Without a blue dress...
What's fascinating is where to draw that reasonable doubt line. With the Jackson case - after watching more television drivel tonight - I guess I have to agree that it's a close call. But let's look at what is uncontested:
1) boy slept with Jackson in Jackson's bed
2) the fingerprints of both Jackson and the victim are on a homosexual porn magazine in Jackson's bedroom
With number 2, you can no longer assume that Jackson is an ingenue. It shows he's not asexual nor a misunderstood Peter Pan. He has the adult drives. And he has accusers. Is Michael Jackson like Ghandi, who slept with naked women in order to train himself in greater self-control? Now that's doubtful.