refuted by his aides and others. And it’s not the sort of lie where you simply don’t recall correctly, nor has it been that long ago. It’s also telling that he’s the only Trump aide who is not being prosecuted by the Justice Dep’t.  I suppose if you say what they want you to say you’ll be safe. 

Ultimately the main surprising thing about Trump for me is how thin the gruel is that they got him on. Usually with that laser-like focus on him for eight years you’d think they’d come up with better, especially given how loose Trump is on just about everything (starting with his taxes). 

As it’s often been said, you can indict a ham sandwich but some ham sandwiches are more hammy than others. It’s said the average citizen commits multiple felonies a day so how much more a president living with a lot more rules?  “We live in a society that has criminalized more things than we know or understand... Harvard University professor Harvey Silverglate estimates that the average American citizen commits three felonies per day.” 

So the wonder is that Trump was so docile that they could only get him on: 

a) Russia hoax

b) Ukrainian phone call (which turned out, in retrospect, to be perfectly reasonable given Biden’s corruption) 

c) His call to Georgia asking to try to find 11k fraudulent votes (reasonable request)

d) his role in January 6th where he said that people should march to the capitol & peacefully protest (lol)

e) that he didn’t surrender federal documents when facing a subpoena.   

Only the last one seems to be a crime and even that one is simply a product of the deep state raiding his home (probably illegal).  Hillary famously did the same thing when she destroyed her emails in response to a a subpoena.

So we face the fascinating struggle of '24 in which we have one candidate with a better presidential record and is persecuted by the government versus a rotten, corrupt candidate.  And it could be oh-so-close!! Why?Because of the fantastic array of sources that the irresistible deep state force possesses, starting with the media. 

A third of the country has been lobomotized by mainstream media, another third knows what’s going on but don’t want to say anything because it’s “against their team” (Dems or Washington General Republicans), and a third who gets it (MAGA). (Kudos, btw, to socialist Doug Lain who in Compact Magazine admitted that the Left should be deeply skeptical of the '20 election results, adding "We should take in the fact that the Democrats are attempting to imprison their main opponent.”

Even the rich don't take the Wall Street Journal very seriously anymore. From an interview with capital manager Eric Weinstein: 

"Most of [the super rich and well-connected] have given up on the retail notion of reality. If you have a worldview that allows you to listen to NPR, read the Wall Street Journal, The NY Times...whatever that point of view is, most of the very powerful rich people I know have checked out at a level that is astounding. They don’t believe that they can afford to depend on normal institutions."

August 30, 2023

The '60s Started in 1951?

I’m always fascinated by the “beginnings of our discontent”, i.e. when the ‘60s really started.  I would say the pivotal years were 1948-1954 as reflected in our art, music, film and liturgy (the canaries in the coal mine)...


The categories of when things changed: 

1. Religion (1947) This is hard to pinpoint, but changing the liturgy is, at base, an expression of dissatisfaction and it started by Pope Pius in ’47, increased in ’55, and the mass was made nearly unrecognizable by ’68. So the roots of the ‘60s discontent started in 1947 in the Church. A Mass that was stable and almost changeless for 400 years suddenly needed a lot of work and tinkering apparently. On birth control the Church started backing down in ’55 with acceptance of the rhythm method. 

2. Art (1948) In the late ‘40s we started getting ugly, nonsensical art. “Abstract expressionism” became popular. Another sign of unrest, dissatisfaction, and societal disease. 

3. Books. (1951 decline started with instant success of angsty “Catcher in the Rye”)

4. Music  (1952-53...some music critics say the last time the best music was also the most popular music came during the Big Band era of the ‘30s and ‘40s... which ended with rock and roll about 1952-ish.)

5. Movies (beginning in 1955 expressions of angst and dissatisfaction became big hits) 

6. Politics (1960? JFK appealed to an public more interested in youth/appearance than substance)

7. Family (1964) Divorces, the ultimate expression of discontent, seemed to take off about then. 

8. Television (1968); a lagging indicator. 

So really the cultural fire of the ‘60s were lit by the long fuse of the ‘50s.  I guess similarly the ‘80s return to conservatism were fueled by the long fuse of pent-up dissatisfaction that began in 1968 with the “silent majority” that elected Nixon. From ’68 to ’80 there was the fuse and then Reagan burst on the scene. 

One could say that a return to normalcy and conservatism will take 12 years based on those numbers. The pent-up dissatisfaction showed up in 2016 with the election of Trump (similar to Nixon’s ’68 win for the silent majority) but then Nixon was unsuccessful and we had Jimmy Carter. It took a dozen years to get real change. Similarly twelve years from 2016 would mean we have an opportunity for a new era around 2028 if that pattern holds. Nixon wasn’t able to get anything half-way conservative done in his years because it was too soon; similarly there was nothing Trump could do in his first term, having been handcuffed by the deep state and his own deep state appointments. 

The interesting thing is whether the elites will even allow a reformer to take office ever again. They have more tools for control than in, say, 1980. They own big business in a way they never did before, they have a very compliant press, they are better able to censor speech they don’t like and they can also inflict their will via the justice system.  Lawyers are more powerful than during the ‘70s, to the point they are able to “lawfare” people who even question election results. Almost all of Trump’s lawyers have been arrested. 

On paper, the Democrats have a series of incredible advantages in just about every way possible except for Divine approval. From legal strength, to fundraising, to having a more unified party (Republicans have split between MAGA and establishment), they hold all the cards except for the thin reed of the Supreme Court. Seventy-five percent of lawyers are registered Democrat and they are a major financial pillar within Democrat fundraising. 

“In this world you will have trouble, but worry not, for I have overcome the world.” --gospel of John

August 29, 2023

The Decline and Fall of Borders

If there’s a “theory of everything”, the cause of our dysfunction, it could be that nowadays we abhor borders of any kind.  Most obviously the border between us and Mexico. But also the border between man and woman (trans cult). There’s the border between orthodoxy and heresy, with many bishops even within the church advocating for relaxation between the border of sexuality in marriage versus gay sex. There’s the loss of border between politics and business, and between politics and our justice system. There’s the loss of border between what’s considered crime and not crime: cities often look the other way during BLM riots and have effectively decriminalized shoplifting and drug use by never arresting or prosecuting. The border between Catholicism and Protestantism is often attempted to be breached by liberalizing elements within the Catholic Church, hence the churches nowadays that look like warehouse and childish stained glass windows representing nothing. We don’t like the border between hard doctrine, like the presence of Jesus in the Eucharist, softening the edges until there are no more edges. We don’t like borders in trade so we trade with China and wake up to find they make all our pharmaceuticals. We don’t like borders between people, borders that can be defended in the event of violence by self-defense using a gun, so the Left wants to inflict gun control on us. We abhor the borders of staying within a financial budget, and the government spends far more than it takes in with no notice of the nation’s balance sheet. 

A case where a border is ferociously defended is the border of the womb. No one is safe from abortion if they’re on the wrong side of that border wall. 

August 12, 2023

The DNC Civil War

Interesting commentary and speculation from Tom Luongo on the internal Democrat civil war:

This morning we learned Gavin Newsom was funneling money to Chinese biolabs with Joe Biden’s approval. This is clearly open civil war within the DNC.

There’s been a split in the DNC since they brought Obama in to be the "great black hope of globalism" and they forced Hillary to sideline herself in the primaries back in 2008. Hillary sidelined herself to be Obama’s Secretary of State because Davos (the Euro-based, Soros-ish, communistic elites) had already chosen him to be president because McCain had already been chosen to run against him and McCain was never going to win.

So Clinton drops out early and they tell her “after two terms of Obama it’ll be your turn”. And then Trump won, which is why she’s so bitter, but it also set up this weird process where Obama was president but not head of DNC. Clinton was, and she controlled all the money, the DNC was in debt to her, etc... That was the deal in 2008, Clinton stays in control of DNC while Obama becomes president. That division has been simmering for 15 years now. And every time you see Hillary come out of the woodwork, you see her attacking the Obama wing of the DNC.

She still wants to be president, to be back in the club. She’s a neocon, not a European-style neoliberal. Neocons and neoliberals basically want the same thing but from different directions. Neocons believe in going out and grabbing collateral through war; they care about war first and territorial control far more than the financial, redistribution stuff.

Neoliberals on the other hand, with roots to old Europe, still believe in a colonial-style, mercantilist system to enslave commodity producers. Neoliberals are far more communist in their ideology than neoconservatives and have a chip on their shoulder as a lot of them have direct times to Ukraine. The Clintons, by comparison, are just Arkansas grifters who made good. Obama v Clinton is old European Davos versus Victoria Nuland types.  The dividing line is Israel, and what Israel wants vis-a-vis Iran. The Iran nuclear deal was Obama’s thing, it was Europe’s thing, whereas the neocons in the US were hopping mad about this because they let Iran off the mat. Democrats have been fighting about this since 2014, and on how to destroy Russia.

The knives are out for Biden on both sides, both parties within the DNC want him out. The question is how to deal with the succession? So the things you seeing hitting the media at this time, the stories and headlines, are the evidence of move/countermove chess game. It’s clear that one side wants to replace Biden with Newsom but they have to sideline Harris and I’m not sure she wants to be replaced. No one likes her but who cares? No one liked Joe Biden and he wound up president. Biden was forced to step aside to allow Hillary to take job in ’16, and now they want the same thing to happen this time with Harris stepping aside to allow Newsom to run but I don’t know that Harris has that in her. The headlines coming out now about Newsom funding biolabs in China suggest somebody is getting in on this thing - could it be Kamala? It might be.

The Clinton side want to control the White House. Biden was the perfect go-between - a neocon all of his life, dirty as all get out in Ukraine, and Obama’s boy. So the perfect vessel for everybody to get what they want. The idea was, “we’re going to restore power after four years of Trump.”

But all Kamala has to do is refuse to resign, and if Kamala’s daughter suddenly takes an internship overseas then Harris is definitely not stepping aside, so that’s something to watch for.

August 11, 2023

Most Disappointing (And Pleasant Surprises) Among Leaders Over Past Decade

Pondered my “most disappointing individuals” list over the past decade (and most positively surprising list). The criteria has to start with my familiarity with them and my sense of their moral character. Thus Anthony Fauci is out since I knew nothing about him prior to the pandemic. 

George W. Bush is sort of the pinnacle of disappointing leaders. 

I would say two that are very high on the list would be Francis Collins, a Christian believer (and liar) at the head of the National Health Institute. He resigned in disgrace not long ago. 

Another would be Bill Barr, who had given a speech at Notre Dame on religious and moral character but who has audaciously lied and covered up over the past few years. Few people are as powerful and as disappointing in combination. 

Some would say Mike Pence, and he certainly would qualify if I thought he was smart enough to be wicked. I think he comes by his being used by the deep state “honestly”, meaning dumbly. But I could be wrong given his naked ambition in wanting to be VP and now running for potus. 

Some would say Mitch McConnell and Mitt Romney.  Romney, yes, I suppose although I never trusted him that much to start with given his powers of changing with with the wind. Mitch is mostly about keeping power, so I’m not disappointed in him either. Turtles gonna turtle. 

If you look at the big corruptions of the last decade: Covid, FBI, and elections, you’d have to add James Comey who supposedly is Catholic. 

Jonah Goldberg (now of the Dispatch but it mostly applies to those at National Review too) is high on the list given his total disinterest in the rule of law with regard to Jan 6rs, social media censorship, Russia hoax, etc... As a group were remarkably comfortable with the Deep State as long as it was targeting Trump which as such show they have few principles. 

Biden certainly qualifies since he was so much worse in terms of character and ideology than I ever suspected but he wouldn’t make the top cut since, after all, he’s a Demoncrat. 

Donald Trump surprised me on the upside, so he’s one of the few who were better than I’d expected post-2015 (he benefitted by starting from a low base with me). Matt Gaetz is shockingly better than I ever thought he’d be; I had inadvertently ceded my opinion of him to the zeitgeist and the deep state. Rand Paul I knew was great already and most of the covid-era heroes were unknown to me beforehand. Darren Beattie and Revolver News came out of nowhere so I couldn't say they surprised me. 

In the end I would go with these as the Most Disappointing:  

1. Francis Collins

2. Jonah Goldberg 

3. Bill Barr

4. James Comey

5. Joe Biden 

And I would go with these as Most Surprising to Upside

1. Matt Gaetz

2. Donald Trump

3. Epoch Times newspaper 

4. Steve Bannon 

I'm surely missing a lot of people on both lists. 

August 10, 2023

Does 2024 Election Matter?

Charles Haywood had an interesting response when asked by an interviewer: “I don’t think it matters who is sitting in that [presidential] chair next year, since our problems are so deep-rooted now. Do you agree?” 

He answered: 

Certainly from that perspective - can the person elected solve our problems? - to ask that question is to answer it and the answer is “no”. A person from the Left can’t solve the problems (though he would perceive the problems differently), both because the problems are extremely difficult if not impossible to solve, as well as the problem of controlling the administrative state. The rightwing person has even an bigger set of problems because the administrative state is set against him and even if he were able to promulgate a vision for fixing the problems not a single thing of those things could be done, even if he were more disciplined than Trump. Even if Trump had the discipline and follow-through it wouldn’t have mattered simply because the administrative state was against him.

That said it does matter in the large scheme of things since the presidency is perceived as the ring of power in the American system. What you see historically is that people will struggle over a symbol of power even if everyone agrees it doesn’t have the power to do what they think, because it matters what the symbol is, and it matters that ultimately that symbol might be transmuted into real power.  So while it doesn’t matter who gets elected next year in the sense of who’s going to implement an agenda, it certainly matters as where we’re heading down certain paths we wouldn’t otherwise  go (this assumes that a Tim Scott or Marco Rubio doesn’t get elected, both of whom aren’t symbols of change and have no symbolic value).

Trump, for all his flaws, has the virtue of clarifying where everybody stands. If Trump were to win the election, which doesn’t seem particularly likely, the Left would be unwilling to accept that defeat even though the defeat would be more symbolic than anything else. Trump would accelerate things, reveal certain things about the political situation that no one else would. He would make a difference in the sense that “things would go differently”, rather than “he could make a difference”.

**

Issue 1 got soundly defeated. 57%-43%. Not surprising given that most people want direct democracy rather than a republican democracy (direct democracy, also known as mob rule, allows minority rights to get squashed, meaning in the future religious liberties could be taken away by a slim majority). 

Leftist groups were super motivated given abortion is their key issue and now in November now all they have to do is get 50.1% of the vote to amend the Constitution and make abortion legal.  I figured the issue would fail but not by that margin. Maybe the Republican hope was that they could fly it under the Dem radar but that’s like trying to get dawn past a rooster. Jacob Dreisen says that the simple thing is that there’s not a united opposition to the Democrats, that there’s essentially no representation for those pushing back against the Regime. It’s just tiny pockets of House members and three or four senators. And Trump of course but he needs Congress to do anything substantive.  

Let’s score modern day politics:

2008: Defeat

2012: Defeat

2016: Victory

2018: Defeat (Senate race)

2020: Defeat

2022: Mixed (JD Vance won; Kari Lake loss was big)

2023: Defeat (Issue 1) 

So a mixed record (assuming it even matters). Looking at Ohio results alone: loss, loss, win, loss, win, tie, loss, so Ohio is 2-4-1 over the past seven meaningful elections. The US as a whole is 1-5-1. 

There are plenty of grounds for pessimism which is the easy and broad course to take, which means we have to try to steer towards the narrow course. The challenge is to be prepared to lose a lot but be cheerful despite it. 

August 08, 2023

August 07, 2023

Paris 1996

One score and seven years ago I spent a few hours in Paris.  Here are some shots of the street scene:








July 29, 2023

Zmirak on Morality of Atomic Weapons

 John Zmirak on the nuclear bombs in WW2:

I wish the discussions of "Oppenheimer" by Catholics focused on the moral question of atomic weapons, as used at Hiroshima. Yes, targeting civilians is appalling. But virtually ALL the wars before the 18th century were fought that way, with "laws of war" allowing for pillage and slaughter of cities successfully besieged--with no such clear condemnations from churchmen as we hear concerning Hiroshima. The 100 Years War, Henry V and all, was mostly Englishmen killing and robbing French peasants, to provoke the French kings into open combat (which they'd usually lose).

Just War theory of distinctions between combatants and civilians was not a myth, but a blurry line given the totalitarian conscription of societies in modern war. 

People vaporized by a nuke are just as dead as those burned alive in their cities during the 30 Years War. The firm distinction between civilians and combatants is a WONDERFUL thing. It's just a recent thing, which Catholic triumphalists throwing stones at the US over Hiroshima shouldn't pretend has been a clear and unambiguous Church teaching for 2000 years.

Furthermore, the distinction isn't that useful. Bombing arms factories for instance. Are those civilians or part of the military?

What about when a foreign government arms the whole population and tells it to fight? That's what Japan did.

The ideal moral solution would have been to signal a mass land invasion, make it clear WHERE it would happen, then nuke the whole Japanese army. Then blockade the islands and starve them into surrender.

Probably more civilians would have died, but it would have colored within the lines, if that's any consolation.

People vaporized by a nuke are just as dead as those burned alive in their cities during the 30 Years War. The firm distinction between civilians and combatants is a WONDERFUL thing. It's just a recent thing, which Catholic triumphalists throwing stones at the US over Hiroshima shouldn't pretend has been a clear and unambiguous Church teaching for 2000 years.

Furthermore, the distinction isn't that useful. Bombing arms factories for instance. Are those civilians or part of the military?

What about when a foreign government arms the whole population and tells it to fight? That's what Japan did.

The ideal moral solution would have been to signal a mass land invasion, make it clear WHERE it would happen, then nuke the whole Japanese army. Then blockade the islands and starve them into surrender.

Probably more civilians would have died, but it would have colored within the lines, if that's any consolation.

July 28, 2023

Is Mercy Harsh?

Pondered a homily heard on Sunday about the Lord not pulling the weeds when evil has planted them. The priest said that that’s a function of God being not just the God of the good, but also the God and creator and lover of those who are evil. God has a responsibility we don’t and he wants them to come to salvation. Unlike the fallen angels, humans can still be rescued as long as they are alive. He said we think of ourselves as waiting on God, but it is God who waits on us - between now and the Judgement - for our response. 

We think of mercy as a good thing and it is but it’s...complicated? The famous book about C.S. Lewis and his short-lived wife was called “A Severe Mercy”. Sounds oxymoronic.  Flannery O’Connor has a line in one of her stories that goes, “even the mercy of the Lord burns.” A commentator said that the “divine is at least as terrifying as the demonic.” 

O’Connor’s biographer followed the roots of her fervent Catholicism and:

“...traces the outlines of a life marked by illness and suffering, but ultimately defined by an irrepressible joy and even hilarity. In her stories, and in her life story, Flannery O’Connor extends a hand in the dark, warning and reassuring us of the terrible speed of mercy....The biography’s title, ‘The Terrible Speed of Mercy’, hints at the connection between O’Connor’s characters’ violent experiences and their readiness to accept God’s grace."

July 27, 2023

Peter, James and John: Three Types?

Interesting to hear that the three apostles so often singled out - Peter, James and John - have three specific characteristics or reasons to be singled out.  Peter was assigned as leader and first pope, John for being the mystic, and James for being the most courageous.  James died very early as a martyr and that combined with his being a “son of thunder” and wanting to call fire down upon unbelievers, he seems to have had more courage than many of the others including most especially Peter (who denied Christ and later after the Resurrection was worried about what Jews thought of him for eating with Gentiles). Perhaps these are the three types of Christian disciples: the “mystic” (i.e. the monk, Mary, etc..), the courageous (John the Baptist, James, the warriors...), and the leaders. 

Three types of people Plato identified: 


“The philosopher Plato suggested a trichotomy of three types of people: gold, silver, and bronze. These were fitted, by merit, for different roles in the republic: rulers or philosopher kings, the military, and the tradesmen, farmers, cobblers, builders, etc. at the bottom. These were in turn ruled by different parts of the body: the head; the heart, the symbol of bravery and not love in those days and the belly, separated from the heart by the waist. The three types were characterized by their different goals, personalities, and values: respectively wisdom and virtue, valor and bravery, and physical pleasure and sensory gratification."

What if instead of the head, heart, and belly the Christian view is head, heart and mind? Thus the head would be fitted as rulers and philosopher (doctrinal) kings (Peter), heart by courage (James), and the mind by John? 

Or, when Jesus said “love the Lord your God with all your heart, with all your soul, and all your mind”, the mind could be Peter (leader, doctrinal king). The heart could be courage (James) and the soul the mystic (John).

July 14, 2023

How and Why Things Go South

I share Amy Welborn's curiosity of how, when, and why things go bad. She's forgotten more history than I know so I hold her opinions in especial esteem. Here's a money quote for ya:  

One of the things I often think about is how do things go bad – especially institutions, and especially religious institutions. 

The fruit of all that thought is, among other points, the conviction that the key to a healthy religious institution is the awareness of just that point – things can go bad. And maybe even inevitably will. That human beings are weak, flawed and sinful and will corrupt what they touch, no matter how noble the initial intentions. This is the history of the world, of the Church, isn’t it?

I continually seek out explanations for the inexplicable but it likely just comes down to wisdom of "things can go bad". Even (especially?) when started with the best of intentions.

One relatively minor example (in the big scheme) is electronic voting machines. It began after the Bush-Gore '00 lawfare and machines were seen as an improvement that would take human intervention (i.e. identifying chads) out of the process. 

But that was a figment of everyone's collective imagination because machines are even more prone to human intervention since they have programmers (who are 100% human, I was one for decades). Even worse, these programs are hidden behind proprietary walls and coding complexity meaning they are essentially unauditable. (Again, I would know.) Worse, they centralize voting so that fraud can happen in, say, thirty states at once instead of at a county or state level. 

The creation of the CIA was in response to need for intelligence after WW2. 

Originally the US Attorney General was to give advice to the President when requested, such as on constitutionality of bills. From that humble beginning it morphed into the giant hydra-headed monster called the DoJ, from which sprang the bitter fruit of the FBI.

**

But the really fascinating period is 1953-1966. Fourteen years. From Bishop Sheen being a surprise TV star to the famous Time cover saying, "Is God Dead?". 

Let's oversimplify and make it three eras of perhaps impactful milestones:

1954-1959. The Seeds?: Obscenity "Howl" by Ginsberg...Movie "Rebel without a Cause"..."Lolita"...First Playboy centerfold... Jung on Time cover...Teilhard de Chardin becomes popular...First Elvis Presley hit..."Peyton Place" bestseller...Pope John XXIII becomes pope...US birth rate begins to fall. 

1960-1963. Bad Fruit: Birth control pill...Berlin Wall....CIA kills JFK...Madalyn O’Hair sues to remove Bibles in school... Ike exposed as having lied... Prayer banned from U.S. public schools...Betty Friedan’s “Feminine Mystique”.

1964-1966. Evil: Hollywood ban on pornography broken... First changes to Mass made...“Valley of Dolls” ...American Atheists founded...Supreme Court allows contraception...First Roman Polanski film “Repulsion”...Time magazine cover story "Is God Dead?”.. The Church of Satan formed in San Francisco.

Starting after that, violent crime in NYC went up 20% annually through '72...states decriminalize abortion in cases of rape, incest...gay movement begins in '69, Manson murders, no-fault divorce in CA. SCOTUS was almost a lagging indicator with the '73 Roe v Wade.

July 11, 2023

The DeSantis Dilemma

The talking point of pro-DeSantis boosters is Trump can’t win the general. They say 2024 is absolutely crucial and so the safe thing is vote for someone other than Trump. I’m thinking that’s an argument to vote *for* Trump ---- if the country is so fragile that it will crash if a Democrat is elected than we surely need a bulldozer (Trump). 

René Girard disciple Luke Burgis recently posted this on Twitter: 

"There's a way of going through life where, for many years, maybe even decades, you can feel as if you're just barely keeping your head above water. Paradoxically, the solution is not to keep struggling but to let yourself drown. The struggle was the wrong one to begin with.”

Not sure I agree, but interesting take.

Maybe our country needs to drown.

**

The thinking of DeSantis backers is that “it’s better for one man to be imprisoned [Trump] than for the nation to perish”. I think DeSantis should burn the boats behind him (ie the establishment) and promise to pardon Trump. 

At any rate, DeSantis has to be a fighter not just on cultural front - which is the responsibility of we the people - and fight the war we are powerless over, namely the justice system and DOJ and FBI.  Consumers can punish Disney or Bud Light, but we can’t punish the FBI. That’s where DeSantis needs to step up. But he can't, because then the establishment would leave him and he'd be a man without a country. 

June 29, 2023

When Did Churches Worship at the Altar of the 501-3c?

One of the more puzzling facets of modern life is how Christian churches washed their hands of politics even though “man is a political animal” as Aristotle taught.  To wash your hands of politics is like washing your hands of part of your humanity -- like washing your hands of religion (for man is also a religious animal who must worship something). 

Of course the simplest reason Christian churches abdicated responsibility is money: churches want to keep that tax deductible status at all costs since it would presumably result in a crash in donations.  So, in a sense, the government at this point "owned" churches. 

But what’s odd is we have a clear and recent example of what happens when the local church doesn’t want to get involved in politics: Nazi Germany.  It seems hard to imagine Hitler would’ve come to power and been so politically successful had the dominant German Lutheran church taken a hard stand. I assume because of our belief in American exceptionalism and the figment of our Constitution, we figured nothing like that could happen here. 

Examining our history it began, as usual, with good intentions: charities had been given tax breaks since the Tariff Act of 1894. Back then, most revenue of the federal government had come from tariffs.

One of the more evil men ever to become US President, Woodrow Wilson, not surprisingly had a hand in directing that organizations “disseminating controversial or partisan propaganda’ were not ‘educational’ for purposes of qualifying for tax-exempt status...As a result, contributions to these organizations were not deductible from the new federal income tax.”

To try to separate humans from politics is trying to separate where God ends and man begins with regard to scriptural inspiration - they are entwined to such a degree that it’s hopeless to try to disentangle.  Legal challenges came and no clear standard emerged from the court decisions so as a charitable organization you had to guess to the degree you were “controversial” or “partisan”. 

Another very evil man who became president was Lyndon Johnson, and he was eager to ban any political activities even to the point of not allowing the endorsement of a candidate by any group or church receiving tax exempt status. And so continued the building of the wall between church and state that was never intended by the founders. 

June 23, 2023

Last 100 years of Spiritual Warfare

I think one of the mistakes I’d made about history was that I’d pictured it more as a logical progression from one thing to another, one technology to another, etc... But it’s more of a spiritual tug-of-war with one side gaining temporary victory. That’s the thing I missed - all victories are temporary and all defeats are temporary. The Church is failing now, just as it was succeeding in the ‘50s. It probably happens like that because when you’re winning the tug-of-war you think it’s easy and let your guard down, even though it’s ever fought at a deep and difficult level.

Looking at the decades of the ‘40s-‘80s and you see a tremendous whipsawing back and forth of good and evil. 

The “god” of this world for at least a century has been science, and so it’s not surprising that it has been used as the premiere Trojan horse for evil.  In the 1920s & ‘30s, eugenics was “science” that deemed Jews worthy of death, Down syndrome  babies unworthy of birth, and blacks inferior to whites. Some of this “science” went so far as to be able to supposedly tell murders by the shape of their head and teeth. 

In 1948 “science” was used to create the conditions for the sexual revolution. Alfred Kinsey’s fraudulent sex report was released that year:

“Kinsey's work and research was manipulated so that its results would be indicative of what he himself believed, without any real and tangible scientific support. According to Paul Robinson, one of Kinsey's biographers, Kinsey's work was designed to ‘undermine the traditional sexual order.’[6] Kinsey had his own amoral agenda and hoped to use his research as the scientific base to ‘change society's traditional moral values.’”

But there was help from the good guys. Thomas Merton published a fabulously successful book about his spiritual journey called “Seven Storey Mountain”.  George Orwell wrote a prescient book warning of government overreach and surveillance called “1984”. In 1948, Billy Graham has his first hugely successful crusade. In that same year, a nun (Mother Theresa) received a vision from God to found an order serving the poor in India. 

 Attack - counterattack. Attack - counterattack. 

In 1952 Norman Vincent Peale writes a surprise best-seller advocating memorization of bible verses to bolster positive thinking. The next year an even bigger surprise came when Bishop Sheen was a television star. 

The momentum was all on the side of “team good”. But, the enemy was awakened and a fierce counterattack began.

In 1954, wary of the sudden popularity (and thus power) of Sheen and Peale, LBJ inserts his amendment into legislation that forbids churches from participating in the political process. This is the first step towards a wall between church and state and a de-Christianized society.

In 1956, Playboy Magazine started and “Lolita” was published. Elvis and his hips came on the scene then too. In 1957, an obscene gay sex book “Howl” by Allen Ginsberg.was published and the beat poet era began. By ’59 Bishop Sheen was off the air and St. Pope Pius XII had died -- the last good pope until John Paul II came along in ’78. 

In 1960 the Christian charismatic movement began, starting with the Anglicans and making it to Catholics by 1968. But the ‘60s were mostly a series of catastrophic losses. School prayer and Bible studies were banned. The birth control pill was invented and quickly the Supreme Court legalized contraception and then abortion. In ’64 the first movie to break Hollywood ban on pornography appeared and by ’72 X-rated movies were common. The gay movement begins in ’69. 

Then more counterattacks from the good guys. The “Jesus revolution” of the hippies occurs in the late ‘60s and early ‘70s and hundreds of thousands are baptized. Jimmy Carter, an unapologetic Christian, is elected president in ’76.  Jerry Falwell’s “Moral Majority” begins in ’79 and helps kick off the Reagan era. John Paul II is elected pope in ’78. The Medjugorje apparitions begin in ’81. It’s a counterattack that eventually fells the Soviet Union and lead to a better U.S. judiciary, one that promised to eventually roll back Roe... 

**

Bill Buckley’s brother Reid was kind of a prophet when he complained in ‘06 about GW Bush not getting his judges and nominees through. In 2016 it was “hold my beer” time given how they destroyed Trump:

“The necessary political concordat of any democracy is .. that its president have the right to their nominees for the cabinet, the bench, and the major bureaus, who are properly rejected only for reasons of incompetence or unethical conduct…and by vote of the full Senate, not a cabal. That this modus operandi has been dissed by the Democratic leadership, establishing an ugly precedent, bodes ill for our republic.”

Buckley went on to say, “Our representatives as a whole, the political establishment, without ideological distinction, though with a few sterling exceptions--are, have become, our republic's assassins.”

He died in 2015 so never got to see how his predictions came true to even a (previously) political establishment lover like me. The failure to accept Trump as duly elected president in '16 broke the legimitacy of our government.